Backstage - OOC Forums

EVE-Online RP Discussion and Resources => EVE OOC Summit => Topic started by: orange on 16 Feb 2013, 11:54

Title: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 16 Feb 2013, 11:54
Ishukone expresses anger at Caldari Provincial Directorate as Ground Fighting Erupts on Intaki Homeworld (http://community.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=5037&tid=6)

Am I the only one that is having trouble figuring out what State forces are fighting Federation forces on Intaki?  Is it DUST corps going at it (with a lack of names to go into the article)?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Samira Kernher on 16 Feb 2013, 12:00
I believe one of our DUSTies did mention something to that affect in the Summit yesterday, following the rock concert thing.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Karmilla Strife on 16 Feb 2013, 13:59
It's probably DUST forces, just like the raid on the Starkmanir colony by Bragian order.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Matoko on 16 Feb 2013, 14:57
Huh... Hey I-RED, you guys don't happen to accept Gallente Intaki, do you?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Korsavius on 16 Feb 2013, 16:24
I-RED accepts anyone, I believe, so long as they contribute and abide by and respect State policies, laws, etc etc.

On topic, I r teh madzzz! D:<

How dare Heth allow for this! The peaceful Intaki people did not ask for this nor deserve it.

/me amplifies his anti-Heth/CPD actions...secretly >_>
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 16 Feb 2013, 22:58
Of note, I think so long as the story arc is about Heth trampling on megas & fighting long-time allies (Mordu's) the arc is on railroad tracks.   When the choice was between Heth & criminals, Guristas, and Angels, it actually created in-space conflict.

Since there has been zero effort to actually provide clear (fictitious) motivations for Heth's overreach or a long-term build up of Heth & the CPD being good for the State, there is a clear lack of conflict.   It is remarkably easy to sit on one's hands and let him fall.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Pieter Tuulinen on 16 Feb 2013, 23:13
Yeah. Even Loyalists like myself and the rest of Pyre have gone 'Lolwhut?' since they are doing just about everything short of having Heth consume infants on live television.

There is, literally, only the very slimmest of grey areas remaining to  CPD loyalists before the only reason to remain loyal will be the Koolaid.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Sakura Nihil on 16 Feb 2013, 23:48
Intaki is like the Berlin of our game.

Discuss. :psyccp:



PS: I'm super-tired, don't take this question seriously.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Matoko on 17 Feb 2013, 00:00
"Executor Heth, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Caldari State and it's regions, if you seek liberalization, come here to this gate. Mr. Heth, open this gate. Mr. Heth, Mr. Heth, tear down this wall!"
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Gesakaarin on 17 Feb 2013, 00:06
Thing is, most of the events that serve as prologue surrounding this current arc are mostly outlined in Templar One which our characters do not know about.

From my own character's perspective it looks like Heth is just digging a deeper and deeper hole for Kaalakiota with his use of the CPD/Provists/Templis to go around and give more and more reasons why every other Mega should now go and seek his removal. He really is conforming to the allegations of being a power-mad dictator with no checks on his authority at present through recent actions.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Katrina Oniseki on 17 Feb 2013, 00:17
People have been calling Heth's introduction to EVE the word thing to ever happen to Caldari RP. Now that he's being removed by Falcon, people are complaining? Seriously?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Pieter Tuulinen on 17 Feb 2013, 00:21
I quite liked the dynamic he represented in Caldari RP. A return to the old ways, in some senses,  big of homespun Civire common sense in a world run by eight faced, four hearted Deteis.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Gesakaarin on 17 Feb 2013, 00:26
People have been calling Heth's introduction to EVE the word thing to ever happen to Caldari RP. Now that he's being removed by Falcon, people are complaining? Seriously?

Not so much a complaint as much as pointing out that given how events are playing out there's no real need to do much now except just watch as Heth drinks the hemlock because he's so good at making enemies and alienating almost everyone in the State.

And yes, my own characters are more than glad to see Heth fall because now that means the, "Experiment" of the New Meritocracy has obviously failed and requires a return to the Old Order - perhaps with minor adjustments to ensure these bouts of populism don't happen again.

*coughs*
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Alizabeth on 17 Feb 2013, 02:42
You know why Game of Thrones is such a good book?  Because the badguys win.  Heth is a horrible person but he's not a bad character.  (Poorly written in some cases.)  Conflict is needed for any good story.  Heth has been good for Caldari RP, overall.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Gesakaarin on 17 Feb 2013, 04:41
I don't think some of the Megacorp CEO/Directors or those old and powerful families in the State could be considered, "Good guys" by any stretch of the imagination, either.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Lyn Farel on 17 Feb 2013, 06:44
I do not find the Heth character in itself especially bad. The syndic corporate worker archetype around is not necessarily a bad thing imho.

Where lies the real issue is most likely that he has completely twisted what the Caldari society was about, by suddenly becoming some kind of fascist dictator ruling over the 8 megas with popular support. It changed a lot of the Caldari face overall.

Thing is, most of the events that serve as prologue surrounding this current arc are mostly outlined in Templar One which our characters do not know about.

Can we haz a tl;dr about the TO events that our characters do not know about ?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: ArtOfLight on 17 Feb 2013, 07:43
*Malcolm sits down for his afternoon cup of Hak'len and reads the latest news on his datapad. Upon reaching this particular article, Hak'len spews forth from his lips and bathes his datapad. Through the gently flowing stream of Hak'len now moving southward over the screen, Malcolm's eyes narrow at the words and his lips twist downward into a grimace of disgust.

At last, he sets the soon-to-be ruined datapad on the smooth, glass table before him and leans back in his chair gazing into the distance. As was his way of doing things, he ponders the situation and the courses before him - consequences are only briefly considered as they tend to sway one's opinion toward the "safer" course rather than the "right" one.


