Hi there,
I would tend to think of this as a Corporate Board with major and minor players. The majors would usually dominate (one ISK, one vote kind of board), but would not always see eye-to-eye. In some cases, smaller independent corps start throwing some small but tie-breaking weight around, perhaps gaining a lot of favour in the political horse-trading.
I know I am thinking parliament right now, about the way some small parties influence things just by existing and having a handful of seats. To do this in a democracy, you have but to register, have your loyal, extremist following and wait for the right time. (I am also thinking Meet Joe Black and secret board deals)
I believe the English word would be a King-maker?
In a corporate world, maybe a Corp would have but to register to CEP and play the Big Eight's game. Whether the right moment (and windfall) arrives sometime, it would depend on the political manoeuvring - it may last all of fifteen minutes, but played right, that one corp's vote could shape the future.
Does it make any sense?
Q