I've been a bit of an political economy nerd recently (as exhibited by my IC posts about structural violence and poverty >_>), so with that in mind, are we sure the Disassociated are exclusively criminal underworld stuff?
No, and I have missed something, but I don't think that's been the consensus in this thread.
Like, the Homeless item. How are the homeless/poor in the State organized, and where do they live? I've pictured it as a bit of a have/have-not situation (versus the more subjective and varying definitions of social class in the Fed). Shanty towns? Do the Disassociated only become tied to the criminal underworld because people like the Guristas move in to control these shanty towns?
It's a big cluster. How are they organized and where do they live? There are a million good answers to the question, not just a few, and all of them are valid. You shouldn't look at the "disassociated" as a class or bloc. It is a term to describe individuals and corporations that have fallen from favor/influence. You're a young Caldari (with average evaluations and no family connections) who decides to take a risk and sign on to a new mining firm at age 16, but by the time you turn 20, a few accidents have stalled production, the investors have pulled out, and the stock has tanked.
Your firm's parent mega, let's say... Ishukone, can't justify a buy-out and the company you signed your life to goes bankrupt to be broken up and auctioned off. Even though you're a healthy and level-headed young 20-something, you now have the misfortune of having worked for a failing company. Maybe
you didn't work hard enough? Since your corporation tanked, the management must have been sub-par... and
they hired you. Your shot at advancement isn't looking to good as you try and find another corporation to call home. And if you can't find a place willing to sign you, where's the room and board (and professional development) going to come from?
Your career has stalled and you'll probably end up working below your potential at a no-name subsidiary for a long while yet. Them's the breaks. You could have gone crawling to Mama Mega on your 16th birthday and begged for a life-contract and all the stability that comes from a life of administrative/factory/maintenance/janitorial work, but you wanted to see space first and live more adventurously. It was a risk that might have paid off, but it didn't, and now you're in line with the rest of the disassociated, every one of you with their own story to tell, waiting to see what you can get out of a second-hand life.
This is one simple example, but the point is that you would be wrong to assume "disassociated" means a gaggle of dirty homeless in rags waiting in a queue to be scooped up by the Guristas.
Secondly, how do the Practicals justify their actions to their populace? Pure out propaganda? Same as Fed coating their actions in propaganda.
FTFY. And, yes, of course.
As players we have a LOT of OOC knowledge that might be sheltered from the actual inhabitants of EVE. For example, with the Protein delicacy fiasco, the fact that they were made from biological waste was just not told to the SuVee public, so they could paint the Fed people as being reactionary for no reason.
Keep in mind the general public can see the IGS. If it's been discussed there, they know about it.
To me, I find it confusing how the Caldari are possibly honorable (though it says they are 'more unscrupulous than the Gallente') but have a so-called "unethical" corporation.
Define honor.
Perhaps the honour bit is a player-construct, because of all the Japanese influences? Potentially, the Caldari moral system is radically different from ours as players (for example, not caring about those who are seen as 'weak')
It doesn't have anything to do with not caring for the "weak". It has to do with ostracizing those who are seen as selfish or who aren't doing their part (as much as they are able). See the below?
The notion of individuality, so prized by the Gallente, tended to be viewed by the Caldari as little more than selfish blindness to the grander scheme of things, and was frowned upon by the vast majority of their leaders as well as the industrious masses that made up the civilian populace. After the first Gallente-Caldari war, the Chief Executive Panel – the corporate heads making up the Caldari State’s ruling body – went even further with this ideology, soon enough taking their seat as polar opposites to their hated nemeses. While it may seem tempting to ascribe this to the ideological rubberbanding sometimes experienced by newly independent states, there is a great deal of historical data that suggests that even as far back as the time of the Raata-Oryioni empire thousands of years ago, the people who would later become the Caldari were already highly collectivistic in outlook and action.