--=={X}==--

Approaching his capsule to leave the station, Malcolm prepares himself to once again be "jacked in." When the capsule embeds itself into the customized hull of his Hawk-class Assault Frigate, Malcolm adjusts the automated systems and negates the safety-protocols, permitting free action. As the ship leaves the docking bay of the station and the strange solace of the stars floods his senses one more, Malcolm steels himself for the days ahead.*
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vikarion on 17 Feb 2013, 08:12
People have been calling Heth's introduction to EVE the word thing to ever happen to Caldari RP. Now that he's being removed by Falcon, people are complaining? Seriously?

I'm not complaining about the removal of Heth, I just doubt that that's what CCP will really do. At the most, I figure they'll remove him just to replace him with something even worse, rather than the cyber-punkish, megacorporate state we used to have.

When CCP Falcon said that they realized that the factions have been portrayed unfairly, a lot of people took that to mean that a more balanced grey-and-grey view would be adopted. I, on the other hand, tend to be more pessimistic. I think that CCP could very well mean that the Amarr Empire and Caldari State have been portrayed too well, and thus that it's time to really put some hurt to them. I won't be surprised if we end up with the Caldari Navy bombarding civilian populations in the State and Heth setting up death-camps for Achurans, for example.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: BloodBird on 17 Feb 2013, 08:33
You know why Game of Thrones is such a good book?  Because the badguys win.  Heth is a horrible person but he's not a bad character.  (Poorly written in some cases.)  Conflict is needed for any good story.  Heth has been good for Caldari RP, overall.

No, wrong. Heth has been TERRIBLE for Caldari RP.

First off, 'Caldari RP' is the players who engage in it. When the whole thing with Heth started plenty of State RP'ers up and left, either quit RP'ing, changed their RP aims or quit the game. That was directly bad.

Secondly Heth introduced a very un-Caldari concept to Caldari RP that went right in the face of what PF had established as 'Caldari like' for so long. Back when we had no Emperor, Prime Minister Midular and President Fouritain, the State enjoyed a unique edge by being directly led by a council of CEO's for the corporations. It helped reinforce the idea that the State was not really that much of a "State" but more a confederation of 8 massive corporations and the 8 CEO's who ran them were directly in charge, with a few collective entities under their control that they all assist with, like the Navy. The Republican Prime Minister had her council of Tribal leaders and representatives, the Federation's President had the Senate and back before Doriam was offed there was the Council of Heirs that directly ruled in the Emperor's name. The Caldari were the only ones not to have a single figurehead to look to BACKED by a council type organ, the Council type organ WAS DIRECTLY IN CHARGE.

In short, Heth simplified the State in a major, and very un-Caldari way. And he did not even do a good job at it - his involvement turned a morally-grey faction with debt and nuances into a single-minded corporate dictatorship that got their simple, blacker shades from super-racism, starting a war out of hatred and generally just converting that State into this would-be arc-typical "bad guy" faction. It capitalized on amplifying all the negative traits the State possessed to make them 'darker' and more 'bad'.

And EVE is not about Good VS Bad. (Federation/Republic VS State/Empire) It's about Grey and Grey vs Grey and Grey, all with slightly different shades and plenty of vibrant back-story, and this is what people like Tony G seemed never to understand.

Honestly, if Heth is removed and some of that "Caldari like" essence is restored to the State I'll be very happy, very happy.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vikarion on 17 Feb 2013, 08:39
I...agree with BB?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: BloodBird on 17 Feb 2013, 08:48
I...agree with BB?

Don't worry, it's not a lethal condition and it wanes soon enough.  :P
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Lyn Farel on 17 Feb 2013, 10:04
I think it could be wiser to actually move Heth to where he should have been put in the first place : a public, cultural icon of the Caldari, a chief syndic being a thorn in the feet of the nepotistic CEP. A bit like Blaque (sociocrats) in the side of Foiritain. Not necessarily someone with a lot of executive power actually.

It would ask for a lot of plot gymnastics though.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Gesakaarin on 17 Feb 2013, 10:05
To be honest, I think without Heth as the Executor there could be a very interesting dynamic in the State of having the "traditionalist" corporatists who believe in things like corporate sovereignty, balance of power through the CBT/CEP, market independence contrasted with the "nationalist" Provist/Templis who continue to agitate for a unified State above the Megacorps, militarism and the settling of old scores.

With both views arguing that theirs is the fundamental and true vision of the Caldari State which in a sense makes sense since it wouldn't have existed if the seceding Megas couldn't foment popular support through Caldari nationalism, and the Caldari colonial patriots and nationalists would not have been able to realize their ambitions of independence without the finance and support of the Megas. A Devil's pact perhaps, but one that I think would still affect the modern State and would be interesting to explore.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 17 Feb 2013, 10:21
People have been calling Heth's introduction to EVE the word thing to ever happen to Caldari RP. Now that he's being removed by Falcon, people are complaining? Seriously?

The Broker was the worst thing to happen to Caldari RP.  Heth's intro was a Broker ploy.  Heth should have been a mixed bag, but we have little to no insight how wide spread the reforms have been and if those reforms are directly tired to CPD penetration.  All we get is a paranoid baseliner, used to introduce Factional Warfare (where he was unneeded) and now the introduction of DUSTies (where he is unneeded).
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Akrasjel Lanate on 20 Feb 2013, 05:57
http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=caldari-navy-stands-down-remains-secretive

Caldari war mashine standing down, jobs done ?
Approved by "EVERY megacorpation", that would mean Ishukone too ?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Anslol on 20 Feb 2013, 07:28
http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=caldari-navy-stands-down-remains-secretive

Caldari war mashine standing down, jobs done ?
Approved by "EVERY megacorpation", that would mean Ishukone too ?

LAME
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Desiderya on 20 Feb 2013, 08:00
That would mean this, yes.

Also I'm positively surprised by this article. It refers to what actually happened (including IGS discussions by player characters) and addresses the concerns voiced while providing an interesting feedback. Overall this reads far more ambiguous than recent events, which were rather black and white.

