How about anti-Federation Gallente. I mean, anti-Federation like they think it should be dissolved, or at the least much more loosely administered. Systems-rights!
It would be, I think, a sort of precarious position to hold, but I could see it attracting a following (well, in a place as big as the Fed, anything might.)
- Why should the member 'states' have to shoulder the cost of a vast Federal navy, when it is mostly used to defend the 'fat cats' and politicians in the core few worlds?
- With the right to vote being taken away in the contested areas, the argument could be made that the Federation is show it's 'true colors', too much centralized power, locals should be able to govern themselves (also, attached 'slippery slope' argument)
- How can a bureaucrat in Villore know what an average Jacques in Solitude needs?
- Any time there is something about a new law being passed, it could be viewed as interference from the bloated central government
- In regards to the Caldari invasion and the Titan, 'core worlds' brought it on themselves, and see point 1 (and also below)
What I'm not sure about is how a group like that would handle the ideas of nationalism and how they would view the Caldari. I might be describing two groups here, in fact (there is a big difference between wanting the federation dissolved and simply wanting more local autonomy).
On the Caldari, I could see some Caldari group funding and promoting a group like this, on the sly, since whichever type it is, the ultimate result of any success of theirs would be a weakening of the Federation.
Also, it seems (from the whole
thing with Intaki) that member states already exercise a pretty big degree of autonomy. Still, there are always going to be people who are dissatisfied. Plus noone likes taxes, and presumably there
are taxes. There is also the fact that the centers of Federation governance are (literally) astronomical distances from the fringes.