Hi to all, and sorry for any misspellings.
What Silas said. You don't need the stuff from the book to have a completely rock-solid reason for hating Jamyl as an Amarrian. All the evidence you need was provided in the ingame news way back when.
I just have so much sad face for Amarr loyalists, as no one can take them seriously IC without putting the derp blinders on.
It's really, really, really unfortunate.
Empress corpse or no, everyone with half a brain knows that Jamyl died that day. The body would just be a physical reminder of the fact, and is more of a symbol than anything. Whether or not it is a powerful symbol or not is up to CCP as they control how the people and power-dealers of the Empire would react.
Honestly I'm just waiting for the day I can go Tetrimon and give the finger to the Theology Council.
I think, Spoon Thumb has made long time ago on the old eve-o forum along and well thought out comment about: How we in-character also know that there is something wrong with Jamyl. Sadly I havent found a link. He had put it very nicely and in better words as I ever can. By the way, if he reads this, thanks for the "Khaldari" term I love it.
Ardishapur Family Criticizes Imperial Educational Standards
Edit: I think it would be useful to double use these threads as a basis for chronicling OOC the events, linking to appropriate threads, to later build the Evelopedia page.
I take some freedom and come back to the amarr arc. I think the amarr arc and the gallente arc have one thing in common and this the question: What would you give up for security and survival. I the amarr arc is the question ones around education in the federation around
"as a breach of their rights, and an invasion of their privacy or civil liberty" (as mention in the speech). I know this summery form me comes VERY SHORT AND DOESNT SHOWS THE WHOLE DEEPNESS. But maybe it helps to come back to the topic. So to easy down the topic. We could form it into a question. The question could be around a
trade-off decision; where we as citizens make a decision around a
indifference curve. Which means we can make decisions along this curve. One side would be "resources (capital, labour) for security and survival" on the other side would be "resources (capital, labour) for something else as security and survival". In the case of the Federation would be this something else: "personal rights, invasion of personal privacy or civil liberty". So that we could ask:
How much of your personal rights, invasion in your privacy or civil liberty would you sacrifice for your security and survival? You as individual and you as a member of this the state (as in the end it is the state, which can give at least a little guarantee). Where were your place in the indifference curve?
______________________
As for the Amarr, it would be education. As the main page said ones, it as something very important for the Amarr (as the old intro mention).
How much of your education would you sacrifice for your security and survival? You as individual and you as a member of this the state (as in the end it is the state, which can give at least a little guarantee). Where were your place in the indifference curve?
____________________
Before you find your personal answer, know that if you choice to put all resources away form "security and survival", that you land in
here. So you cant choose to put all your resources away of "security and survival". But what is with the other extrem? Can you put almost all of your resources in "security and survival"? So maybe that would be my second question, if you find your perfect place in the indifference curve. Say to me, why you not choice to give 1isk more to security and survival?
The speech:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=208117&find=unreadThe article:
http://community.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=5032&tid=2