Now we see baseline support and high-level scepticism - one can interpret the silence as criticism or reluctance, too - regarding the CPDs internal policing, basically mirroring what has been said on these forums in related discussions and was deemed lacking in earlier news posts/events.
I'm definitely going to stay tuned. ;)
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Jev North on 20 Feb 2013, 08:17
The Broker was the worst thing to happen to Caldari RP.  Heth's intro was a Broker ploy.  Heth should have been a mixed bag, but we have little to no insight how wide spread the reforms have been and if those reforms are directly tired to CPD penetration.  All we get is a paranoid baseliner, used to introduce Factional Warfare (where he was unneeded) and now the introduction of DUSTies (where he is unneeded).
Pretty much! It's the prime example of why reading the TonyG novels is bad for your health; every time Heth comes up you need to plug up your ears, tightly close your eyes, and go "LA LA LA LA LA" real loudly to help yourself ignore all of the stuff you're not supposed to know, but too terrible to ignore easily. It's a strain.

I'm definitely going to stay tuned. ;)
Ditto!
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Desiderya on 20 Feb 2013, 08:57
The broker is TonyG's beloved deus ex machina. That's bad enough, but what really makes it horrible is that it is entirely unnecessary. Doing it twice in the same book (Terran superweapon - thrice if you want to count the elder fleet which at least seems to contain the least asspullium) just adds insult to injury.

On the caldari side the biggest impact is that - ICly - Heth looks like a war hero and (at least not in-) competent leader whereas OOCly you just know that he got there by sheer luck and massive outside influence. Totally caldari values <.<.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Anslol on 20 Feb 2013, 12:26
Alright, I'm going to say it here and now. I fully support using the Broker. Sorry, but I do. Eve's story line so far is fun, but the ancient history and mysterious stuff is what gets me REALLY interested (Sleeper itams, Jovian interferan', the Other doin' bad stuffan',  Broker dyan').

But no seriously, I don't see why the concept is so hated. It brings out more mystery and cool stuff in Eve. I don't play this game to see the same human problems persist 20,000 years from now half way across the verse without ANY kind of extra mystery lurking about and poking its head out. If the Broker is that plot device so be it. I don't think it's totally beyond the bounds to classify it as believable. It's a big verse after all.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Lyn Farel on 20 Feb 2013, 13:27
I think we would have had less issues with these deus ex machinas if they were introduced in more subtle and realistic settings like the illuminati in Deus Ex or whatever.

The broker works well in Mass Effect, which is a space op saga with villains, heroes, and epicness ala StarWars.

It works less well in complicated grim and grey, more realistic settings like Eve. It does not fit very well and leaves a feeling of awkwardness, like if you were introducing Palpatine on the Amarr throne. OMG the broker is behind it all.

Edit ; add to that the broker is not a very deep and original creation and well... It does not make the concept attractive imo.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Desiderya on 20 Feb 2013, 16:59
I do think the ancient races and that material has a lot of potential. Although I question whether Jamyl being kind of possessed was necessary in a pure Sci-Fi (as opposed to, say, shadowrun) setting.

On the topic of the broker: It's not mystery, because no one save one living NPC knows of his existance and involvement. He wanted Insorum and instead of sneaking into Otro's sekrit facilities with his omnipotent deus ex machina magic it's somewhat easier to toss two empires into a war to ask Otro nicely if he wants to give it to him on the brink of (Malkalen) desaster. After this has obviously failed I don't really see additional motivation to sabotage tripwire for Heth. But vOv.

It's not the sekrit (capsuleer) Illuminati pulling strings, it's some random dude that somehow makes it so that other things can happen in the universe and then disappears again.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 20 Feb 2013, 17:34
You know why Game of Thrones is such a good book?  Because the badguys win.  Heth is a horrible person but he's not a bad character.  (Poorly written in some cases.)  Conflict is needed for any good story.  Heth has been good for Caldari RP, overall.

No, wrong. Heth has been TERRIBLE for Caldari RP.

First off, 'Caldari RP' is the players who engage in it. When the whole thing with Heth started plenty of State RP'ers up and left, either quit RP'ing, changed their RP aims or quit the game. That was directly bad.

Secondly Heth introduced a very un-Caldari concept to Caldari RP that went right in the face of what PF had established as 'Caldari like' for so long. Back when we had no Emperor, Prime Minister Midular and President Fouritain, the State enjoyed a unique edge by being directly led by a council of CEO's for the corporations. It helped reinforce the idea that the State was not really that much of a "State" but more a confederation of 8 massive corporations and the 8 CEO's who ran them were directly in charge, with a few collective entities under their control that they all assist with, like the Navy. The Republican Prime Minister had her council of Tribal leaders and representatives, the Federation's President had the Senate and back before Doriam was offed there was the Council of Heirs that directly ruled in the Emperor's name. The Caldari were the only ones not to have a single figurehead to look to BACKED by a council type organ, the Council type organ WAS DIRECTLY IN CHARGE.

In short, Heth simplified the State in a major, and very un-Caldari way. And he did not even do a good job at it - his involvement turned a morally-grey faction with debt and nuances into a single-minded corporate dictatorship that got their simple, blacker shades from super-racism, starting a war out of hatred and generally just converting that State into this would-be arc-typical "bad guy" faction. It capitalized on amplifying all the negative traits the State possessed to make them 'darker' and more 'bad'.

And EVE is not about Good VS Bad. (Federation/Republic VS State/Empire) It's about Grey and Grey vs Grey and Grey, all with slightly different shades and plenty of vibrant back-story, and this is what people like Tony G seemed never to understand.

Honestly, if Heth is removed and some of that "Caldari like" essence is restored to the State I'll be very happy, very happy.

The worst part about Heth is that his introduction made no sense whatsoever and made everyone in KK corporate management look like fucking idiots. I have already ranted about this enough, but if Heth had been a corporate financier who seized control of KK through a hostile takeover or whatever, it would have been far less objectionable to me. That fact that TEA made the Caldari megacorps look like cut-rate Captain Planet villains with factories that were seemed to be incompetently built and run and whose sole product appeared to be human misery is what made Heth most objectionable to me.

