Backstage - OOC Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The Wiyrkomi megacorporation is known for the trustworthiness and stubborn patriotism of the founding Seituoda family, who are still thought to own the controlling interest in the company?

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 21

Author Topic: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC  (Read 49402 times)

Arista Shahni

  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 534
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #255 on: 25 Sep 2013, 08:22 »

For the record, I wasn't fishing, I don't want it to come off that way, and I'm about to say a couple Things, and it's not me trying to toot my horn either, just facts, as I still try and assemble my thoughts, trying to drift back to my original point, which boils down to tl;dr "self reflection".

I'm a writer.  I'll fix that - I'm an author (as the stuff was 'published', albeit in tiny venues), the stuff won me scholarships at university etc.  Back when AOL had that five minute author section they used to have these fifty word writing contests on subjects that I'd get mentions and wins in without really trying.  I was writing spaceship stories when I was seven years old, which sounds like a bullshit story, but I could even make my mom get on teamspeak one day and state this as True (as she is an expert in all things me), redbox D&D in the fifth grade then it was off to AD&D to giggle at the heresy which was the Monster Manuals, Gaming Conventions (the tabletop versions, not the PCgaming kinds) LARPing in college running around in the woods... I know I'm not alone here in this ranking of 'total fantasy nerd', and a lot of us could geek out for hours telling stories.  Despite my inability to type anymore these days, I do have the experience to write, to weave a story, to create consistent characters (as well as most do in RP,  anyway.  It is a very dynamic environment for them to exist in, as they can often run into things that the author of the character could have never anticipated, leading to some possibly 'out of character' reactions.)

In conclusion to that line of thought - I'm an experienced RPer and gamemaster -- in tabletop, MMOs, open-room plaintext, forum-style, and costumed live-action.  It means that not only do I know the sorts of communities that can pop up inside of these environments, I also know what needs to be done to make sure I come under notice (or scrutiny, as not everyone fits in everywhere), and used to, long ago, be the one sitting a bunch of angry people in a cabin at 4am on a Sunday going  "Look, I don't care who said what or who slept with who, don't you DARE bring this shit into our fantasy world and ruin it for the five of you and the fifty plus outside of this building - leave the fucking real world behind and keep your in characters and out of character shit separate."

Maybe it is just another facet in the "Eve is not an easy game", as the meta comes into play just as often here as everywhere, and though there are degrees, on the normal bellcurve of gaming humanity we're all definitely not candidates for player of the year on Hello Kitty Online.  There was another huge thread on this topic already, how to disseminate the difference between an "in character action" (Someone emoted at me or posted at me on the IGS) and the in mechanics actions (Someone violenced my spaceboat or robbed the hangars), and maybe the issue is this sort of thing is never really going to be resolved into a single school of thought, as there is actually two, both equally valid and used, and all of us have different focuses on which is done more.  As in, for example "I can help you on this mission but it'll be OOC." - which as we kow, violates a Rule.  Your boat is there, you are IC.

"EVE RP" when I first started playing, and what I've found outside of people on Backstage (people who don't consider themselves tabletop types) is playing EVE and knowing the lore.  If you have those two things you are a silent protagonist in your own story, or if the silence is broken, it is because you are interacting with Capsuleers, who have "their own society".  No one needs to worldbuild it in a document, it's built -- it's there, on the EVE cluster, in countless official and corporate forums and voicecomms.  RP is not dead in EVE, it's very, very alive. It is a bunch of Capsuleers living Capsuleer lives and not caring about anything else - which is sort of what they're written to be, so it's all quite canon.  They either don't consider what they do as RP because it's not *emote I do stuff, they just DO it, or they do realise they RP every day, but just don't want to get involved in chatroom stuff. 

Whether we're making a good example or a bad example is irrelevant because the roleplayers, all of them, without exception, are THE EXAMPLE, because we're such just a painful minority.  Whatever labels we want to put on each facet of each different group's RP style or RL likes and dislikes, we're tiny fish in a literal sea of other people on the server, and we're all grouped together because of that.

