Warning: Somewhat rambling words below, all loosely orbiting the main point of the thread, and some probably just reiterating what has already been said. But at the same time, what else am I going to do when my evening is earmarked for moving equipment all across New Eden?
I like fiction having endings. Nothing is worse than a story which simply doesn't end. Best are endings where you know that things are still happening, and are going to happen after you close the book, and the author is flatly refusing to tell you. Neil Stephenson likes doing that, and it took me a while to get used to it - but in the end, that's why he's one of my preferred authors.
If Lucas selling to Disney means the we will get stories situated in the Star Wars universe, but not about the Skywalker family plus friends/kids/nieces/old enemies - brilliant! Fresh start, and all that.
I like to relate this to the Star Trek reboot: what JJ Abrams did to the canon - making token amends while behind his back giving it the finger - was long overdue. While I'm no longer active in the Star Trek creative scene, I am keeping loose tabs on it, and the movie reboot did spark a new writing fervor which in the original loosely-canon universe simply wasn't possible.
There is a point in a fictional universe where all relevant stories have been told, and the only remaining choices are a) bury it, or b) restart one similar, but significantly different premise.
Ok, there's always c) milk it to appease shareholders until it's no longer profitable. But I like to think that even executives learn that appearing in the Fortune-10000, and only the Fortune-10000, has long lost its cachet of being 'glamorous'.
As for the concrete outlook of Star Wars under Disney itself, I'm optimistically cautious. "Iron Man" and "The Avengers" have shown me there is hope for the sci-fi/fantasy genre, even in Hollywood hands. I think I'll give SW under Disney two releases to win me over: one to find their footing, the second to deliver.