Even if that had happened, though, Heth's introduction still turns a dynamic and internally conflicted government into a fascist monolith, which is extremely uninteresting to me as a Caldari RPer. Part of the reason I was attracted to the Caldari in the first place is because the Caldari government reminded me so much of the Corporate Court and the megacorporations in Shadowrun. Instead, after TEA, you had everyone evidently just giving Heth control of the State because...well, I'm still not sure why the hell they did, considering he has no acknowledged experience at anything other than working a factory line, when up until then the entire purpose of the weak Caldari government was to ensure the that no megacorporation could get one up on the others.

So if he gets torn down and the status quo is restored (seeing Oiritsuu punch his ticket would be quite nice for me, as someone who has gotten very tired of the way powerful female characters have been handled in the CCP fiction historically), and the megas go back to not trusting each other only slightly less than they trust non-Caldari I will be quite happy.

And the Caldari megacorporations have never been "good guys." The liberals might get a reputation for being slightly less "bad," but they still play the same games as the rest, just like Ares might be seen as the "good guys" in Shadowrun. They'll still fuck their competitors over for an extra ISK. On the other hand, the Caldari did used to have ideals that I was happy to promote and a reason for me (as Svetlana) to extol the virtues of the Caldari system, which promptly flew out the window when shit happened that made no fucking sense.

I have always said that all four empires are supposed to be examples of utopic societies that fell short -- Caldari are the meritocratic, libertarian, technocratic, free market utopia that became a paranoid, corporatist state controlled by the uppermost members of society. The "ideal" of what the Caldari State was supposed to be is what motivated a lot of Caldari RPers, I think, and when it became clear that CCP felt like that wasn't what the Caldari were at least pretending to aspire to, when they became fascist, hatemongering idiots who are just slavering for a change to rip the Gallente apart, I lost interest. I don't want to play a cardboard cutout.

Also, 15% of the Caldari State is soldiers now? Don't get me started on why that shit makes no sense and makes me angry. :P
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Desiderya on 20 Feb 2013, 19:23
There's that word again. Libertarian?
I cannot align this word with the mere description "Corporate Dictatorship" given on the caldari - and this was prior to Heth.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 20 Feb 2013, 19:48
There's that word again. Libertarian?
I cannot align this word with the mere description "Corporate Dictatorship" given on the caldari - and this was prior to Heth.

In theory (ie in a utopia), you can have corporate dictatorships in a libertarian society since association with a particular corporation/company/organization/etc is voluntary action for all parties involved.  The challenge is that in an advanced, information age society (like our own) or in a Sci-Fi space setting, it can be extremely challenging to not become beholden to one corporation or another.   We may choose our corporate fiefdoms, but if we do not enter into the contract we simply will not have access to the service they provide.   The barriers to the little guy to say "fuck you, I don't need you!  I am going to leave and go settle somewhere you don't have control and live there!" are much higher.

In our modern age, the discussion might be between choosing whether to go with an Apple-controlled tech ecosystem or a Google-controlled tech ecosystem.  These competitors do not necessarily need to produce compatible services.  You can apply this to a myriad of industries.

A Sci-Fi setting, like Shadowrun and Eve (Federation-State bloc) allows us to explore various aspects this taken to extremes.  I seem to recall a conversation (I think IC) in which a member of Star Fraction (I think it was Jade) agreed that of the ideals, the State's system was the closest to what they would pursue, but fell horribly short.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 20 Feb 2013, 20:01
There's that word again. Libertarian?
I cannot align this word with the mere description "Corporate Dictatorship" given on the caldari - and this was prior to Heth.

Dex sums it up quite nicely. At least in theory, the State government is extremely hands off when it comes to the individual citizen. In practice, the corporations have almost complete control because in order to do anything you have to play by their rules because they own everything. But the State government doesn't make it illegal for you to say whatever you want, or build up your own private army, or print your own currency...it's just that in practice, the only people who can really do that are the upper levels of the corporate oligarchy, not because it's against the law, but because only the people who run the corporations have the financial wherewithall to do so. The State outlaws slavery because it takes away your rights...but signing your rights away in a contract is perfectly valid. It was your free will, after all...nevermind the fact that you probably would starve to death in many cases if you didn't.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Pieter Tuulinen on 20 Feb 2013, 21:15
You're forgetting the power of societal collectivism of thought. There is nothing in the rules prohibiting a worker from adopting the Amarr religion and yet it would be social suicide to do so.

Such a worker, whether a Janitor or an Executive, would find themselves socially ostracised and forced from their position in society. The Executive's extra money wouldn't help them, because they would be targetted and brought down by a consortium of their peers and immediate subordinates.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Lyn Farel on 21 Feb 2013, 04:45
There is a huge dichotomy towards the libertarian aspect of the Caldari. Your points make it very valid, but also when one considers that libertarianism is also the systematic denial of any involvement of the state and the law in individual lifes... It fits well for the megas, but less for their citizens.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Desiderya on 21 Feb 2013, 08:24
The State has the potential of going all big brother on their citizens ( or rather, the megacorporations have this for their employees ). It's influencing its citizens heavily and there are mechanisms of control that aren't very libertarian. You get paid in corporate scrip, you are very likely encouraged to stay brand loyal and not just live in [megacorp] living quarters but also buy products by the corporation in question.
Switching megacorporate affiliation isn't as easy as you make it sound. Loyality to the employer is encouraged, demanded and extremely common. So going against this is naturally raising red flags. The recent "demographics" article has kind of confirmed this.

To me it looks like the State has all the tools necessary to excert massive control but it doesn't need to use them in most occasions due to the way the caldari people are ticking. After all, the system wasn't forced onto them but more or less chosen and adopted to their needs and preferences. You might want to phrase it as "benevolent dictatorship".
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 21 Feb 2013, 09:34
There is a huge dichotomy towards the libertarian aspect of the Caldari. Your points make it very valid, but also when one considers that libertarianism is also the systematic denial of any involvement of the state and the law in individual lifes... It fits well for the megas, but less for their citizens.

