If we're not supposed to respond then there is no conversation and the remarks seem a bit pointless.
There are other responses possible than a challenge or argument. I considered the response 'nope' quite unproductive. Did you consider it otherwise?
Given I didn't say 'nope' and given I responded not with a challenge or an argument but rather with information on another IC perspective and with an ancillary OOC perspective, I would have thought the answer is evident.
As to Lillith on 'tangible' relating to 'object-oriented' achievements, I don't altogether agree actually.
But I think this leads us to questions of interpretation and definition. I do agree that Grr was speaking reasonably if, in my arguable view, a little loosely and questionably.
I would note that as SF has a publicly-confirmed titan (and alliance members were intimately involved in the build logistics of that titan, though I personally don't see direct involvement in the build as necessary to the achievement of acquiring a titan) even on Lillith's working definition the outpost is not the first.
The thing about EVE that is so important (even if at times CCP neglect it a little) is that any alliance, corp, or for that matter individual pilot can achieve great things...
...and if anything it is through roleplay that the greatest of achievements can be attained.
If that were not so, personally I wouldn't have played this game for nigh on 6 years.
Cosmo