See, now this is a channel I'd enjoy (*likes writing speeches*) and has tremendous potential. Great work, Ben. :) Will you be using the MOTD to display scheduled speakers and events?
So... what about when the channel is "dead?"
Will there be standing topics of discussion relating to recent happenings (fx atm U'K's dissolution)?
Good luck, and I'll certainly join. Is rule #4 in effect when there isn't a specific speaker?
For the first question, I meant when an event was not happening. It seems you have updated the description or I read over it to clarify it.So... what about when the channel is "dead?"
Will there be standing topics of discussion relating to recent happenings (fx atm U'K's dissolution)?
I don't understand. I'll personally keep it updated if no one is on it for long periods of time, yes. Additionally, it's free for public use if there isn't any event happening.
You might think about doing something I recently start doing at, I think, Nola's? suggestion. I put up links to recent news items. You could also just have 1 at a time, if it relates to the current 'topic' being focused on.
Good initiative. I may offer to speak if it would be welcome.
Cos
is this a forever ban or is it temporary?New Eden Assembly
((Channel Name: New Eden Assembly))
- Sansha's Nation sympathizers are not permitted to enter the Assembly, at any time, due to hostile threats and the current conflicts that are ensuing.
is this a forever ban or is it temporary?New Eden Assembly
((Channel Name: New Eden Assembly))
- Sansha's Nation sympathizers are not permitted to enter the Assembly, at any time, due to hostile threats and the current conflicts that are ensuing.
How do you define who is a supporter of the Nation?
Characters that Shepherd has seen on other public forums (The Summit, IGS) that ICly speak proudly of Nation and support their efforts. Allowing them would create tensions and hostility with other characters who oppose Nation.
It's all dynamic, so if CCP decided that the Federation were to engage in a large-scale war with the State, extra care would be taken to keep the Assembly safe from the hostilities.
So, would an enthusiastically pro-reclaiming (Reclaiming-as-slavery) Amarr be banned?
Is it going to be a case-by-case kind of thing?
I'm struggling to see the basic difference between the Nation supporter who participates in the attacks, but can make a logical case (however flawed) for them, and the member of an Amarr RP corp who is a proponent of a violent reclaiming and acts as such (attacking people, etc) but can still conduct a discussion in a reasonable manner.
OFC, since the moderation is to be IC, it can just be 'the people who run the place think the Sanshas are evil'. That's perfectly legit.
I'm struggling to see the basic difference between the Nation supporter who participates in the attacks, but can make a logical case (however flawed) for them, and the member of an Amarr RP corp who is a proponent of a violent reclaiming and acts as such (attacking people, etc) but can still conduct a discussion in a reasonable manner.
OFC, since the moderation is to be IC, it can just be 'the people who run the place think the Sanshas are evil'. That's perfectly legit.
Yet another reason I cannot understand why you are in RK instead of doing something with your time that reflects you as a person and character.
ETA: Can people have claws/bazookas for hands and poison everyone to death with vaporware?
What constitutes a debate, for purposes of Title II, Article 3F?