Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Mithfindel]

Unless, of course, the site would have a beacon visible on the overview (such as the current scenery sites, or like the Republic Fleet cyno in Colelie).

[Morwen Lagann]

Not sure if there's GM tools for that, but personally, having on-demand deadspace scenery to use would be great. Or even some of the fluff sites there are on some system - right now most of them are ruins, but there could be some that were "active, living" sites and stations for baseliners in addition to the COSMOS and similar sites.

If they had tools like this working and stable, I expect that they would've been using them already.

[Mithfindel]

Actually, I do think there are some limited tools on spawning things like LCOs, but building complete sites is hard. Essentially to really work that'd need a tool that would allow you to place ready-made templates of things and then wipe them afterwards (assuming they all weren't blow up anyway).

[Lithium Flower]

At some point someone has to crash a ship onto Gallente Prime.

Just gimme cyno, Gimme Cyno, GIMME CYNO !! 

[Galen Darksmith]

At some point, DUST needs to implement the Adama maneuver.

"Just fit for cap recharge, jump to the beacon, launch fighters, and jump out.  If you pancake, I swear to God I will scoop you up and eat you with goddamn syrup and bacon!"

[Esna Pitoojee]

At some point, DUST needs to implement the Adama maneuver.

"Just fit for cap recharge, jump to the beacon, launch fighters, and jump out.  If you pancake, I swear to God I will scoop you up and eat you with goddamn syrup and bacon!"

Do this to a planet under invasion by Sansha, and the cycle shall be complete.

[Silver Night]

I'm jsut headed to bed, but latest news item seems to put the last nails in for the CPD: http://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/world-news/cep-dissolves-state-executor-position-provists/

[Myyona]

I'm jsut headed to bed, but latest news item seems to put the last nails in for the CPD: http://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/world-news/cep-dissolves-state-executor-position-provists/

Translation of the news piece:
"You got it wrong, Tony G. All wrong."

Especially the part where the CEP goes into detail in describing how having an Executor Role is highly "non-Caldari" and "... was a mistake that should have never been made."

[Horatius Caul]

I'm jsut headed to bed, but latest news item seems to put the last nails in for the CPD: http://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/world-news/cep-dissolves-state-executor-position-provists/

Translation of the news piece:
"You got it wrong, Tony G. All wrong."

Especially the part where the CEP goes into detail in describing how having an Executor Role is highly "non-Caldari" and "... was a mistake that should have never been made."

Yep, definitely CCP speaking there, not the CEP.

[Galen Darksmith]

You know, much fun as it can be to give CCP a hard time over something you think they did poorly, it's really amazing how well they actually listen to the playerbase.  I can't think of any other MMO that actually considers player feedback when doing things like moving the story forward, or adopting a stance on microtransactions.  Guess that's why EVE is the only MMO to grow every year since release.   

[Lyn Farel]

A stance on microtransactions ?

[Alain Colcer]

I'm jsut headed to bed, but latest news item seems to put the last nails in for the CPD: http://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/world-news/cep-dissolves-state-executor-position-provists/

Translation of the news piece:
"You got it wrong, Tony G. All wrong."

Especially the part where the CEP goes into detail in describing how having an Executor Role is highly "non-Caldari" and "... was a mistake that should have never been made."

I read that and thought, not sure if its "non-caldari", but given that caldari DO what is neccesary not what is "correct", then it was perfectly acceptable to see a single human having full control of the state at a moment of need.

Therefore, i took the statement as something said by someone negatively affected by the whole Directorate issue.

[Galen Darksmith]

A stance on microtransactions ?

Monaclegate.

[Morwen Lagann]

A stance on microtransactions ?

Monaclegate.

See, I read Lyn's response as a wisecrack about how monoclegate was caused by CCP not understanding the 'micro' part of microtransactions...

[Desiderya]

Hence him talking about "having or adopting a stance" based on feedback. But aren't we in a thread about the Heth arc here?

I'm wondering where he'll turn up, if at all. Just imagine some new "outlaw" subfactions for each empire, the classical pirate ones based on, well, business, the others on ideology.