Interesting theory, and I actually had looked at those connections before. Then again, I absorbed everything I could regarding Enheduana, Inanna, Gilgamesh, the whole flood myth etc. when I was in high school. That's why when I first saw EVE, and the Amarr, I fell in love with the setting. It was a kind of odd anachronistic mix of modern social commentary and ancient myth on some weird psychedelic Sci-Fi acid trip that just blew my mind.
Now, I doubt the guys who originally came up with the EVE backstory had much in the way of formal literary training of any kind. As I told a friend a few years ago, it's like a computer programmer who played a bit of DnD, a couple elective mythology classes and some political science on the way to realizing his true calling decided to make a new and improved version of Battletech. Not a bad thing, but if you stick to that formula someone's going to connect the dots. Not to mention the fact that much of EVE seems to have been written with a copy of Orson Scott Card's "Guide to Writing Science Fiction and Fantasy" at their computer (and misinterpreted some of the examples as "This is how you do it" instead of "This is how
not to do it", but I digress).
So, what does this have to do with the Sleeper mystery?
Simple; forget the names. Forget the symbols. Forget the similarities and correlations. They're honestly meaningless in the end, because they don't answer any of the questions. What does the evidence say?
For me, the story is simple, at least in relation to the Sleepers. The Sleepers were smart. Very smart. If they were indeed a download society, then they would be
very smart. They would want to preserve themselves, their society, their way of life. But as a download society, how do they do that? Regardless of whether or not they were a download society, the next point is unchanged; they had the means, motive, and opportunity to set up the following:
A database, with multiple redundancies. A mirror. Not just one mirror, but a network of mirrors. Designed to slowly dismantle their outlying infrastructure, and transfer it deeper and deeper towards the mirrors. They are going to conserve energy. They are, above all, going to want to keep what systems they can activated, with one purpose; continuing to solve whatever problem forced them into their current state, and to defend their legacy.
Now, the funny thing? The Rogue Drones; they operate on similar (though admittedly only at face value) concepts. Is this coincidence, a convergence in the evolutionary process they are following, or is it that they are based on similar technological principles?
That's the story of the Sleepers. Everything else should be noted;
everything. The similarities, the crazy theories,
absolutely everything.
Why?
Because, silly, this is a
journey. Go into sleeper space, walk the path, and find out an old mystery. Find new ones. Explore and evolve.
Now, what I really want to know is this; did they save their "best and brightest"? Is there a user's manual? Are the Jove really connected, or are they as clueless as everyone else?
For that matter, what happened to the "Ten Year Plan" that the Devs touted so long ago, and how much more time do they have in that plan?
Going back to Orson Scott Card, he also says something in the above mentioned book: some writers wrongly believe that withholding information is the best way to build up tension (tension being the thing you can't get have enough of in a story), but that the key is to only keep one piece of information back: what is going to happen next. Everything else, and I mean
everything put out there, must be relevant to the plot or affect the story in some meaningful way. This is why some of the recent "revelations" of the behind-the-scenes happenings in the storyline department at CCP worry me, but at the same time it gives me hope that things are going to progress in a more fluid and dynamic way in the future (though I won't be around to reap the benefits of this as an EVE player).
So, you tell me; in regards to the Sleepers is there too much innuendo and too little information? Is too much being held back of the story? Or is just enough being withheld to keep everyone from guessing the next beat?
Oh, and one more note:
Nietzsche and Kierkegaard: mentioned by Dropbear. Kierkegaard had some interesting ideas on truth, and faith. How does this compare and contrast with Nietzsche and Descartes? What are the implications of these insights on the writings of Ior Labron?
There will (not) be a quiz later.
Also, to CCP Dropbear: if you're reading this...
Hahaha, I get the joke now! Intentional or not, quite hilarious.