Backstage - OOC Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

That all Blood Raider commanders receive substantial theological training as well? (The Burning Life, p. 56)

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

Author Topic: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers  (Read 6523 times)

Gesakaarin

  • Guest
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #30 on: 05 Feb 2013, 04:37 »

I find it strange that it's the ones that didn't effectively get their character's and organization's reputations and metaphorical balls caught in the current CBT vice with absolutely no idea of how the dice will fall are the ones that are throwing stones at the whole affair.  :roll:

Nothing at all prevents anyone here from seeking to generate their own RP, arcs, or content because there's factional reps open to be mailed by any player if they wish it, so the only limiting factor as I see it is an unwillingness to participate.
Logged

Jev North

  • Guest
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #31 on: 05 Feb 2013, 04:43 »

I've no doubt the spotlight will swing elsewhere soon.

Me, I've been in the relative background of all this anyway -- just amused how Jevvles went from flying with a bunch of (sorta kinda former) Serpentis loyalists associated with illegal orbital bombardment to a bunch of (very vocal) State loyalists now also associated with illegal orbital bombardment.


balls caught in the current CBT vice

CBT

I laughed. Lots.
« Last Edit: 05 Feb 2013, 04:45 by Jev North »
Logged

Lyn Farel

  • Guest
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #32 on: 05 Feb 2013, 05:08 »

Bleh, most factional blocs always prefer to keep their laundry cleaning private anyway, in the hope to prevent giving the enemy free ammo and let them see the internal in fighting.

And it's better that way, it becomes less tedious to know what's going on (unlike Arek Jalaan or the Sansha invasions that were monopolized by a few chosen players). There is still place for more private secret stuff happening.

Can you go into detail about the bolded part?

It is good to have a certain balance between the public part to make sure that every RPer can interact, and also good to remain open to players for interactions. And between the private part where dedicated players can go into more details and intrigue according to their specific RP.

In the Sansha Invasions in particular, almost the totality of the actors-players interaction was centered around Syne and Soter, for example.

AJ was more open though, but if you were not specifically involved in it, no news, nothing.

The crucial difference here is that we now have NPC contacts to at least bypass that issue a little.
« Last Edit: 05 Feb 2013, 05:19 by Lyn Farel »
Logged

Aelisha Montenagre

  • Guest
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #33 on: 05 Feb 2013, 06:28 »

Thanks jev, the entire first aid training course now wonders what i am snorting with barely suppress laughter at during my lunch...
Logged

Lyn Farel

  • Guest
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #34 on: 05 Feb 2013, 07:22 »

I googled CBT and had no results that could explain the joke :/
Logged

Jev North

  • Guest
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #35 on: 05 Feb 2013, 07:23 »

You probably had Safe Search on. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cock_and_ball_torture_(sexual_practice) . (Very very NSFW, if you couldn't guess from the link.)
Logged

Aquila Shadow

  • Totally not a spy
  • Clonejack
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10
Logged

Lyn Farel

  • Guest
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #37 on: 05 Feb 2013, 08:25 »

You probably had Safe Search on. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cock_and_ball_torture_(sexual_practice) . (Very very NSFW, if you couldn't guess from the link.)

Oh right xD
Logged

orange

  • Dex 1.0
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1930
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #38 on: 05 Feb 2013, 09:09 »

http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=anti-provist-rally-sparks-civil-unrest-on-malkalen-v

Well that's player driven content if iv ever seen it.

 :eek:  Open civil war, here we come...

More comments later, I am already late for my departure to work.

Edit: (Now at work)

Nothing at all prevents anyone here from seeking to generate their own RP, arcs, or content because there's factional reps open to be mailed by any player if they wish it, so the only limiting factor as I see it is an unwillingness to participate.

You have insight into what I have been trying to do.
« Last Edit: 05 Feb 2013, 10:31 by orange »
Logged

Gesakaarin

  • Guest
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #39 on: 05 Feb 2013, 09:10 »

You probably had Safe Search on. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cock_and_ball_torture_(sexual_practice) . (Very very NSFW, if you couldn't guess from the link.)

Veikitamo doesn't always put metaphorical balls in the CBT vice but when she does, she always uses a stick of butter first.
Logged

Sepherim

  • Omelette
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 392
  • Too fucking serious for himself... or not
    • The Chronicles of Sepherim Catillah
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #40 on: 05 Feb 2013, 09:45 »

I must admit I liked the news a lot, specially if it is player driven. :)
Logged

Ghost Hunter

  • Sansha's True Citizen ; TS-F Overseer
  • The Mods
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1374
  • True Power without limit!
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #41 on: 05 Feb 2013, 14:29 »

Bleh, most factional blocs always prefer to keep their laundry cleaning private anyway, in the hope to prevent giving the enemy free ammo and let them see the internal in fighting.

And it's better that way, it becomes less tedious to know what's going on (unlike Arek Jalaan or the Sansha invasions that were monopolized by a few chosen players). There is still place for more private secret stuff happening.

Can you go into detail about the bolded part?

It is good to have a certain balance between the public part to make sure that every RPer can interact, and also good to remain open to players for interactions. And between the private part where dedicated players can go into more details and intrigue according to their specific RP.

In the Sansha Invasions in particular, almost the totality of the actors-players interaction was centered around Syne and Soter, for example.

AJ was more open though, but if you were not specifically involved in it, no news, nothing.

The crucial difference here is that we now have NPC contacts to at least bypass that issue a little.

Ah, I see. I am almost entirely unfamiliar with the interaction difficulties of the Synean side. On the Sansha side we locked down into full paranoid mode to wrestle as much as an advantage over the intelligence war as we could. I'm not certain how many would-be Sansha feel the same about our approach as you do with Syne's.

But, back to the topic on hand...
Logged
Ghost > So yes, she was Ghost's husband-
Ashar > So Ghost was a gay Caldari and she went through tranny surgery
Ghost > Wait what?
Ashar > Ghosts husband.
Ghost > No she was - Oh god damnit.

He ate all of them
We Form Moderation
For Nation

Lyn Farel

  • Guest
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #42 on: 05 Feb 2013, 16:46 »

Syne did the same thing. It was perfectly understandable and logical ICly.

The issue came from the actors, not the players.
Logged

Lyn Farel

  • Guest
Re: Faction Legal Action vs. Capsuleers
« Reply #44 on: 06 Feb 2013, 14:37 »

I like when these events are grey on both sides.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4