Backstage - OOC Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The Vherokior tribe is a splinter tribe from the Starkmanir tribe? For more, read here.

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: So are any role players standing for CSM?  (Read 2818 times)

Jace

  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1215
Re: So are any role players standing for CSM?
« Reply #15 on: 27 Mar 2014, 08:00 »

I'm curious; If you had to make a list of top 5 RP related things in eve you would like to see changed/added what would they be?

You asking for a dream list here, or a realistic list?
Logged

Esna Pitoojee

  • Keeper of the Harem
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2095
Re: So are any role players standing for CSM?
« Reply #16 on: 27 Mar 2014, 10:35 »

I'm curious; If you had to make a list of top 5 RP related things in eve you would like to see changed/added what would they be?

(In no particular order)

1. Restoration of small-scale events involving limited contact with smaller player groups in addition to grand 'battle for X' events. Not only do these not encounter the massive difficulties surrounding huge live events, but they are much more likely to succeed or fail in a meaningful way - i.e., because people on one side or another showed up to reach the objective, rather than huge blobs appearing for tasty kills.

2. Increased production of fiction pieces in general. This includes both chronicles and news stories; personally I would push for more 'slice of life' stories as well - i.e., chronicles that portray things from the view of characters other than, say, leaders of the Big 4 empires - even if involving major events in the cluster (example of this: "Chained to the Sky" involves what was a fairly major news story at the time, but it is shown from the POV of an 'everyman' rather than, say, Jamyl or one of her advisors).

3. Building on the above, increased production of historical and worldbuilding lore would be very nice as well. Some of my favorite articles on EVElopedia from the last few big fiction expansions have been the ones that discussed things we didn't know about in the lore before, and it'd be nice to keep seeing stuff like that.

4. Removal (or at least tempering) of this 'capsuleer groups mysteriously supersede everyone' business. CONCORD and the Big 4 have in the past been shown to be capable of deeply controlling many aspects of capsuleer life and capability; if we want to discuss game mechanics, they still do. If CCP is going insist that capsuleers are somehow 'breaking away' without the express consent of CONCORD/Big4, I would like to see a very good reason why they have not been clamped down on long ago.

5. Overhauls to PvE including an emphasis on making them more 'lore-friendly'; while I recognize that any repetitive PvE will always break lore in some fashion, handling the worst issues would be heavily beneficial (deeply outdated missions, vast numbers of NPCs falling like chumps, and PvE encounters that simply do no make sense, e.g. a Minmatar agent sending me a mission to stop a slave raid... in Amarr space). Best of all, many of these could be dealt with at the same time as the PvE overhauls to make missions more engaging that CCP's been talking about since forever.
Logged
I like the implications of Gallentians being punched in the face by walking up to a Minmatar as they so freely use another person's culture as a fad.

orange

  • Dex 1.0
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1930
Re: So are any role players standing for CSM?
« Reply #17 on: 27 Mar 2014, 11:28 »

3. Some form of yearly 'state of the cluster' wrap up piece (fiction presented as non-fiction) would be nice.  CCP keep playing the 'capsuleers are becoming more willful and free' stance - let's have some form of charting of that and other aspects of this transition from mortal to immortal led society. 

In theory, this already exist.  However, due to some internal policy change what was and could be a community project (the wiki) has turned into a slow burn, highly controlled info repository.

Also, slowly correlating what people build out as their list and then considering putting together a plan proposal to hit various points.  "When bringing light to a problem, always good to have a solution in mind."
Logged

Joshua Foiritain

  • Serpentis Loyalist
  • Wetgraver
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 51
    • Coreli Corporation Mainframe
Re: So are any role players standing for CSM?
« Reply #18 on: 27 Mar 2014, 12:27 »

I'm curious; If you had to make a list of top 5 RP related things in eve you would like to see changed/added what would they be?

You asking for a dream list here, or a realistic list?
Tbh i'm interested in both :)
Logged

Lyn Farel

  • Guest
Re: So are any role players standing for CSM?
« Reply #19 on: 27 Mar 2014, 14:47 »

1) Stop rewriting and retconing PF. Period. Accept one's own mistakes and deal with it. Sweeping stuff under the rug is just playing the ostrich.

2) Daily news events again. If possible by hired competent scenarists / history knowledgeable people / whatever.

3) Intra factional conflict, coldwar state, stop this full, false epicness nonsense that has been going on since TEA. It just makes zero sense anymore.