When a denizen of the State is without a corporation, whose laws (or more appropriately rules & regulations) do they fall under?

I don't think the dichotomy is there, but perceived to be there.  When you sign-up to work for a corporation, you put yourself (and your family) in the very rigid environment.

The Caldari State remember is nothing more than the banding together of a group of rebelling megacorporations with a common cultural heritage against an overbearing "foreign" government.

The State has the potential of going all big brother on their citizens ( or rather, the megacorporations have this for their employees ). It's influencing its citizens heavily and there are mechanisms of control that aren't very libertarian. You get paid in corporate scrip, you are very likely encouraged to stay brand loyal and not just live in [megacorp] living quarters but also buy products by the corporation in question.
Switching megacorporate affiliation isn't as easy as you make it sound. Loyality to the employer is encouraged, demanded and extremely common. So going against this is naturally raising red flags. The recent "demographics" article has kind of confirmed this.

I don't think we tried to make it sound easy to move between megacorporations.

Quote from: author=Desiderya link=topic=4155.msg66436#msg66436 date=1361456699
To me it looks like the State has all the tools necessary to exert massive control but it doesn't need to use them in most occasions due to the way the caldari people are ticking. After all, the system wasn't forced onto them but more or less chosen and adopted to their needs and preferences. You might want to phrase it as "benevolent dictatorship".

I would counter that the megacorporations already exert massive control and the people don't notice.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Lyn Farel on 21 Feb 2013, 10:24
A libertarian wouldnt put himself in such an environnement to my eyes. But I may be very foreign to the concept of libertarianism...
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 21 Feb 2013, 10:34
Really? I think the Caldari State is pretty much a taken-to-the-extreme example of what happens if you get rid of almost all government regulation. No one is forced to work for a corporation, you have every right not to sign that employment contract. The fact that you will have a very hard time of it if you don't isn't the government's problem, it's yours.

In practice, the Caldari State is definitely not a libertarian utopia, but there's a reason that "utopia" means "no place."
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Desiderya on 21 Feb 2013, 11:29
@Orange
These two points are exactly why libertarianism doesn't seem to fit in my interpretation. It can be argued that the 'state' (as in the concept of a state) doesn't have much of an impact on the megacorporations - but in the end, the megacorporations kind of are the state, and they do have a lot of impact.
It goes that far that I assume not being a subsidiary of the megacorporations puts you in a pretty tough place when you're attempting to start your own business.

Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 21 Feb 2013, 21:00
That is the point.

It illustrates a danger of a libertarian system; a potential end-result is a situation like the State, where powerful corporate entities control almost everything.  The lack of a government independent from the employers means the employees can be put in a difficult position with very little real mobility except for a small segment of society.

Quote from: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Caldari_State#Disassociated
The second group includes those who've found themselves moving between two or three different corporations and who have in the process come to consider how thoroughly indoctrinated the average employee is. These individuals end up doing very well in non-standard careers or in unlikely places within the corporate structure, united solely by their lack of adherence to the standard caste ladder.

Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Desiderya on 22 Feb 2013, 09:25
I would agree, but the State did not gravitate towards a corporate controlled system, the modern State was founded based on it.
You make it sound as if the society was intending a libertarian system that grimdarked itself into the current situation over time.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 22 Feb 2013, 09:37
The State is still "libertarian". There are few if any laws made by the State government that restrict individuals in any way, shape or form, at least prior to Heth and that ridiculousness. Of course, corporations owned almost all that territory already, but it was only fair, they were the ones that colonized it in the first place...and you wouldn't deny a man his right to private property, would you?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Lyn Farel on 22 Feb 2013, 10:04
The State is still "libertarian". There are few if any laws made by the State government that restrict individuals in any way, shape or form, at least prior to Heth and that ridiculousness. Of course, corporations owned almost all that territory already, but it was only fair, they were the ones that colonized it in the first place...and you wouldn't deny a man his right to private property, would you?

The megas are the state. I do not see much difference if laws come from here or a governement.

Really? I think the Caldari State is pretty much a taken-to-the-extreme example of what happens if you get rid of almost all government regulation. No one is forced to work for a corporation, you have every right not to sign that employment contract. The fact that you will have a very hard time of it if you don't isn't the government's problem, it's yours.

In practice, the Caldari State is definitely not a libertarian utopia, but there's a reason that "utopia" means "no place."

No one is either forced to live in the country they live in, with all its laws...
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: K_Wiroshoda on 22 Feb 2013, 17:06
I must admit I am very confused to see Caldari and libertarianism in the
same sentence. I would not misconstrue confederalism with libertarianism.
As far as the PF reads, each megacorporation appears to function as a
government/state unto itself, and all seem to be very statist. Even the PF
which goes back before Tibus Heth (I am assuming the following is) alludes
to this. The whole concept of libertarianism in EVE would to apply to the
Gallente instead, who have several direct references to the concept. Never
mind the fact the word "liberty" is key to the Gallente's ideology
according to the PF.

Quote from: Wikipedia
Libertarianism is a set of related political philosophies
which emphasize individual liberty, political freedom, and voluntary
association.

This is the complete opposite of what we know of the Caldari.

Quote from: Deteis Bloodline description
Driven by the cultural premise that the
good of the whole must come before the needs of the individual

Quote from: Power Politics chronicle
He knows that even if Gallente society can
be called a capitalistic one, the capitalism followed by the Gallenteans is
fundamentally different than the one found in the Caldari State. For
Gallenteans, the accumulation of wealth is something that is done on an
individual level and personal wealth only matters in comparison to the
wealth of other individuals. For the Caldari the economic wheels of the
state are controlled by huge corporations and for corporations competition,
efficiency and market share is more important than accumulation of wealth
(although the latter is often a happy by-product of the former) - business
for the good of the individual rather than the good of the many is
something totally alien to the Caldari.

Quote from: Caldari in-game description
Duty and discipline are required traits
in Caldari citizens, plus unquestioning loyalty to the corporation they
live to serve.

