you got a lot of fallacies in your arguments, too many to point them out especially as all of them have nothing to do with the debate on slavery here.
Point them out plz... Not just talk.... I havent falcfy any of my argument....and I have all of yours. So plz show some debate.... and use logic to explain..... not just some I said the definition of the word is bullshit.... I thought you have study it.... come on than.... falcify my fat american friend. And plz explain your axiom...You havent still done it (you have just define it).
You'd have to argue why
When you doing this..... not forget your on words..Mf.
This is surreal.
Yeah, I'm confused, too.
So, general question, in the interests of understanding:
Some people seem to have a deep-seated need for the Caldari to be greedy space nazis, while others seem to want them to be a Randian meritocratic paradise. In much similar vein, it seems to me this debate is about some people wanting the Amarr to be pig-eyed, whip-wielding slavers, while others want them to be basically okay people with a strange quirk in their moral system that they're otherwise very nice about, now there's a good slave, have a cup of tea.
Oh, and then there's some people way out in left field discussing empiricism, Popper, strict logic, and proof structure, as if we're debating philosophy of science, instead of imaginary space people.
Would that be an accurate caricature of the debate, at this point?
I would agree on that with Mithra. whould also add for the last pages that one of the magical three (Gotti, hellgremlin, Mithra); doesnt except that he could be wrong.... so I have to falcfy him again and again and again.... and to explain that he should act as he does:
* "Doing a Nicoletta Mithra post.... which just had "read Popper" and not the whole package, and has instate of falzify an argument post just some lines."
Thats why this topic is below IGS right now. This guy is just.... .no words....
About... Slavery. Im happy if someone else, not just me, answer Chell Charon. And plz dont answer with just elments of his post... and add some "I define it as motherfucker".... thats why you are doing it wrong.... plz logical deductiv (cannt stand this u doing wrong debate).
