I noticed most of you picked either top-tier hollywood super-idols, or some variant of homosexual/androgynous genderWTF to represent your movie personas. Why? Why didn't anyone pick a single average-looking commoner uggo bastard to play them? If I had anyone in mind to play Istvaan, it'd be Ciaran Hinds because he looks like a bitter miserable creature like I am in real life.
I don't mean this as an insult or anything, I genuinely want to get a feel for this forum.
edit: Jesus, upon further review it seems someone else in this thread picked Ciaran Hinds too. And now I feel like I can't come up with anything original anymore.
I know it's not intellectually very appropriate in a nerd-gasm kind of manner, but I'm tempted to ask "why not?" in response.
I offered an A-list and B-list alternative basically because A) I thought it would be fun (the contrast would add to the information value of choices) and B) because I guessed someone would raise the issue (because, I'm guessing, there is an inherent dislike towards success and fame in nerd-circles which makes an A-list choice somewhat "wrong", which, no matter if any correct or wrong opposition to the subject is present here, these are). The a-listers are good alternatives because they're well known so we share a "language" to communicate in, so to speak. Besides these kinds of answers, I'm kinda stumped who we should be offering as alternatives that would actually be meaningful in any manner.
The "girl next door" is not a very interesting answer, is it?