Backstage - OOC Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

That Federal member states retain control of their home systems, as seen exercised here?

Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: Loyalist round table  (Read 7453 times)

Shalee Lianne

  • Wetgraver
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 97
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #15 on: 20 Apr 2010, 17:52 »

I like this idea.  We should do it.
Logged

Graelyn

  • Ye Olde One
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1349
  • These things just seem to happen...
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #16 on: 21 Apr 2010, 12:28 »

I would be glad to be involved.
Logged


If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!

Aldrith Shutaq

  • Fleet Captain
  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 600
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #17 on: 21 Apr 2010, 17:12 »

Round tables are very knightly.

Just sayin'.
Logged

orange

  • Dex 1.0
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1930
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #18 on: 21 Apr 2010, 20:20 »

Can we get a thread title name change?  Amarrian Loyalist round table perhaps?

No offense guys, but there are Minmatar, Gallente, and Caldari loyalist too.
Logged

Merdaneth

  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 557
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #19 on: 22 Apr 2010, 02:24 »

What is the definition of loyalist really?

Would Blood Raider adherents be invited, EoM, people critical of Jamyl etc?
Logged

Ashar Kor-Azor

  • Banned
  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 656
  • Banned
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #20 on: 22 Apr 2010, 03:45 »

Frankly, we shouldn't even keep the thread. Should be Amarr & Subfaction OOC Round Table.

There's not a lot to talk about when you call it a loyalist roundtable and invite interesting but borderline corporations, and anything the core loyalist corps talk about there, they could just as easily talk about elsewhere.

scagga

  • Everything for Vaari
  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 570
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #21 on: 22 Apr 2010, 07:06 »

Sounds interesting, I'd be happy to participate.
Logged

lallara zhuul

  • Now with rainbows and butterflies.
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1123
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #22 on: 22 Apr 2010, 10:48 »

Lall is Loyal, to God, and her notion of the Empire.

Does that count?
Logged

Be the Ultimate Ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today!

Laerise [PIE]

  • Definetly not a Khanid !
  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 534
  • TANKRED ENDURES
    • PIE Forums
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #23 on: 22 Apr 2010, 11:03 »

Lall is Loyal, to God, and her notion of the Empire.

Does that count?

Uh, if you ask me, yes I guess.. as long as you're not a cuddle-me-liberal I don't see any reason to keep you out - and if only to have an ic shouting match  :|

Just before people start getting offended: if I host this I'm very happy to welcome everyone who is involved with amarr RP on the amarrian side of things to an OOC round table.
Logged

Graelyn

  • Ye Olde One
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1349
  • These things just seem to happen...
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #24 on: 28 Apr 2010, 14:01 »

Soooo, when is this going down?
Logged


If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!

Esna Pitoojee

  • Keeper of the Harem
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2095
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #25 on: 02 May 2010, 00:12 »

Thread seems to have stalled a bit, so I'll restart it with a first question.

Sarum's political agenda has swing mostly to the more liberal side. While she has made some aggresive moves, the vast majority of her actions (release of ninth generation slaves, reuniting with the Khanid Kingdom rather than just screaming "HERETICSSSS!" at them, and even the management of the Ammatar Mandate, which although officially run by Ardishapur is surely recieving significant royal scrutiny). This has more potential to create a rift between the hard-line conservative and more adaptable liberal Amarrian loyalists than anything since... well, actually the Sarumite-vs-rest-of-Empire conflict.

So, could an Amarrian civil war between hardliners and liberals be possible? Who would your character side with? Why?
Logged
I like the implications of Gallentians being punched in the face by walking up to a Minmatar as they so freely use another person's culture as a fad.

Mizhara

  • Prophet of New Eden
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2545
  • The Truth will make ye Fret.
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #26 on: 02 May 2010, 02:45 »

I can't answer your question, Esna, but a public round-table for loyalist players would be immensely interesting, to be honest. I don't have any Amarr characters, or loyalist characters, but this strikes me as one hell of a learning opportunity. The greatest problem I've had when playing Mizhara (Anti-Amarrian more than Pro-Matari) is that the opponents seem to be... hiding. Not in space. For the most part, brave people and good pilots, but there's no real interaction besides pew-pew.

Hard to get to know 'the other side'. I approve very much of a round-table idea like this, both for the reasons mentioned further up (wiping out some of the tensions and hostilities within the same faction, OoC and so on) and for my own little selfish reasons.

Get this thing going guys. I'll be here.
Logged


lallara zhuul

  • Now with rainbows and butterflies.
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1123
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #27 on: 02 May 2010, 03:41 »

Jamyl is an abomination unto God.
She is a coward that has brought shame to her House.
She is an agent of the Deceiver that is leading the Empire to its destruction.
She has lead the Faithful of Amarr into a futile war in the service of the Deceiver, therefore instead of martyring the Faithful they are being condemned to go to Hell because they have turned away from God.

Just my view on the situation :D
Logged

Be the Ultimate Ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today!

Esna Pitoojee

  • Keeper of the Harem
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2095
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #28 on: 02 May 2010, 11:38 »

Jamyl is an abomination unto God.
She is a coward that has brought shame to her House.
She is an agent of the Deceiver that is leading the Empire to its destruction.
She has lead the Faithful of Amarr into a futile war in the service of the Deceiver, therefore instead of martyring the Faithful they are being condemned to go to Hell because they have turned away from God.

Just my view on the situation :D

So I take it then if a civil war did occur, you'd side with the hardliners fighting against Jamyl, but more beause you believe her to be an abomination unto God than because you have specific issues with her policies?
Logged
I like the implications of Gallentians being punched in the face by walking up to a Minmatar as they so freely use another person's culture as a fad.

Graelyn

  • Ye Olde One
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1349
  • These things just seem to happen...
Re: Loyalist round table
« Reply #29 on: 07 May 2010, 14:32 »

I think the hard-liners exist, but are few in number. It can be hard to back someone as a living miracle sent from God, and the launcher of the glorious reclaiming at last, and then to plot against her soon after.
Besides, Jamyl is a strong monarch. I get the feeling that if she does have powerful enemies, they had best not let it be known.
Logged


If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!
Pages: 1 [2] 3