Backstage - OOC Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

That many tattoos in EVE are nano-tattoos created with microchips implanted in the skin, programmed to react to the wearer's emotional state? Read more here.

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Planetary size comparison  (Read 5586 times)

Jace

  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Planetary size comparison
« Reply #30 on: 05 Oct 2014, 07:56 »
The magic's in meeeee, the magic's in youuuuu.
Logged

Elmund Egivand

  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 773
  • Will jib for ISK
Re: Planetary size comparison
« Reply #31 on: 05 Oct 2014, 11:21 »
Quote from: Jace on 05 Oct 2014, 07:56
The magic's in meeeee, the magic's in youuuuu.

Barrage Rounds Are Magic
Logged
Deep sea fish loves you forever

Esna Pitoojee

  • Keeper of the Harem
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2095
Re: Planetary size comparison
« Reply #32 on: 06 Oct 2014, 10:07 »
Quote from: Ollie on 05 Oct 2014, 06:37
That and "scifi/space magic" for an IC explanation? :)

Frankly, I don't bother with an IC explanation when there's something this dumb going on. My IC explanation is "the planets are actually reasonably-sized planets with some minor variation in size but not enough to break the laws of physics or biology."

Honestly, you want an IC explanation? "Your Neocom is displaying faulty data." That's about as close as I get.
Logged
Quote from: Arvo Katsuya on 20 Sep 2010, 11:09
I like the implications of Gallentians being punched in the face by walking up to a Minmatar as they so freely use another person's culture as a fad.

Elmund Egivand

  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 773
  • Will jib for ISK
Re: Planetary size comparison
« Reply #33 on: 06 Oct 2014, 19:57 »
Quote from: Esna Pitoojee on 06 Oct 2014, 10:07
Quote from: Ollie on 05 Oct 2014, 06:37
That and "scifi/space magic" for an IC explanation? :)

Frankly, I don't bother with an IC explanation when there's something this dumb going on. My IC explanation is "the planets are actually reasonably-sized planets with some minor variation in size but not enough to break the laws of physics or biology."

Honestly, you want an IC explanation? "Your Neocom is displaying faulty data." That's about as close as I get.

But everybody's Neocom displays that same data.

I should say the best explanation is 'Our Planetologists were University of Caille students and they were high as a kite when they gave us these data'.
Logged
Deep sea fish loves you forever

Jace

  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Planetary size comparison
« Reply #34 on: 06 Oct 2014, 21:04 »
Quote from: Elmund Egivand on 06 Oct 2014, 19:57
I should say the best explanation is 'Our Planetologists were University of Caille students and they were high as a kite when they gave us these data'.

I support this explanation.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »