Backstage - OOC Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Slaver-hounds aren't a type of dog? For more information see here.

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: EVE novels: thoughts?  (Read 3746 times)

Makoto Priano

  • Guest
EVE novels: thoughts?
« on: 07 Jun 2013, 11:37 »

Hey folks! After a lengthy period away, I've been getting back into EVE these past few months. It's been mostly fun and games, of course, but I let my curiosity get the best of me and snagged the three EVE novels while I catch up on PF. It took forever to force my way through Empyrean Age, and I'm now working on Burning Life.

The question: what are your folks' thoughts on these books?

In my case, well-- my god. Empyrean Age. From the Women In Refrigerators moment with PM Midular (SERIOUSLY? It was almost flippant!), to the three instances of Heroic, Sorrowful Single Tears, or the fact that a -novel- fails the Bechdel Test...?

Anyway. So far, I'm not far into Burning Life, but it seems to be a better read, if a touch focused on 'explaining the game' as a world.

Thoughts? Recommendations? Must-reads?
Logged

Shiori

  • Guest
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #1 on: 07 Jun 2013, 11:40 »

TBL is a bit bland, but works well if you approach it as an exposition tour of the EVE universe.

As for the two novels by Tony Gonzales, the short version of the advice is "No."

The long version, "NoooOooooOOooooo!"
Logged

Makoto Priano

  • Guest
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #2 on: 07 Jun 2013, 11:48 »

Yeah. God. Baron Karsoth Harkonnen, the Minmatar Failed State--er, Republic, the Gallente Totally-Paradise-And-Best-At-Everything (was Gonzalez a GalFed RPer, or...?), the Caldari-- well. How to describe that. Was he trying to model the Caldari State off 1900s Russia, with serfdom and a tsar?

Alright. Not venting. Really.
Logged

kalaratiri

  • Kalalalaakiota
  • The Mods
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2107
  • Shes mad but shes magic, theres no lie in her fire
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #3 on: 07 Jun 2013, 11:49 »

TBL is a bit bland, but works well if you approach it as an exposition tour of the EVE universe.

As for the two novels by Tony Gonzales, the short version of the advice is "No."

The long version, "NoooOooooOOooooo!"

http://nooooooooooooooo.com/
Logged


"Eve roleplayers scare me." - The Mittani

Aria Jenneth

  • Veteran
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1124
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #4 on: 07 Jun 2013, 13:23 »

I gather TBL is solid.

Otherwise? With due respect to CCP, I don't take anything from Tony G as canon without a secondary citation. The man literally could not keep straight which Caldari battleship was the new kid on the block-- a bit of canon that isn't exactly obscure (it's in the Raven and Scorpion item descs).

The melodrama that pervades his worldbuilding in an otherwise noir setting doesn't help my opinion one bit. The man was hired to write "Blade Runner," and came up with "Star Wars."

I know Hellgremlin thinks we're too hard on the guy, and I do sympathize with the plight of a writer faced with a deep, yet unfinished and changeable, canon, but the rest of the Eve PF has been pretty thematically consistent, making Tony G the outlier.
Logged

Mithfindel

  • (a.k.a. Axel Kurki)
  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #5 on: 07 Jun 2013, 13:39 »

A lot of what I don't like in TEA could have been fixed by subjecting the text to a person called an editor. Assumably the deadline (expansion going live) meant that CCP somehow managed to get MacMillan to act as a vanity press. However, some people do somehow like the novel. If you like Ruthless and Theodicy, you'll probably like The Empyrean Age.
Logged

Makkal

  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 837
  • Khanid victor
    • At the End of Your Journey
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #6 on: 07 Jun 2013, 13:53 »

It's a game novel.

It's crap.

A lot of what I don't like in TEA could have been fixed by subjecting the text to a person called an editor.
I know a first time novelist who wrote a 80k cozy mystery. No build up, saturated market, no one thought it would make any sort of splash. Her agent has her do a full edit twice before submitting it to publishers, and the Random House editor she ended up with asked for another six.

It was one of those mysteries where there are recipes scattered throughout the book and the editor even made the various dishes to make sure that they were 1) easy enough to make 2) actually decent.

I once chatted with the game writer who'd written a novel for that IP. He wrote the novel in about five months and had a single full edit on it. ONE.

And it was his first novel too!
« Last Edit: 07 Jun 2013, 14:03 by Makkal »
Logged
Ask not the sparrow how the eagle soars!

Current Events

kalaratiri

  • Kalalalaakiota
  • The Mods
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2107
  • Shes mad but shes magic, theres no lie in her fire
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #7 on: 07 Jun 2013, 14:02 »

The Burning Life is good, but more of a 'tour' of Eve than an actual deliberate story.
Logged


"Eve roleplayers scare me." - The Mittani

Svetlana Scarlet

  • Omelette
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 287
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #8 on: 07 Jun 2013, 14:03 »

It's a game novel.

It's crap.
Believe it or not, this does not necessarily have to be the case (though it is generally the rule). And accepting that all tie-in novels will be crap is part of what keeps the level of crap rather high.
Logged

Makkal

  • Pod Captain
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 837
  • Khanid victor
    • At the End of Your Journey
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #9 on: 07 Jun 2013, 14:07 »

Tie-in novels are books for people who don't read anything but tie-in novels.

The authors and publishers don't need to raise their bar because they already have an audience that's willing to pay because it's Halo, or EVE, or Star Wars, or DnD. That audience is what keeps the crap level high.
Logged
Ask not the sparrow how the eagle soars!

Current Events

Makoto Priano

  • Guest
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #10 on: 07 Jun 2013, 14:24 »

And this, I think, is why we need to hogtie and gag CCP's marketing division, so that they don't push pap for the sake of harvesting money. I swear...

(edit: and don't get me started about how they're using all the liveried ships for promotions, instead of giving us a way to build/acquire/fly liveried ships. ugh.)
« Last Edit: 07 Jun 2013, 14:27 by Makoto Priano »
Logged

Svetlana Scarlet

  • Omelette
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 287
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #11 on: 07 Jun 2013, 14:27 »

And this, I think, is why we need to hogtie and gag CCP's marketing division, so that they don't push pap for the sake of harvesting money. I swear...
Well, to be fair, when you go to FanFest and people say that TEA is the best book they've ever read, that doesn't really make them feel like they aren't serving their audience. This was not an uncommon occurrence in 2008-2009.
Logged

Makoto Priano

  • Guest
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #12 on: 07 Jun 2013, 14:30 »

Wait. Please tell me you aren't serious.

Please.

Dear god. These must be the troglodytes who don't actually bother reading, and so simply aren't literate enough to realize how filled with pap TEA is.
Logged

Svetlana Scarlet

  • Omelette
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 287
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #13 on: 07 Jun 2013, 14:32 »

Wait. Please tell me you aren't serious.

Please.

Dear god. These must be the troglodytes who don't actually bother reading, and so simply aren't literate enough to realize how filled with pap TEA is.
I am serious. I will refrain from making further judgements, but yes, I was rather surprised and saddened to hear such a thing.
Logged

Esna Pitoojee

  • Keeper of the Harem
  • Demigod
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2095
Re: EVE novels: thoughts?
« Reply #14 on: 07 Jun 2013, 17:27 »

I must respectfully reject the idea that all video game tie-in fiction must be terrible... although I do admit that most officially published tie-in fiction is terrible. Horrifyingly, I've actually read a great deal of well-written fan-fiction (most notably Tiberium Wars, whose writer takes ques from both RL military memoirs and Warhammer 40k). This has convinced me that while the fiction itself is not necessarily at fault, game companies have a strange ability to pick up the uniquely unqualified writers to do much of their work.

So, with that said and done:
TEA - No. Just no. The Empyrean Age is a book that should not have been written (and definitely not read). You can learn all the most important (and painful) points from the community; there is no need to subject yourself to the actual book.

The Burning Life - As people have said, it's more a giant infodump than a true novel. It's... okay, I guess? It's no genius, but you do learn a lot about the universe and aren't left with the urge to repeatedly impact the nearest wall with your head.

Templar One - It's... well, I won't say it's as bad as TEA. That isn't to say it doesn't have its wallbanger moments, but they come at a less dramatically staccato rate. Those that do come are pretty bad, though - without :spoilers:, I'll say that one which really bugged me was a returning character from TEA being selected for something he shouldn't have been, while millions (if not billions) of other more suitable candidates were out there. This has entirely predictable results.
Logged
I like the implications of Gallentians being punched in the face by walking up to a Minmatar as they so freely use another person's culture as a fad.
Pages: [1] 2