My statements above are roughly meant to convey that something modern in the same vein as something ancient does not an equivalent make, and that I am not qualified to articulate the sum total of the import of the platform and as such will go with what the framers and intellectual forerunners have been going with, trusting that there's either sufficient reason or little point. After all, we're squabbling over a single syllable. A neologism may inspire hatred for being a neologism, but in the end the vernacular's just that.
But, on the former of those...Explaining the core concepts of modern macroengineering to a roman engineer would provide different results than explaining them to the engineering students of today, and similarly, the thought processes of humanists at the time humanism was founded are not congruent to those of transhumanists anymore than the neo-conservatives in the US are the same as conservatives, or the democrats of today are the same as dixiecrats.
Shit changes.