FWIW the same applies to your interpretation of RK's approach to combat in general and this conflict more specifically. Particularly this bit:
In actuality Rote functions just like any other 0.0 power really, powerful in a group certainly, but difficult to motivate for individual acts of creativity and genius most especially in relation to principled ideological warfare.
For starters Rote doesn't operate with any sort of ideological goals or campaign targets; this goes doubly so with high-sec wars, especially since the SF wardec was largely for crim flagging convenience on a tower not hunting targets (thanks CCP for that UI patch
). It seems to me like you are trying to apply the SF approach to war and combat to an entity which doesn't operate at all like SF does, which naturally leads to a misunderstanding of our actions. In that vein I would say you are completely wrong about RK pilots and individual motivation. We have quite a few very skilled solo (and very small gang) pilots who do some rather impressive stuff. Just a quick look over
Proxay's Tengu slaughtering spree to see some of the more recent stuff. I think I can safely say that the majority of RK's pilots (aside from FOVRA) much prefer to operate in null-sec and don't particularly care much for low-sec or high-sec wardec fighting. It usually takes a missioning carrier to spark an interest in roaming into Placid low-sec on most nights.
tl;dr version:
Veto has ideology?
F1, F2, F-- :groupall: F1...
Total mystery why we get along so well with Veto.