While I applaud the effort, my biggest issue is how you are trying to integrate various canon fiction into non-canon articles that show a limited understanding of said canon.
The Apocrypha event in particular irks me. Adding a disaster to an otherwise excellent story of Sisters of EVE calling a ceasefire in a system is brilliant; using a Seyllin-like event without understanding much about stars or mentioning the destruction of all orbital facilities (which would include a 24th Imperial Crusade station)...
Well, let's start simple. Halmah is a K7 orange star. This can be found with a simple search in-game, or looking it up on dotlan. This is important as the "Apocrypha" name for the event, as described in Templar One, was placed on the event in a "secret" CONCORD report, and it was specifically stated that Class-O stars were struck. They were main-sequence CME anomalies; meaning, huge flares. While these can actually happen in K7 orange stars, the Apocrypha event was special because multiple stars had massive CME events at the same time.
Yes, CCP kind of dropped the ball.
So, to recap:
A. One star wouldn't be an "Apocrypha" event.
B. Orbital facilities being destroyed would include a station in-game.
C. The star in question is nowhere similar to Seyllin.
D. The story would be excellent without a mention of "Apocrypha" events.
E. Other than the above issues, the article was excellent. Toning down the scope of the disaster would have made it really shine, without stretching suspension of disbelief.
Again, good initiative. I do have serious problems with the content of the articles. Don't try so hard to link your stories to canon events, because to put it bluntly, your writing could outshine anything CCP has produced just due to your own creativity.
Good luck, and be warned; I will totally blast future lapses in research on the IGS, in-character, no holds barred. Not a threat, but a challenge.