Backstage - OOC Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

When level 4s first came out, they used the Belt NPCs and not the lesser Complex NPCs?

Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado  (Read 6341 times)

Misan

  • Shady Thukker & Ninja Admin
  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 612
    • Serious Thukking Business - Blog

http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=3001

Quote
We couldn‘t just give the Minmatar a new ship and leave the other factions out (NPC military escalation doesn’t work like that), so, in the spririt of mutually assured destruction,  each of the factions have sent their best engineers and scientists to the drafting boards and will also be rolling out a new tier 3 battlecruiser.

„But isn‘t the Tornado a battleship?“

According to the original concept it was, yes. But when reviewing the armadas of existing ships we came to the conclusion that it would make much more sense to add another tier of battlecruisers instead of a fourth battleship tier, and that the accessibility of bc skills would mean more of these ships might be in the hands of younger, brasher pilots. That means more pew pew pew overall.

What sets these new battlecruisers apart from their lower tier cousins?

The most unique thing about them is that they will be able to fit battleship-sized weapons. Yes, you heard correctly... battlecruisers with oversized guns.

They will be capable of similar damage output as a battleship but obviously all that damage comes at a price.They won‘t be able to tank like a battleship, but what they lack in the tanking department the right pilot should be able to somewhat make up for  with speed and distance management. Those looking to start minmaxing fleets of TÖTALHELLDEATH will have to wait a bit for the stats.

The concept is; violent, fast and fun.

In the following weeks we will be introducing the Tornado‘s three counterparts. Stay tuned!

This is going to be very very interesting.  :yar:
Logged
EVE Blog and Project Status: on hold -- busy being Thukker-esque IRL.
Twitter
What I'm busy with, if you're curious.

Helen Ohmiras

  • Guest
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #1 on: 21 Oct 2011, 09:12 »

Quote
The concept is; violent, fast and fun.
I need a new pair of pants.
Logged

Bacchanalian

  • Omelette
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 449
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #2 on: 21 Oct 2011, 09:13 »

Hurr.  The Caldari version with cruise missiles is simply going to replace the Drake as the new meta unless they make the tank weaker and make it a lolhybrid boat.  And even then if they buff railguns.  And these are going to make battleships even more obsolete unless they wind up costing more to build.
Logged

orange

  • Dex 1.0
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1930
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #3 on: 21 Oct 2011, 10:18 »

These should probably be glass cannons as much as possible.  I am thinking along the lines of only being able to have a tank roughly the same range as a cruiser built to tank.
Logged

Jade Constantine

  • Anarchist Adventurer
  • Omelette
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 432
  • Nothing ever burns down by itself
    • The Star Fraction Communications Portal
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #4 on: 21 Oct 2011, 10:27 »

These should probably be glass cannons as much as possible.  I am thinking along the lines of only being able to have a tank roughly the same range as a cruiser built to tank.

Its basically the analogue of WW2 Battlecruisers - they have battleship guns on slightly oversized cruiser bodies. Makes sense to me :)
Logged

There are some arenas so corrupt that the only clean acts possible are nihilistic

Desiderya

  • Guest
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #5 on: 21 Oct 2011, 10:31 »

It's labelled T3. So I guess there'll be a world of difference between the loss of a T1 battleship and a T3 BC.

Also I imagine the caldari one being something that utilizes torpedoes pretty well.
Logged

Sakura Imoru

  • Wetgraver
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 57
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #6 on: 21 Oct 2011, 10:34 »

It's labelled T3. So I guess there'll be a world of difference between the loss of a T1 battleship and a T3 BC.

Also I imagine the caldari one being something that utilizes torpedoes pretty well.

No, not T3, but Tier 3. It will be a Tech-1-ship
Logged

Ryven Krennel

  • Wetgraver
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 55
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #7 on: 21 Oct 2011, 11:00 »

People keep getting T3 and Tier 3 mixed up.  Tier 3 is T1.  A tier 3 battleship is a Maelstrom or Abaddon, Rokh, or Hype.  All T1 but 3rd tier.  Very significant difference.  The tornado is a tech 1 ship.
Logged

Victoria Stecker

  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 752
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #8 on: 21 Oct 2011, 11:06 »

These should probably be glass cannons as much as possible.  I am thinking along the lines of only being able to have a tank roughly the same range as a cruiser built to tank.

This could have hilarious results for the Gallente - a fast ship with large blasters? Yes please.
Logged

Silver Night

  • Admin
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2250
  • Elitist Oldtimer
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #9 on: 21 Oct 2011, 12:06 »

Ninja Hybrid fix?


Sounds promising, but we'll have to wait and see for stats. I'm kind of imagining a Hurricane with BS ACs, and wondering how it won't be OP if it is at all fast.  :D

Desiderya

  • Guest
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #10 on: 21 Oct 2011, 16:02 »

It's labelled T3. So I guess there'll be a world of difference between the loss of a T1 battleship and a T3 BC.

Also I imagine the caldari one being something that utilizes torpedoes pretty well.

No, not T3, but Tier 3. It will be a Tech-1-ship

And I was wondering why there was no (rightful) outcry about T3s. Thanks, that makes actually a lot sense.
Logged

Lydia Tishal

  • Wetgraver
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 71
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #11 on: 21 Oct 2011, 17:33 »

So, they are finally going to add actual battlecruisers to the game? About time. :)
Logged

Seriphyn

  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2118
  • New and improved, and only in FFXIV
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #12 on: 22 Oct 2011, 06:33 »

So, they are finally going to add actual battlecruisers to the game? About time. :)

Someone's got their naval knowledge :3

CCP Navigator and a CSM says the Gallente battlecruiser is teh awesome. Good day to be Minmatar/Gallente-trained \o/
Logged

Robert Kauliford

  • Clonejack
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 28
    • Symon's Blog
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #13 on: 22 Oct 2011, 06:47 »

Oh hell yes  :D

And yes the idea of the tier 3 being glass cannons is spot on for what BCs should be

* Robert Kauliford tries to dig up the post it saying 'BCs should pack BS guns'
Logged

Morwen Lagann

  • Pretty Chewtoy
  • The Mods
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3427
    • Lagging Behind
Re: [Devblog] Ship-troduction: the minmatar tornado
« Reply #14 on: 22 Oct 2011, 09:57 »

I'm gonna miss telling people the Tempest is the best Minmatar battlecruiser if this holds true. :lol:

Can't wait to see what the other three look like.
Logged
Lagging Behind

Morwen's Law:
1) The number of capsuleer women who are bisexual is greater than the number who are lesbian.
2) Most of the former group appear lesbian due to a lack of suitable male partners to go around.
3) The lack of suitable male partners can be summed up in most cases thusly: interested, worth the air they breathe, available; pick two.
Pages: [1] 2 3