This isn't a yell to be good or stop being bad, again, because there is no basis of comparison in the wide world of EVE to compare every 'group' to.  In essence we're all 'fringe' groups to each other and as a whole we are a single 'fringe' group to EVE.  The same usual crap we've all dealt with in every other MMO (and if someone reading this hasn't RPed in an MMO before, yes, this shit happens everywhere).

But when we cry "RP is dying" .. it's best to wonder why.  Cause last I checked, everyone posting here is still alive.  And the end result of that why should not be to lay a blame game, because in all of the shit that has come up and happened it doesn't matter whose fault it is, it only matters to fix it or find a way to live with it.  Every single one of us does this for a personal motive, though there may be altruism in places, no one here is a martyr, and those who are, well, martyrs have this annoying habit of dying (ie. not playing anymore).   

Took me WAY too many days to get all of that out half cohesively to the point that it's almost a necro statement on all of this.  But I was being ragey. vOv


 



Logged

Alizabeth

  • Egger
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 159
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #256 on: 25 Sep 2013, 15:50 »

Second least desirable of all,  checking in.
I fixed it for you.
« Last Edit: 25 Sep 2013, 15:57 by Isis »
Logged

Silas Vitalia

  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3397
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #257 on: 25 Sep 2013, 18:22 »

fail post. nuuuuuke

« Last Edit: 25 Sep 2013, 18:24 by Silas Vitalia »
Logged

Silas Vitalia

  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3397
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #258 on: 25 Sep 2013, 18:23 »

And the end result of that why should not be to lay a blame game, because in all of the shit that has come up and happened it doesn't matter whose fault it is, it only matters to fix it or find a way to live with it. 

Sorry, I disagree.

"The blame game" is sort of only appropriate in more vague, multi-party arguments where both sides have good points, and there's back and forth and a dialogue.

I'm perfectly happy blaming the shit out of specific people for specific derpery.  One or two people being fuckups is not the community's fault, and the collective group of us shouldn't feel guilty, or do a ton of navel gazing about 'what did we do wrong as a group." Nothing, some people are awful, end of story, full stop.   

Everyone being fuckups is the community's fault, but we aren't anywhere near that, and 90% of us are perfectly happy and play well with others just about all the time.
Logged

Ember Vykos

  • Not so bitter bitter fucking vet...
  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 525
  • I bring nothing to the table.
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #259 on: 25 Sep 2013, 19:20 »

"EVE RP" when I first started playing, and what I've found outside of people on Backstage (people who don't consider themselves tabletop types) is playing EVE and knowing the lore.  If you have those two things you are a silent protagonist in your own story, or if the silence is broken, it is because you are interacting with Capsuleers, who have "their own society".  No one needs to worldbuild it in a document, it's built -- it's there, on the EVE cluster, in countless official and corporate forums and voicecomms.  RP is not dead in EVE, it's very, very alive. It is a bunch of Capsuleers living Capsuleer lives and not caring about anything else - which is sort of what they're written to be, so it's all quite canon.  They either don't consider what they do as RP because it's not *emote I do stuff, they just DO it, or they do realise they RP every day, but just don't want to get involved in chatroom stuff. 


Very good point, and from what I've seen I know of a lot of players that choose to "RP" in this way. I actually started doing that when I first started EVE even though I never realized it until later when I actually did get into the chatroom RP scene.
Logged
[spoiler][/spoiler]

Current active RP character(s) - Kairelle
Past RP characters - Ember Vykos, Simca Develon

Arista Shahni

  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 534
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #260 on: 26 Sep 2013, 09:47 »

And the end result of that why should not be to lay a blame game, because in all of the shit that has come up and happened it doesn't matter whose fault it is, it only matters to fix it or find a way to live with it. 

Sorry, I disagree.

"The blame game" is sort of only appropriate in more vague, multi-party arguments where both sides have good points, and there's back and forth and a dialogue.

I'm perfectly happy blaming the shit out of specific people for specific derpery.  One or two people being fuckups is not the community's fault, and the collective group of us shouldn't feel guilty, or do a ton of navel gazing about 'what did we do wrong as a group." Nothing, some people are awful, end of story, full stop.   

Everyone being fuckups is the community's fault, but we aren't anywhere near that, and 90% of us are perfectly happy and play well with others just about all the time.

