sometimes, there's a thing, on the IGS or other places, where a person will do something, and another person will say IC why didn't they do something else, and cite something like a game mechanic, or obscure item.
example, one time, there was a thing with an exchange of prisoners for freed slaves, and the people involved used the "Slaves" ingame item, but at the time, one of them was unaware that more suitable items existed, (kidnapped civilians, Prisoners, refugees, whatever).
unfortunately, many of the items that would be suitable for such rp activities, are mission items, and as such not easy to get a hold of, (or keep hold of), so obtaining items in order to conduct those rp activities, is very hard. Some are very expensive to obtain from contracts, e.g. objects that are ~100m each.
So, what do you do when there's someone using an ingame item, and a more suitable thing exists ? do you challenge them about it, thus possibly embarrassing them about their knowledge of obscure ingame items ? do you play along with their idea that object X is actually object Y ?
to me, it can seem a bit immersion breaking, to comment that since the objects were Y, instead of X, then character A is being deceitful about things. It seems a bit using the game mechanics to say someone is wrong, without necessarily much IC evidence to do so.
Is it reasonable to expect a player to spend much of their ingame time/funds to obtain items just to avoid such comments? does it add anything to enjoyment of rp ?
?