You can call it a weak excuse, but I happen to maybe reason differently at times. It's also a problem of communication.
Lyn, Silver expressed my thought better and with more information than I did, but I'll try to clarify.
Everyone has a certain style of reading and thinking. It seems to me that you have a propensity for sometimes coming up with meanings from a person's statements that others do not. I don't think that it's a cheap shot to point out that this is a meta-style that can persist over locations. I'm sure that you could find similarities between my writing and the writing I do as my character, and I'll admit that many of them have even been frustratingly difficult to alter.
But when I read many of your posts, I have to admit that a recurring perception of
mine is "how did he get that out of that?", or "I don't think that the person he's responding to meant to offend, or to imply offense."
If I were doing this, the only motivation I could ascribe to myself was an intention to cause conflict. However, reading some of your subsequent replies, this does not in fact seem to be the case. You do apparently have other motivations, and while I have trouble appreciating them, perhaps, I can certainly recognize that they exist and are valid to you.
Now, this all could very well be me. I'm not always the best at extracting social cues. It could be that there is often an undercurrent of hostility that I simply miss or am unaware of. If this is in fact the case, I would not be averse - if you would not be bothered - in a little instruction as to what I am missing. But it could also be that my perception is at least somewhat accurate, and thus, might be worth consideration.