Quote from: http://community.eveonline.com/races/caldari.asp
As long as you keep
in line, do your job, uphold the laws and so forth, life can be fairly
pleasant and productive. But for those who are not cut out for this strict,
disciplined regime life quickly becomes intolerable. They lose their
respect, family, status, everything, and the only options left to them are
suicide or exile

The third point directly undermines the political freedom aspect of
libertarianism, what with 'unquestioning loyalty'. The last point directly
undermines the 'voluntary association' element of libertarianism. According
to libertarianism, the ability to refuse participation should not come with
the consequence of losing everything. Participation in the State is
compulsory if you desire to live your life.

The word libertarianism is used to directly describe the Gallente
Federation. I do not recall it ever being used to describe the Caldari.

Quote from: http://community.eveonline.com/races/gallenteGov_intro.asp
Anygovernmental
interference to keep things in check through legislation and
policing is naturally perceived as oppression of the rights and freedom of
individuals, constantly creating tension.

Quote from: Gallente Immigrants Ancestry description
the libertarian
culture

The Gallente dislike their government and appear to not want anything to do
with it. This is in direct contrast to the Caldari, who put themselves
behind their government/megacorporation. Repeatedly in PF, we see the
Gallente described as individualists and the Caldari as collectivists.
Libertarians are staunch critics of collectivism.

I'm also confused as to where the Caldari belief in the right to private
property comes from, not only considering they are collectivists, but also
when considering the following;

Quote from: http://community.eveonline.com/races/caldari.asp
All land and real
estate is owned by a company which leases it to the citizens

The question of "you wouldn't deny a man his right to private property"
would not appear to be asked by a Caldari. The State comes across as an
Asian meritocracy, which favors communal contribution, not an American
meritocracy, which favors individual uniqueness (as some may say). The
Gallente appear the latter.

If the Caldari State were about individual liberty, private property, and
the rejection of laws, then I would wonder why they are in staunch cultural
opposition to the Gallente. This is certainly not how I play them.
Svetlana; how would the Gallente fit in EVE's ideological framework if the
Caldari adopted an American libertarian outlook?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Alain Colcer on 22 Feb 2013, 19:48
haha never have seen such a detailed and properly articulated answer to provide the basic difference between Frog and Squid bravo!

indeed, personal wealth vs corporate wealth is to me one of the main motivators on the citizen level.

Gallente -> i'll work towards attaining wealth and personal social status
Caldari -> i'll work towards improving the wealth of my corporation and thus benefit my personal and coworkers social status
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 22 Feb 2013, 21:32
I must admit I am very confused to see Caldari and libertarianism in the same sentence. I would not misconstrue confederalism with libertarianism.
As far as the PF reads, each megacorporation appears to function as a government/state unto itself, and all seem to be very statist. Even the PF
which goes back before Tibus Heth (I am assuming the following is) alludes to this.

First the Caldari and Gallente are two branches of the same interplanetary culture.

Secondly, there are stations, worlds, and systems (possibly constellations) in the Federation where a megacorporation functions as a government/state unto itself all in a very statist manner.

Quote from: Wikipedia
Libertarianism is a set of related political philosophies which emphasize individual liberty, political freedom, and voluntary association.

This is the complete opposite of what we know of the Caldari.

The political philosophies presented to the majority tend to be draped in propaganda benefiting those in power.  In the case of the State (or an employee of Roden, CreoDron, Quafe, ORE, etc), much of that will focus on doing things for the good of the company.

Quote from: Deteis Bloodline description
Driven by the cultural premise that the good of the whole must come before the needs of the individual
  ...
Quote from: Caldari in-game description
Duty and discipline are required traits in Caldari citizens, plus unquestioning loyalty to the corporation they live to serve.

While Svetlana did a lot of work conjecturing a Caldari Prime drive behind the cultural premise (partially , it can equally be argued that a society that for the most part lives in space the good of the whole will be pushed to the fore by necessity and the propaganda will and culture will eventually reflect it.

When, as a result of an economic decision to secede from the Federation, the majority of Caldari found themselves on ships and stations far from any property they could call their own and in which strict observance of various forced military structures was needed simply to survive (at war without a vast agricultural reserve).

We may frame the Gallente-Caldari War as a cultural one, but at its core it was a question of economic power between corporate entities and government.

Quote from: Power Politics chronicle
He knows that even if Gallente society can be called a capitalistic one, the capitalism followed by the Gallenteans is fundamentally different than the one found in the Caldari State. For Gallenteans, the accumulation of wealth is something that is done on an individual level and personal wealth only matters in comparison to the wealth of other individuals. For the Caldari the economic wheels of the state are controlled by huge corporations and for corporations competition, efficiency and market share is more important than accumulation of wealth (although the latter is often a happy by-product of the former) - business for the good of the individual rather than the good of the many is something totally alien to the Caldari.

Is the assumption that Power Politics (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Power_Politics_(Chronicle)) is an unbiased infodump or a piece written by a Gallente with said bias?   The Caldari and Gallente were in constant contact for hundreds of years and had vast impact on each other's cultures.  The very premise of the Hethian Revolution is that the Caldari executives had for years not been living up to their propaganda and were engaged in the very individual accumulation of wealth described here as Gallente.


Quote from: http://community.eveonline.com/races/caldari.asp
As long as you keep in line, do your job, uphold the laws and so forth, life can be fairly pleasant and productive. But for those who are not cut out for this strict, disciplined regime life quickly becomes intolerable. They lose their respect, family, status, everything, and the only options left to them are suicide or exile

The third point directly undermines the political freedom aspect of libertarianism, what with 'unquestioning loyalty'. The last point directly undermines the 'voluntary association' element of libertarianism. According to libertarianism, the ability to refuse participation should not come with the consequence of losing everything. Participation in the State is compulsory if you desire to live your life.

Libertarianism however does not exclude the possibility of losing everything if you want to live your life.   The decisions you make will be judged by those around you and can very well result in your expulsion from a group, ie no one volunteers to be associated with you.  On Earth, this means you depart with "the clothes on your back" into "the wild," whatever that may be. 

