I find your insistence that we can somehow affect any aspect of the storyline whatsoever hilarious.
Perhaps I wasn't clear. Here's a bit more in-depth analysis of my view:
In short, though it's perfectly understandable to expect to be able to affect the storyline, the metaplot shouldn't be changed by players.There are points of interaction, like A'J. As much as I applaud Dropbear's initiative, and as much as I'd like to enjoy and participate actively in A'J, it should never have been implied that it would close the gap in player and character knowledge. It took me a bit of soul searching to realize why exactly I was so on-the-fence about the project, but I think it comes down to the feeling that it was just a means of promoting the Tony Gonzales view of EVE canon fiction. Perfectly fine if this canon view were shared by a majority of players, but in a game that promotes itself as a sandbox, "canned" storyline elements don't seem to fit the big picture. When those canned storyline elements are completely misinterpreted by the players, there's a huge problem.
Let me be clear; Most of the more recent chronicles tie directly into Templar One and The Empyrean Age. They appear to be designed to back up every single 'OMG, where did that come from?' moment.
It was a noble endeavor, but A'J felt, to me, like they were just buying time until Templar One came out. The "mysterious" Chronicles are now easily decipherable when put into context of Templar One. The metaplot is there, in the open, and it's basically saying that the
player characters are the least important pieces on the grand chess table that is EVE.
I do enjoy the metaplot, but I don't think I'm alone in saying that perhaps it's best that it not be general knowledge. There are ways to bring the revelations to light, but will it be acknowledged by CCP? That's probably a question that should be directly asked on the EVE forums, with an effort made to bring it to CCP's attention.
I don't play EVE to sit back and have plot spoon fed to me. I never have, and I never will. I am quite happy that I've influenced what I have in regards to the metaplot, overtly or covertly, but it is kind of a kick in the teeth when I see my concepts twisted into justifying badly written transhumanist agendas.