Backstage - OOC Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Signatories to the Federal Charter retain the legal right to regulate shipping and security in their original territories, among other things? Read more here.

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Ankh fired  (Read 7282 times)

Casiella

  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3723
  • Creation is so precious, and greed so destructive.
Re: Ankh fired
« Reply #30 on: 11 Jul 2010, 21:54 »
I didn't really vote based on views matching. That is, I wanted somebody to see EVE reasonably close to how I do, but the ability to communicate and cooperate mattered at least as much.

So, for the last two elections, I've supported TeaDaze. Happy with my choice.
Logged

Graelyn

  • Ye Olde One
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1349
  • These things just seem to happen...
Re: Ankh fired
« Reply #31 on: 12 Jul 2010, 23:50 »
I will be running for CSM next year.  8)
Logged


If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!

Vikarion

  • Guest
Re: Ankh fired
« Reply #32 on: 13 Jul 2010, 00:12 »
You have my vote.
Logged

lallara zhuul

  • Now with rainbows and butterflies.
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1123
Re: Ankh fired
« Reply #33 on: 13 Jul 2010, 03:49 »
And My BICYCLE!
Logged

Be the Ultimate Ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today!

Saede Riordan

  • Immoral Compass
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2656
  • Through the distorted lens I found a cure
    • All the cool hippies have tumblr
Re: Ankh fired
« Reply #34 on: 13 Jul 2010, 06:49 »
And MY Trout!
Logged
Personal Blog//Character Blog
A ship in harbour is safe, but that's not what ships are built for.

DeadRow

  • Bit of a Dick
  • Omelette
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 280
  • Loyal to herself
Re: Ankh fired
« Reply #35 on: 13 Jul 2010, 07:22 »
And My Back-Alley Services!


OT: Can't say I'm sad about the news. Never cared about Ankh's ideas and/or whining.
Logged




[12:40:50] Kasuko Merin > He has this incredible talent for making posts at people that could be <i>literally</i> quoted straight back at him and still apply.

Lillith Blackheart

  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 533
Re: Ankh fired
« Reply #36 on: 13 Jul 2010, 08:33 »
After having read the meeting minutes, it is fairly obvious that Ankh is in game design, as her presentation was the only one that seemed to have all of its ducks in a row based on the breakdown of topics. The rest had the action points of "CSM Will collect X information and submit to CCP" where "X Information" is shit they should have had to begin with.

And also why CSM is useless.
Logged

Mithfindel

  • (a.k.a. Axel Kurki)
  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
Re: Ankh fired
« Reply #37 on: 13 Jul 2010, 17:21 »
Trebor is/was also in the game business. His platform was good, but ultimately might be outside the scope of the CSM as well as being something CCP well knows, but with no new answers to the problem (break up blobs). Haven't read the minutes of regular CSM meetings to see if he has a clue on EVE.
Logged

Lillith Blackheart

  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 533
Re: Ankh fired
« Reply #38 on: 13 Jul 2010, 17:43 »
From what I read his presentation was very good but had no answers, only "These are all problems that need to be addressed", and didn't appear (the minutes weren't incredibly detailed) to have a good list of what balance issues were really major issues.
Logged

Casiella

  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3723
  • Creation is so precious, and greed so destructive.
Re: Ankh fired
« Reply #39 on: 13 Jul 2010, 18:10 »
I don't expect the CSM to have real answers, other than maybe a pass at an idea. They don't have to be professional game developers, of course, any more than we need to be professional SF writers to know that The Empyrean Age was a steaming turd. The real value in thinking about solutions is to prevent unadulterated whinefests without having given serious thought to the causes of the problem. For the most part, CSMs strike me as having given problems the thought they deserve.

Stakeholders should provide input on general direction and validation of plans, not specific and overly detailed design docs.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »