Wow.
The amount of trashing of Seri for a fairly innocuous comparison is really unfair.
It seems people still get emotional about the 9/11 event, and dont like it being compared to a fictional in-game event.
I dont think Seri was trying to factually compare the evrents, but try to demonstrate how an event and cause a servere emotional reaction in people that lived though it or was around at the time that it happened.
The OOC reference to this event, and not to the fire bombings in Poland, were most likely due to the fact that Seri did not live though those events, like many of us on this board.
I dont see anything wrong with trying to make IRL connections to in game events if it will help you to try understand the complexities of a situation. Hes not saying that the in-game event is factually like 9/11, but the emotional reaction that the populace may have might be similar. If it helps Seri, or others, to understand the fictional world by looking at real life emotional reactions that people have, whats the problem?
The reaction displayed here by people trying to have a go at him, unfairly, because he is trying to rationalise and understand an emotional response in a fictional world is unwarrented.
Nowhere did I see him trying to trivialise the 9/11 attack.
It sort of drives home the point he was making for me.
Edit: A common response to the Caldari/Gallente conflict is "it was justified" or "get over it". Try saying that to someone who has been affected by any modern conflict IRL and see their reaction.