I really like the direction they take for this global ship revamp. It makes more sense and also looks a lot cleaner and proper.
Besides ASB modules that I still do not like at all in their design, I am a bit meh about their announced changes on cruisers.
- Making logistic T1 cruisers proper logistic ships is good.
- Making sure that EW T1 cruisers are doing their job better is good.
- Making sure that useless cruisers like the maller, the omen, etc, are now proper combat ships is good.
- Boosting combat cruisers (especially the rupture) sounds a little weird to me. They want to make them ok versus BCs ? Isn't a BC specifically designed to kill cruisers in the first place ? Like, destroyers are designed to kill frigates ? I am not even sure it is the case anymore though... This particular points sounds merely like the average escalation buff.
The beautifully sleek shaped Moa has two options, just like the Merlin before it: either close range role with a shield resistance and hybrid turret damage combination, or sniping duty with hybrid turret damage and range synergy.
I wonder why they felt the need to add that little bit of text for this one.
I hate drones though and the Amarr becoming more drone-dependent is making me somewhat of a sadface.
Well, going Amarr and never using the arbitrator hull sounds quite... limitating to me in the first place. If we look at it again they always have added tiny drone focus here and there on amarr ships. True, Minmatar ships that are not dedicated droneboats usually can take more drones than the average combat amarr ship. But you can also find drones on the legion (one of the subs), and also on the sentinel which is a hybrid EW/droneboat like its big brother arbitrator.