People tend to think 'Liberal' means the same treehugging baby kissing thing as it means in reality or in the Federation. It's a common thought pattern that because we're Liberals, we're easy targets or weaker than the rest of the State. While it's true that Ishukone is financially destitute (1), mostly thanks to TonyG... we're not weak willed spineless coward white-knights.
White-Knight (2). That's probably the best descriptor of what TonyG did to us. He turned us into people who would rather give away Insorum than sell it. While I'm playing along with that line, because it is technically PF... I think it's a ridiculous concept that completely craps all over who Otro Gariushi was in the original chrons (3).
True. And if I may add numbers to your argument and start with the easist one: 3.
(3) As you rightful mention, his picture doesnt fit with the PF which was in place before TO and TEA. But thats him, as for me he never told a story of EVE, just his story of EVE. Maybe one day I make a long boring 30 page essay, about TonyG PF errors; and uploaded it as pdf. So that I always can link stuff, and I havent to repeat myself again and again, etc....
(2) I think White-Knight is a nice term, and is less provocative as I had in mind. I think, the problem is, that
first he has brought a lot of his own world view to this book (which isnt, that bad. Thanks to TonyG positive association with that term "liberal" you get the KNIGHT part. I dont know him, but if I see this book as his statement I would guess does he isnt anti-Liberal/
Democrat). Secondly, that he trys to get this formula "Caldari Liberals"="North American understanding of Liberalism". Which as you rightfully mention isnt true. Caldari Liberals are far from being "modern Social Democrates"/"Tony Blair style Labour Party". As for me they where just the most economic liberals in the Caldari bloc. Which has bring them close the NeoLiberal ideals. By the way: NeoLiberalism isnt a economics term, it comes form political science, to be precisely from the international relations. It is more the understanding, that economical freedom, market participation and interdependenz would lead to a interconnections between the players/nations in the international relations; which then would lead to less conflicts between them (as it takes "anarchy elements" form them; and brings them under the realm of the invisible hand....etc). This interconnectioness is another tool, next to the selfhelp system, which secures
survival, security and PEACE. But, I have gone now off topic again
. As for me the Caldari Liberals were never Democrats POINT.
(1) I dont understand it either. You can also add to the TCMCs, this
news. I understand, that a company which deals with capital intensive goods, superior goods + a capital intensive production has the need for cash; but it doesnt mean it is broke. Thats is a point which I have try to show indirectly on my old CAESA page (see
here. before I have deleted all my stuff as protest of the Khanid Kingdom lore changes.).
"Today for many historians is this step of the Empire not so surprising, than since the beginning of the war in the year YC 110 the Caldari State and his major corporations were underfunded and thirsted for capital;" Is a line which I have added. So I get they need capital, as I mention before for their business, you can also add here for their fleet. As the Caldari navy and the corporate fleets are more up to date as others, which means that they are more capital intensive and bound more capital.
BUT ALL THIS POINTS DONT MEAN THAT THEY ARE BROKE. So, I get your point and agree you are right. Needing liquid cash (which they got thru CAESA and the market most likely) and being broke are two different things. I try not to make a 60 page essay about false statements of TonyG. Kat, Just go out and say: Needing liquid capital ≠ financially destitute. It is just one of his false equations. I try not do a 90 page rant-essay about his others f*** ups, and his macro-macro "analysis".