I'd like to hear people's thoughts about this. To my mind it explains a hell of a lot and is one of the richest resources to come along in ages, but it certainly moves the Caldari a few steps further away from ye olde liberal democracy-socialized comfort zone. (My ethical programming is SO Gallente.)
It's probably not only you. I think there's always been efforts both in the past and currently where the more negative aspects of the State as viewed through a modern liberal lens have been ignored to make it more "comfortable". I mean if a player wants something close to their modern comfort zone I tend to wonder why even roll a Caldari in the first place and go with Gallente instead? You wouldn't even have needed the current demographics article to at least get an inkling of what the State is like, just look at the "Dissenters" background for Civire:
The
cold discipline of Caldari society does not appeal to everyone, nor is everyone happy with the
stranglehold that corporate rulers have on everyday life. While not outright rebellious, dissenters nonetheless invest considerable time and effort in trying to change the system from within.
The State keeps a close eye on these individuals.
Does that read anything like being close to a liberal-democracy. In fact the very use of the the term "Dissenter" implies to me a particular type of disagreement between authority and individuals. Did no one seriously ever ask themselves questions until now of, "Why isn't the cold discipline of Caldari society appealing?" or, "What exactly is the nature of this stranglehold corporate rulers have over everyday life in the State?" or, "So why does the State keep a close eye on dissidents?"
To me the answer is simple, because that background description has been fundamentally unchanged since 2003 as far as I'm aware the only conclusion I can come to is that those questions were not asked in favour of players attempting to put on the rose-tinted glasses with the State in order to try and reconcile it with their own particular Western mindsets. Hell, the only reason I find Ishukone so terrible these days is because it's the obvious product of those attempts to do so and which TonyG also seems to have fallen into, where the word, "Liberal" to describe the political faction means it's a haven of Cal-America with apple pie, to the point that it now looks like the red-headed bastard child Megacorp. preaching freedom, love and tolerance in an utterly cold and ruthless State instead of being the Megacorp. that just uses good PR in foreign markets to trick the foreigners to buy their goods because they can't get an acceptable market share in the State having to compete with much larger entities like SuVee and Kaalakiota.
It's also much the same reason where those same rose-tinted glasses failed to construct that while yes, Tibus Heth was no doubt trying to construct his own vision of a Fascist State with himself as the Dictator the entire rise of his power could be seen not only as being due to the nationalism of the New Meritocracy but that Tibus Heth, the New Meritocracy and the CPD was about the closest the State came to an "Caldari Spring" in which those dissenters, non-citizens and labour movements finally sought to topple a deeply entrenched corporate middle-class in the State which yes, probably was corrupt and self-serving.
The irony here being that player and CCP rejection of Heth and the CPD simply means the re-assertion of the Caldari State as essentially
a corporate police state that it always was prior to the existence of Heth and the CPD. Whose fundamental elements are now outlined in said Caldari Demographics article. Certainly, if such doesn't appeal well I suppose there's always TonyG's vision of Ishukone or the Gallente Federation for those Caldari characters and players that want to play closer to the comforts of modern liberal-democracy, no?