Le sigh.
Basically all of the regular military across all the nations are the ones that have gone through the socialization of their parents, education and media, and come through as model citizens following the indoctrination of their culture to the letter, they follow it so far that they are willing to join a career which is about killing people that would think otherwise than their culture dictates. Therefore they are easily affected by tools of indoctrination, which military has pretty much perfected, from uplifting music to uniforms, from dehumanization of the enemy to strengthening the belief on what they are doing is right.
You can argue about the defensive aspect of the military, but the military defends by killing the enemy, not by handing them flowers.
Or my favourite, the humanitarian aspect of the military. There is no such animal, military is usually used at the frontline of humanitarian tasks because it is mobile, it has good logistics, plenty of manpower and in a democracy you have to keep the home folks happy.
Still, militarys primary purpose is to kill people.
Most of my previous post addresses this point in a bit flamish way.
Then the other aspects of it.
Like Gallentean social order.
Historically Gallenteans were a monarchy, since most of the relics of the time that such monarchy was around are still intact it can be deduced that the transition from a pure monarchy to a democracy was gradual.
Therefore the nobility that owned the infrastructure of the nation were constantly at an upper hand towards the rest of the society when talking about economic gain.
Personally I draw direct parallels to current Great Britain, most of the land is still owned by the
nobility. Alongside all of this is the educational system, in our world we did not get
public education until the 18th century before that everyone was privately taught for money.
Those private institutions are still running and give the best education in the world to the same families that have sent their children there for centuries (most of the British representatives are from same private schools and know each other from those times.)
Have something similar happening on Gallente Prime and you have an intellectual upper class that was and is the nobility of old guiding things.
Military academies that produce the higher tier of the military also follow a similar system that regular education does.
Within the military you can only advance to a certain rank if you have not gone through one of these military academies.
Basically a regular person joins the military career after going through the regular education system and can reach a certain rank through the inherent meritocracy of the military, while you can only reach the highest ranks of the military if you have started your military career from the day you started your education.
Throw in the quite high possibility of having money backed media and such inequalities are easily hidden away.
As I stated earlier socialization of an individual comes from their parents, education and media.
When the public education system was put together, who defined what was taught there, the intellectual upper class, the economic powers or the people?
After a few generations the socialization done through the education and media starts being fed to the children in their mothers milk in the form of beliefs expressed by the parents, which the child imitates and adopts (sorry guys, when push comes to shove, you are your parents.)
Therefore making perfect soldiers that truly believe the party line and will act accordingly if someone threatens it.
By dehumanizing the enemy and doing whatever they can towards them.
Let's have a few real life examples.
Everyone knows the Abu Ghraib prison, how about
Stanford Prison Experiment?How about
dehumanization through propaganda tools, in Soviet Union, Communist China, pre-WW2 Germany, United States, just about any nation that has ever been in a war.
In case you can't see the links because of the theme :
Dehumanization:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DehumanizationStanford Prison Experiment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experimentLand ownership in UK:
http://libcom.org/news/article.php/land-ownership-right-roam-uk-10032006Current education system:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4UBy the way, it's not only Great Britain that has similar system going on in the background, the system in the States is pretty much the same, same goes for France and Germany as well.
Scandinavia seems to be immune to it at the moment, well as far as I can tell. (My only experience is with Finland, that has Scandinavian culture but lacks the monarchy and the baggage it brings.)
I only used Britain as an example because the player of Seri is part of that society.