4) Define once and for all all major and key features of the lore : cloning, jumpcloning, the capsule, skillbooks and memory tampering, access to technology in New Eden, and possibly more hard science that actually focus on the science fiction part of the universe rather than just the politics.

5) Revive minor factions. Not including them in all events and each time focusing instead on a clash between 2 major factions (how boring, not even 3 or more, just 2, always) is just pure artistic laziness.



Also, is there an anti CSM candidate somewhere so that I can eventually vote a last time before my sub runs out ? Last time I voted was CSM 3 I think... You know, a CSM candidate that actually wants to put the CSM down once elected ?
« Last Edit: 27 Mar 2014, 14:49 by Lyn Farel »
Logged

Vincent Pryce

  • Guest
Re: So are any role players standing for CSM?
« Reply #20 on: 27 Mar 2014, 18:21 »

1) Stop rewriting and retconing PF. Period. Accept one's own mistakes and deal with it. Sweeping stuff under the rug is just playing the ostrich.

2) Daily news events again. If possible by hired competent scenarists / history knowledgeable people / whatever.

3) Intra factional conflict, coldwar state, stop this full, false epicness nonsense that has been going on since TEA. It just makes zero sense anymore.

4) Define once and for all all major and key features of the lore : cloning, jumpcloning, the capsule, skillbooks and memory tampering, access to technology in New Eden, and possibly more hard science that actually focus on the science fiction part of the universe rather than just the politics.

5) Revive minor factions. Not including them in all events and each time focusing instead on a clash between 2 major factions (how boring, not even 3 or more, just 2, always) is just pure artistic laziness.

So much +1

The constant retcons, revamps and remodeling of the PF is getting extremely tiresome. This seems to happen every time there's new folks behind the keyboard at the office, as a result the lore has gotten twisted, dry and bland. This has been also one of the major influences to not pick up Source, that and the disappointments the previous books have turned out to be. Anyhow, I'm on tangent here and I don't wanna hijack the thread any further.

Also, is there an anti CSM candidate somewhere so that I can eventually vote a last time before my sub runs out ? Last time I voted was CSM 3 I think... You know, a CSM candidate that actually wants to put the CSM down once elected ?

Hehehe hehe Anti-CSMtism.
Logged

Graelyn

  • Ye Olde One
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1349
  • These things just seem to happen...
Re: So are any role players standing for CSM?
« Reply #21 on: 28 Mar 2014, 02:50 »

I like the CSM. It's damn near worthless, but CCP left to their own devices is often disastrous.

Also, from a personal vanity perspective, since my ISD dramabomb caused the CSM to be formed, I think of it as my legacy of sorts. There sure won't be anything else of permanence.
Logged


If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!

Lyn Farel

  • Guest
Re: So are any role players standing for CSM?
« Reply #22 on: 28 Mar 2014, 13:41 »

I could agree with the CSM concept if people were nominated by CCP.

Though considering all the famous cases of corruptions that occurred over eve history, scratch that actually.
Logged

Ché Biko

  • Space Buddho-Commu-Nihilist
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1166
  • I'll face the stars or the abyss.
    • Biko's Backstage Character Thread
Re: So are any role players standing for CSM?
« Reply #23 on: 07 Apr 2014, 11:25 »

I'm curious; If you had to make a list of top 5 RP related things in eve you would like to see changed/added what would they be?
In no particular order:
  • New Hulk/Covetor. It does not make sense to me that the largest barge/exhumer, build for efficiency/yield, has the least efficient mining turrets.
  • Expand FW/Incursions in such a way that bad guy RP-ers can support their pirate/utopian/other minor factions just like, or similar to, how we can support the major factions.
  • Update the wiki. Especially the yearly summaries.
  • More, smaller Live Events. Two characters chatting in local...the Awakended Infomorph travelling from point a to b unannounced... stuff like that. Or long-term events, kinda like the Arek'Jaalen thing, but less demanding when it comes to dev participation.
  • The never released bits of Incarna.
Logged
-OOChé

Dessau

  • Guest
Re: So are any role players standing for CSM?
« Reply #24 on: 08 Apr 2014, 12:25 »

So... I think this will be the first year since 2009 that I sit out the CSM vote. I'm too out of touch with the direction of the game and don't feel like being involved is going to benefit me any longer.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]