Quote from: http://community.eveonline.com/races/gallenteGov_intro.asp
Any governmental interference to keep things in check through legislation and policing is naturally perceived as oppression of the rights and freedom of individuals, constantly creating tension.

Quote from: Gallente Immigrants Ancestry description
the libertarian culture

The Gallente dislike their government and appear to not want anything to do with it. This is in direct contrast to the Caldari, who put themselves
behind their government/megacorporation. Repeatedly in PF, we see the Gallente described as individualists and the Caldari as collectivists.
Libertarians are staunch critics of collectivism.

Excellent, we arrive at the challenges that a science-fiction scenario presents us to discuss political philosophy.

In the development of the ante bellum Federation, what were the preferences of various groups?   Did Gallente favor & push for terraforming, while the Caldari accepted more spartan living conditions?  Why didn't these two groups, who for hundreds of years worked hand-in-hand merge?   What allows the Gallente to retain the emphasis on individualism, which as a space-faring culture likely has numerous station emergency protocols (assuming a hazardous outside environment) likely calling for the sacrifice of a few for the survival of the greater whole?

I'm also confused as to where the Caldari belief in the right to private property comes from, not only considering they are collectivists, but also when considering the following;

Quote from: http://community.eveonline.com/races/caldari.asp
All land and real estate is owned by a company which leases it to the citizens

The question of "you wouldn't deny a man his right to private property" would not appear to be asked by a Caldari.

If the Caldari State were about individual liberty, private property, and the rejection of laws, then I would wonder why they are in staunch cultural
opposition to the Gallente. This is certainly not how I play them. Svetlana; how would the Gallente fit in EVE's ideological framework if the Caldari adopted an American libertarian outlook?

I return to the following.

The Caldari and Gallente are two branches of the same interplanetary culture.

Before there was a State, there were Federation registered corporations that went out beyond the reach of the Federation's laws and established outposts for themselves.

Both the Intaki Syndicate and ORE provide an opportunity to explore the concept of property ownership in addition to the State and Federation.

There are individuals in Caldari society, who with little backing from the State's larger corporations, are settling in Black Rise.

Quote from: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Black_Rise
Black Rise on the demographic level is otherwise an anomaly when compared to the rest of the State. Because of its widespread disconnection, several communities have sprung up that are completely independent of the Caldari authorities, who otherwise do not tolerate disconnected entities within their borders.

All the questions that can be asked of the Caldari State's corporations can be asked of a corporate domain in the Federation, particularly a space station.



All the above having been said - I suspect most take the simple road.  The State is/was a meritocratic Asian culture and the Federation is a meritocratic European culture.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Alain Colcer on 23 Feb 2013, 05:44

I return to the following.

The Caldari and Gallente are two branches of the same interplanetary culture.


If thats the absolute true, them i'm not able to explain or even begin to devise a way why caldari would put the well being of the group in front of the well being of the person.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Ciarente on 23 Feb 2013, 06:06

I return to the following.

The Caldari and Gallente are two branches of the same interplanetary culture.


If thats the absolute true, them i'm not able to explain or even begin to devise a way why caldari would put the well being of the group in front of the well being of the person.

You can actually see both attitudes within the same culture on Earth.  For example, in Australia, the typically capitalist pursuit of wealth by some has run, for most of our history, alongside a more collectivist ideal, with individuals contributing from often scant personal resources to projects such as lending libraries, mortgage lotteries, schools (in the days before free education), scholarship funds, and salaries for elected officials (in the days before elected officials were paid) so that those not independently wealthy could still stand for election.  People contributed to all these knowing they might not, and in some cases certainly would not, benefit personally.

Former New South Wales Labor Premier Neville Wran described it (and I am sure he pinched it from somewhere else) as 'rising with your class, not out of your class'.

I find it very easy to imagine that two cultures, separated for a period and then interacting, could nonetheless develop very different value systems.

Also, it's worth remembering that the Gallente article describes the Federation as having a comprehensive welfare system - indicating that not all Gallente cultural/political values are purely individualistic.

I imagine both societies as more complex than the eve-o-pedia articles describe - just as our own cultures are more complex than wikipedia articles!
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 23 Feb 2013, 11:20

I return to the following.

The Caldari and Gallente are two branches of the same interplanetary culture.


then i'm not able to explain or even begin to devise a way why caldari would put the well being of the group in front of the well being of the person.

Because at the Exodus the Caldari did not flee Caldari Prime for open terraformed verdant worlds where a single man and his agri-drones could build a homestead and survive on their own (the American ideal of liberty is somewhat wrapped up in this ideal).

At the Exodus, the Caldari crammed themselves into spaceships with limited resources and fled to space stations with hardware limits on how many people they could support effectively and limited total support for an influx of refugees (assumes a lack of replicators a la Star Trek).   On top of this, the rebelling Caldari then had to turn and fight the Federation to defend these limited resources (and potentially terraforming worlds*).

When living in a resource constrained system priorities become much more straight-forward.   Resource discipline & efficiency become ideas taught to children before they can walk.  Acknowledgment/acceptance that individual sacrifice ensures the survival of the whole (be it the colony, company, military unit, or nascent State) because should the worst happen, your life may be forfeit as the station/ship section is isolated to save the rest.  Now maintain that for 3 generations (100 years of war).

*This goes back to engineering preferences of the corporations involved.  If the Caldari generally lacked the expertise to terraform worlds, then it becomes a slower process as they learn that skill set.  Add to this the very real possibility of scorched world tactics by either accelerating terraformation to uncontrollable conditions or by interrupting it mid-terraformation.  If we assume that previous civilizations had also engaged in terraformation, there worlds may have either failed due to lack of on-going maintenance or become overgrown by nature itself.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 23 Feb 2013, 11:41
They weren't on ships forever though, they had places to go. Most of my speculation about the shaping of the Caldari psyche focused on the Caldari experience just after the collapse of the Eve Gate and prior to contact with the Gallente, when they were surviving on a harsh world with limited resources.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vieve on 23 Feb 2013, 13:25
In the development of the ante bellum Federation, what were the preferences of various groups?   Did Gallente favor & push for terraforming, while the Caldari accepted more spartan living conditions?  Why didn't these two groups, who for hundreds of years worked hand-in-hand merge?

