Backstage - OOC Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Re-Awakened Technologies Inc is a Minmatar Republic loyalist corporation? Read more here

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]

Author Topic: Feedback: EVE: Source  (Read 17060 times)

Lyn Farel

  • Guest
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #120 on: 16 May 2014, 04:04 »

Ah, there is that too.

And even funnier, pushing it a bit more far and you basically can't explain scriptures to someone ICly since it would imply using your own words and sentences to describe them. Even literally.
Logged

Nicoletta Mithra

  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #121 on: 16 May 2014, 05:49 »

Of course. All that there is to be said about Scripture is what it does say itself, according to EVE: Source. :< *derp*
Logged

Samira Kernher

  • Soulless Puppet
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1331
  • Ardishapur Victor
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #122 on: 16 May 2014, 06:02 »

I don't really like replying to threads that I've formally backed out of, but this one apparently isn't dying.

Though I largely support Source, on that part I agree that it's a bit iffy but I'm not sure if we want to read into it too literally. Definitive source or not, people make mistakes and there's a few areas where that's clearly done in the book. Especially glaring is the mistaken date of Midular's assassination, where the book claims it was in 113 instead of 115--I don't think anyone here would argue that that was an intentional retcon of the date. It's probable that the writers didn't really think about the implications of that line.

Has anyone asked one of the writers for clarification on if that was the intent? Source is intended to be the baseline moving forward, but it's very, very easy to write something thinking it means one thing only to have it imply something else entirely. I've considered sending a PM about it myself, but I'm not sure I'd be able to phrase the issue as well as other people have.

Of course, if it was intended to be read that way then I have to agree that it was a bad change to make.
Logged

Nicoletta Mithra

  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #123 on: 16 May 2014, 06:11 »

Though I largely support Source, on that part I agree that it's a bit iffy but I'm not sure if we want to read into it too literally.
That one is great! :D

I have pointed out the complications of this line (and others) to a CCP employee asking for opinions on Source while Falcon sat next to him: It got ignored. :(
« Last Edit: 16 May 2014, 06:16 by Nicoletta Mithra »
Logged

Samira Kernher

  • Soulless Puppet
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1331
  • Ardishapur Victor
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #124 on: 16 May 2014, 06:15 »

:(

I'll try sending a PM then. Maybe I'll get better luck.
Logged

Nicoletta Mithra

  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #125 on: 16 May 2014, 06:17 »

As I don't have contact to the CCP employees responsible, I'd appreciate that. One can always try. Crossing fingers for you, here.
Logged

Samira Kernher

  • Soulless Puppet
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1331
  • Ardishapur Victor
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #126 on: 16 May 2014, 06:30 »

Well I don't have any special contact or anything, just PMs on the official forums. Falcon at least definitely had involvement with Source and answered my previous PMs, so I'll send one to him.
Logged

kalaratiri

  • Kalalalaakiota
  • The Mods
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2107
  • Shes mad but shes magic, theres no lie in her fire
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #127 on: 16 May 2014, 10:12 »

I got mine today, in hardback. Having not read it yet, I can only give my opinions of the physical object and god damn CCP know how to make a sexy book.
Logged


"Eve roleplayers scare me." - The Mittani

Nicoletta Mithra

  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #128 on: 16 May 2014, 12:52 »

The physical book isn't at all what CCP made. ^^ If anythin, CCP knows how to choose someone who can make a sexy book. <,<
Logged

Nicoletta Mithra

  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #129 on: 22 May 2014, 17:54 »

:(

I'll try sending a PM then. Maybe I'll get better luck.

Any luck, yet?
Logged

Samira Kernher

  • Soulless Puppet
  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1331
  • Ardishapur Victor
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #130 on: 22 May 2014, 18:04 »

Haven't gotten around to writing it yet. Been a bit busy this week.
Logged

Nicoletta Mithra

  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #131 on: 23 May 2014, 04:06 »

Okay. :)
Logged

Ayallah

  • Kameira
  • Egger
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 207
Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
« Reply #132 on: 04 Jun 2014, 17:43 »

Nothing about Kameiras :(

I still love my book though.  It was nice to have Aya's political assertions and ideals confirmed in source.   

The capsule stuff came as a bit of a shock though. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]