Firstly, I just want to say that I have no formal education in the field of sociology or anthropology, but I find these kinds of discussions incredibly fascinating when relating to our own mindset when role-playing a character.
I think before one can even touch upon the notion of whether a person's effectiveness in representing a culture/society is accurate, the actor and the audience both must have a general understanding of these defining characteristics in mind before rendering judgement. If we inject real world interpretations of what a society is (a body of people living in a system), versus its culture (defining characteristics of a body of people), we can appreciate that a culture can permeate through many societies. I think this clarification is useful when trying to approach similar discussions had recently about the Nature of the Angel Cartel and whether they are simply a 'society' or are a society with a unique culture (ie., are they noted for having a unique method of thought, a defining language, or is it all borrowed from other cultures?)
If we take this into consideration, what are the dominant cultures of New Eden? And more importantly, what defines these cultures?
The Gallente Federation, for instance, is a society of people united under a common legal and economic standard across several cultures. The dominant cultures that we are aware of are the Gallentean culture, the Intaki Culture, and the Jin-Mei culture. These are, by no means equal in influence, but I believe they all make an impact on society as a whole.
People have often said that the Gallenteans have no real distinct culture, but I believe that its similarities to RL western society are abundant to the point that we almost can't make the distinction. Just a quick glance at the description of the Federation from the new character intros, we see:
♦ Only true democracy in New Eden
♦ welcomes outsiders
♦ Financially Prosperous
♦ accepting of other cultures and races
♦ Pioneers of artificial intelligence
♦ manned by bravest men in New Eden (especially known in the universe for their bravery)
♦ intolerant of closed societies (Caldari State, Amarr Empire)
♦ Fierce defenders of personal and social liberties
It's pretty obvious here which qualities are similar to ours in the Western world, but the real question is whether these values infect the mindset of characters/players trying to roleplay cultures largely foreign from ours?
Let's take the Amarr Empire under the same circumstances, information gleaned from the introduction and video for their society:
♦ largest and oldest of the four empires
♦ Ruled by a god-empress
♦ theocratic society (<--society, not culture)
♦ committed great evil and selfless acts in the name of their God
♦ society is supported by slave labor (<--cultural descriptor)
♦ Amarrian citizens are often highly educated and fervent individuals
♦ view slavery as a path of spiritual enlightenment
♦ Most stable and powerful nation in New Eden, despite recent setbacks in history
Now, just a brief examination of both of these societies and cultures displays clearly defined characteristics that differentiate the two, which is where we glean our stereotypes from, but there is more to a culture than just these key points. A culture could be defined by language, history, learning style, art, architecture, and most of this is largely based on individual interpretive thinking.
Do we really know (outside of reading some books or chrons) how the Amarrian culture enjoys to laugh? What are their outlooks on life and what are some general ideas about their taste in music? These things may never be answered, but we as "immersioneers" find ourselves asking the question and ultimately taking a plunge in defining what's useful/interesting to us.
So I suppose the question is: What about each of the cultures do you feel is 'westernized' from how it should really be and how true is our style to that of the tiny bits of canon that we're fed?