I've never bought into the idea that tube children are geneticly engineered on any level. There is no PF to support it and the Jovians would shit a brick.
I imagine the Statics would have brick-shaped kittens, yup. The Modifiers? Dunno. Who knows -- they might be running projects on 'normals' themselves, trying to reverse engineer the disease that's killing them (incidentally, that'd make more sense to me than whatever the Jove were up to with the Elders).
Side Note to the Universe: despite what I think might be reasonable from a fictional perspective, I REALLY don't want to encourage players to start turning up with "I was a Jove genetic experiment!" backgrounds. Seriously. 'Cause, y'know, I can't see the Jove letting their mice out of their labs, even if that mouse did manage to pick up Hacking V, Cloaking V, and Jovian Interceptor X.
Is there screening and compatibility comparisons done? Of course. There are probably even breeding programs designed to produce certain results. There is probably even cloning done on ova and zygotes to produce even more children too, but there is no PF that supports actual modifying of the genetic code.
Agreed, but I don't rule out gene
therapy, even to the level of germ line alterations. Not that I think it's universal: for example, Amarrians (unless they're "morally compromised" and wealthy enough to get away with it) probably frown on having things like, oh, phenylketonuria or congenital adrenal hypoplasia deleted from their genetic lines. Nor do I believe therapy's universally available, or in cases where it is available, it's of uniform quality, particularly in the post-natal realm.
Another Side Note to The Universe: No matter how ditzy or demented a Gallente socialite may be, I just can't see her skipping to a doctor and ordering a fuzzy black spotted hot pink kitty-monkey baby. No way, no how, and I'd be the first to give that kid a knife when he grows up enough that he wants to stab his mommy in the head. Can I see projects like Shin's Tierjiev clade? Yup. Or Lai Dai's wanting to filter out possible genetic-based communication impedances (e.g. artifacts from the autism spectrum) from an otherwise mundane potential scientist breeding program? Oh, sure, these things would crop up in screening and could be dealt with by scrapping the child -- but if everything else in the genetic profile is viable, why toss the child instead of simply removing the undesired aberrations?
Now disappearing before somebody gets the idea to split this thread.