Let's remember that CSM was elected with what, 8, 95 of playerbase vote? Somenthing like that, so I wouldn't call them even closer to be community leaders despite whatever labels and titles they do have on that regard. It's fashionable, it's a great PR stund by CCP, it works to direct the media around but it's a farse. Although I admit I have a highly biased opinion about CSM because i hate it since its inception, so take my words with a grain of salt.
Just as in the real world if you don't vote then its quite easy to discount your opinion. (alternatively you can protest of course but I think thats not something on the evidence of this and other threads you appear to support either) - of course this particular CSM was a peculiar thing - there were a few candidates (trebor, seleene, meissa) elected by general support while most were alliance power bloc appointees and the impact of that was for people to consider them less representative because well - they were not really that representative of the general community. But as I said, if you don't vote then you can't really complain that much so the 85-90% silent majority doesn't get to complain when other opinion-makers are considered.
And yes, about community its a delicate term and I particularly dont like it when people generalize it. I see it tossed around very often around here, community this, community that without actually accounting for what they really are. It's a poor term that can be easily misplaced to use as propaganda for opinions that arent really reflecting the reality of a situation. It gives the impression of a much larger consensus about something that isnt really there.
Counts both ways though. In this recent explosion I think you were expressing a minority viewpoint in favour of Microtransactions in all their dodgy glory up to and including Perfect World International style game-breaking effects. Of course you can claim that the "silent majority" was behind your opinion but is that any more accurate or credible than those speaking of community outrage over the leaked memos, "greed is good" and $1000 pants scandal? I don't think so.
End of the day we will agree to differ here. You and Mizhara have a right to consider all the protesters and annoyed players in the scathing terms you have condemned them. Other people have a right to consider this stance reactionary at best.
I'm content that the majority of outrage expressed by the community (who cared to make a public statement) was reasonable and valid. There was cause for this scandal and the fact it was carried by a large array of gaming sites and commentators suggests others hold this opinion. The compromise offered now by CCP is "okay" in my eyes but I remain deeply distrustful of the NeX concept and I think it is gnawing away at the special something that makes Eve a game worth playing.
Sure there were extremists on the protester side, but there were extremists on the anti-protester side and the numbers of monocle-trolling threads got absolutely ridiculous. Some people just like forum drama on both sides. Those people *shrugs* thats the internet really. But more troubling to me going forwards from here is the apparent motivation of pro-NeX commentators...
Because what I perceive in the supporters of NeX is a desire to flaunt their rl wealth over other players in a way that brings no reward to conventional players of the game (via industry and manufacture) and I find it a distasteful assault on the foundations of the game a lot of us have played and enjoyed for a long time.
I am disappointed that the CSM did not come back with a commitment from CCP to deliver a certain percentage of Incarna content outside of the NeX store.
So despite my general happiness that CCP have answered the entirely valid concerns of the player-base over CQ performance/functionality issues. And despite my feeling that the PTW issue may abate on the vanity-only pledge:
I am left with lingering disquiet over the Nex/Vanity item concept as a whole and as other people in this thread have stated; if the only way to properly customize and personalize our characters in Incarna is going to be to reach for the credit card via NeX and bypass traditional industry/manufacture in the gameworld to do it, then I'm of the feeling that something of the soul of Eve has been lost and the minority in favour of vanity MT's ...
Crowd-sourced survey from EO assembly hallWill have managed to ruin something rather precious in their need to access their creditcards to showoff in a hitherto purist sandbox subscription universe.