Good point, I think I was trying to say we should get past it and play the game already, and as I said, took so long for my post to even get posted it's nearly necrotic.
Logged

Havohej

  • Friendly Neighborhood Forum Admin
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1671
  • Ex-convict
    • EWF Digital Consulting
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #261 on: 26 Sep 2013, 11:41 »

Second least desirable of all,  checking in.
I fixed it for you.
I don't know who you are or why everyone hates you (though your role in all this recent shit is clear,  I mean I don't know why people hated you before this) but if you and/or your toon are in fact less desirable than me and my Havohej, then I will have to work on this problem... if Shady lets me.  Since I'm probably joining her corp soon.
Logged

Twitter
This is a forum on steroids tbh. The rate at which content worth reading is being generated could get you pregnant.

Andreus Ixiris

  • Omelette
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 414
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #262 on: 30 Sep 2013, 12:12 »

Logged

Lyn Farel

  • Guest
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #263 on: 30 Sep 2013, 12:38 »

What is long overdue ?
Logged

Silas Vitalia

  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3397
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #264 on: 30 Sep 2013, 17:15 »

What is long overdue ?

This thread getting catacomed. BOOM!

Logged

Samira Kernher

  • Soulless Puppet
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1331
  • Ardishapur Victor
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #265 on: 01 Oct 2013, 03:10 »

What is long overdue ?

Neutral, developer-run IC and OOC chat channels. If the developers are going to have a personal presence in the game world, then all players need to have equal opportunity for access. This is not possible in a player-moderated channel. It doesn't matter how professional or not the player moderation is--they are independent, self-governed, and unpaid individuals, without the same kind of professional oversight or enforcement that exists over members of the developer staff.

I am not going to go into my personal opinions about the moderation of Summit/OOC, as they're irrelevant here. The fact is, that if the developers are going to be interacting with the community then they need to be doing so through inclusive developer-moderated mediums, not player-moderated ones. That being said, if the developers are going to operate developer-moderated mediums, then they should make the effort to hire actual, full-time moderators for these mediums to enforce appropriate behavior (primarily to prevent harassment). They should not leave the channels "flying in the breeze".

I believe an exception can and should exist for one-off player events, when the actor characters are individually invited/reserved in advance specifically for the event in question (like the way SOE's live events team worked in SWG). CCP Falcon's messages so far indicate only a removal from general channels like Summit and OOC, and to my knowledge don't specifically preclude attendance from other player events.
« Last Edit: 01 Oct 2013, 03:49 by Samira Kernher »
Logged

Lyn Farel

  • Guest
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #266 on: 01 Oct 2013, 03:31 »

Oh yes, I agree.

Though while still very unsure if they can or cannot anymore interact specifically ICly with specific people or on specific channels here and there... I can understand it for characters actors in player run channels since I had the same issue in the past with Soter monopolizing all actor attention and keeping everything for themselves (not his/their fault, it was CCP's fault not to remedy to the situation by reaching other people as well).

But for factional contacts that can be contacted by everybody, it would be a real shame.
Logged

Samira Kernher

  • Soulless Puppet
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1331
  • Ardishapur Victor
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #267 on: 01 Oct 2013, 03:50 »

I believe Falcon has said that the actors are still contactable by mail and that this won't change.
Logged

Esna Pitoojee

  • Keeper of the Harem
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2095
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #268 on: 01 Oct 2013, 09:56 »

I believe an exception can and should exist for one-off player events, when the actor characters are individually invited/reserved in advance specifically for the event in question (like the way SOE's live events team worked in SWG). CCP Falcon's messages so far indicate only a removal from general channels like Summit and OOC, and to my knowledge don't specifically preclude attendance from other player events.

It's been indicated to us that actors are at this point prohibited from communicating via a player-run channel for any reason, including player-run events. To say this is a less-than-optimal situation is an understatement.
Logged
I like the implications of Gallentians being punched in the face by walking up to a Minmatar as they so freely use another person's culture as a fad.

Gottii

  • A Booty-full Mind
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1024
Re: CCP Falcon: Live from OOC
« Reply #269 on: 01 Oct 2013, 10:19 »

Logged
"Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'"
― Isaac Asimov
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 21