Backstage - OOC Forums

General Discussion => Moderation Discussion => Topic started by: Laerise [PIE] on 15 May 2011, 00:31

Title: Dust 514
Post by: Laerise [PIE] on 15 May 2011, 00:31
http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=2233.msg29558#new


Err, where's the problem with that bit?  :ugh:  I think everyone of us dislikes PF contradictions - at least when they result out of omniscient narrations contradicting each other.

Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: Esna Pitoojee on 15 May 2011, 00:50
Absolute lack of any moderator commentary = accidental modding? *shrugs.* I don't honestly see any reason it should have been modded...
Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: Mizhara on 15 May 2011, 03:06
Wanted to ask that question myself.
Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: lallara zhuul on 15 May 2011, 04:07
Unconstructive?

Irrelevant to the thread?

Who knows?
Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: Saede Riordan on 15 May 2011, 07:43
If it was Louella who did the modding I suspect I know the reason >_>
Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: Laerise [PIE] on 15 May 2011, 08:21
If it was Louella who did the modding I suspect I know the reason >_>

And that's the problem, really, we don't know who moderates what. :|
Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: Louella Dougans on 15 May 2011, 13:43
1. an opposing view is presented, using a reference from published stuff.

2. instead of saying "oh, well maybe some do and some don't", the opposing view is dismissed with a statement about PF contradictions, thereby suggesting anyone holding the opposing view is "doing it wrong". This is underlined by use of the eyeroll smiley. Snarky and unconstructive.

3. as per the FAQ, "doing it wrong" statements are a no-no.
Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: Saede Riordan on 15 May 2011, 13:48
I'm fairly certain that you and I both know that was never the intent of that text...honestly Lou, I feel like you're going out of your way to find issues with my posts, and its rather irritating.
Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: Laerise [PIE] on 15 May 2011, 14:16
1. an opposing view is presented, using a reference from published stuff.

2. instead of saying "oh, well maybe some do and some don't", the opposing view is dismissed with a statement about PF contradictions, thereby suggesting anyone holding the opposing view is "doing it wrong". This is underlined by use of the eyeroll smiley. Snarky and unconstructive.

3. as per the FAQ, "doing it wrong" statements are a no-no.

If you want to interpret the rule that way I will report your post which Nikita quoted - the use of the vOv emoticon is offensive, snarky and unconstructive as well.

If you want to run a tight ship you should better not have a two-class society.
Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: Mizhara on 15 May 2011, 21:45
Targeted moderation, bias, 'looking for an excuse', poor justification and extremely broad interpretation of rulesets.

Never did see Louella being moderator material. Guess this proves it.

For the reasons others are mentioning here, and in my own post right here, I'm officially asking the Backstage administration to review Louella's position as a moderator, as I feel it's not conducive to a positive environment or the high standards of moderation Backstage needs.
Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: Morwen Lagann on 15 May 2011, 22:03
The moderation team is aware of this thread and the issue(s) raised, and we are looking into it as we speak. The likelihood of the thread becoming unconstructive past this point is rather high, so we will be locking this thread.

If you feel the need to raise an issue that has not already been addressed, please send a PM to one or more of the moderators.
Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: Casiella on 16 May 2011, 18:29
Upon further review, we have restored Nikita's post to the original thread as it does not violate any of the rules here at Backstage.

I'd like to note that the entire staff (along with everyone else) sees all moderation actions and, like any group of people, our opinions may vary internally. This is good and healthy and part of the reason why Silver doesn't run this place entirely solo. (Also because he has a life!) But it also presents challenges, partly because of the global nature of the site which results in posts at all hours, and partly because cultural expectations and understandings differ.

We do have some internal guidelines. Generally speaking, moderators try not to take action in threads in which we post as individuals. Occasionally, particularly egregious posts may require immediate action, or sometimes we just forget (or no one else is available). This applies even more so in the case of replies to a moderator's individual post, where except in extreme circumstances the moderator should let one of the other staff members handle the situation.

As a side note, when a member reports a moderator's post, that moderator may choose to respond in the private discussion thread created by the report, but other moderators decide what action to take.

The entire Backstage staff and I are very sorry that this happened, and while I won't comment on specifics, obviously we're listening to everyone (privately and publicly) and working things out. All people make mistakes sometimes and deserve respect and a chance to explain themselves.

I'm re-opening the thread because I believe that, at this point everyone here can discuss things civilly and courteously. Please don't disabuse me of the notion -- clearly, we'd rather not wield the Mallet of Loving Correction here.
Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: Ken on 16 May 2011, 18:53
we have restored Nikita's post to the original thread

The entire Backstage staff and I are very sorry that this happened

Well, that's good.
Title: Re: Dust 514
Post by: Saede Riordan on 16 May 2011, 19:34
nicely done I believe some golfclap would be appropriate *golfclaps*