I've been assuming that in the earliest days of colonization (that is, while the stargate network was being built), Gallente, Caldari and hybrid colonization interests all pointed themselves at systems based on survey data and simply hoped for the best.  They chose planets based on their perceived ability to support life without terraforming, or with whatever terraforming could be done in a relatively short period of time with the equipment or resources they were able to bring or believed they would be able to extract once they arrived in system.1

After the stargate network became established, colonization became less a question of "can this world sustain life with minimal intervention" and more a question of "are there resources on this world that make it economically feasible for us to make it habitable"?  I think Seyllin I is a good example of planets that likely weren't settled during the pre-stargate era. 

1I've always been willing to argue that Caldari colonizers in general favored worlds with harsher conditions than Gallente colonizers found optimal, and that this may have been one of the factors that discouraged their merging as peoples. Couple that with the notion that there may have been relatively few joint colonization efforts between the two peoples. One of these days, I should get around to posting my ridiculous ideas about pre-CDS-era Gallente-Caldari cooperation.  That is, if the new PF hasn't already contradicted them.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Ciarente on 24 Feb 2013, 22:47
[mod]Topic split to move discussions about gene-modding, kresh, et al to its own topic. Please let me know if you think a post has been mis-allocated so I can fixor.  [/mod]
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Desiderya on 27 Feb 2013, 09:42
Seems like Heth (http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=tibus-heth-denounces-blaques-rally-speech) has lost a bit of his crazy and is also back in the public again.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: ArtOfLight on 27 Feb 2013, 10:02
Seems like Heth (http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=tibus-heth-denounces-blaques-rally-speech) has lost a bit of his crazy and is also back in the public again.

Perhaps being shot at was a good wake up call for him.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Samira Kernher on 27 Feb 2013, 13:55
Reports of Unrest among Kaalakiota Factory Workers (http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=reports-of-unrest-among-kaalakiota-factory-workers)
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 27 Feb 2013, 13:58
The schadenfreude, it is delicious. Death to populists. :P
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Desiderya on 27 Feb 2013, 14:19
Rawr. Nice.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Gesakaarin on 27 Feb 2013, 16:47
And people said it was crazy for the Chairwoman of a Kaalakiota affiliated PMC to call into question the management of the company by its CEO.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Desiderya on 27 Feb 2013, 17:21
She only did that to get imprisoned in the greasedome, though.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Samira Kernher on 01 Mar 2013, 13:48
Home Guard and State Peacekeepers attack defenseless protestors. CONCORD intervenes too late. (http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=home-guard-and-state-peacekeepers-attack-defenseless-protestors-concord-intervenes-too-late)

Apparently the protestors' security opened fire first during the planet-side riots. The freighters and their passengers however did not undertake any violent action.

Heth has distanced himself and says he's going to launch an investigation.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Matoko on 01 Mar 2013, 14:04
Home Guard and State Peacekeepers attack defenseless protestors. CONCORD intervenes too late. (http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=home-guard-and-state-peacekeepers-attack-defenseless-protestors-concord-intervenes-too-late)

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Rc8k_D3yYoE/Tw4IyOKMysI/AAAAAAAAAls/awgasVzJMfA/s320/Stephen-Colbert-Popcorn.gif)
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Grideris on 01 Mar 2013, 14:45
Home Guard and State Peacekeepers attack defenseless protestors. CONCORD intervenes too late. (http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=home-guard-and-state-peacekeepers-attack-defenseless-protestors-concord-intervenes-too-late)

Apparently the protestors' security opened fire first during the planet-side riots. The freighters and their passengers however did not undertake any violent action.

Heth has distanced himself and says he's going to launch an investigation.

State Peacekeepers open fire with "non-lethal" fire first.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Saede Riordan on 01 Mar 2013, 21:57
Home Guard and State Peacekeepers attack defenseless protestors. CONCORD intervenes too late. (http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=home-guard-and-state-peacekeepers-attack-defenseless-protestors-concord-intervenes-too-late)

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Rc8k_D3yYoE/Tw4IyOKMysI/AAAAAAAAAls/awgasVzJMfA/s320/Stephen-Colbert-Popcorn.gif)
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Katrina Oniseki on 01 Mar 2013, 22:29
(http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/010/100/dis%20gon%20be%20good.gif)
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Aquila Shadow on 01 Mar 2013, 23:46
Home Guard and State Peacekeepers attack defenseless protestors. CONCORD intervenes too late. (http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=home-guard-and-state-peacekeepers-attack-defenseless-protestors-concord-intervenes-too-late)

Apparently the protestors' security opened fire first during the planet-side riots. The freighters and their passengers however did not undertake any violent action.

Heth has distanced himself and says he's going to launch an investigation.

State Peacekeepers open fire with "non-lethal" fire first.

Live rounds are a bit of a step up from less then lethal.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vikarion on 02 Mar 2013, 04:34
I'm participating in this as much as I can, with as much goodwill as I can muster, but I do confess that I still expect that it will just turn out to be CCP doing their best to wreck the State some more.

I know that some of my fellow Caldari RPers were encouraged by statements such as "we understand that the factions haven't been portrayed fairly" and etc, but I would suggest that they consider the distinct possibility that CCP thinks that they've portrayed the Caldari too well.

As well, I would have them note that CCP has constructed the fiction such that, no matter the efforts on the Caldari side in FW, the consequences of our fighting are portrayed as bad for the State. For example:

When FOOM took some of Black Rise for the Gallente, then lost it -> CCP lore states that the Fed conducted a scorched earth retreat, leaving BR a wasteland.

When Caldari took all systems -> Megas foolishly invested in those systems, then lost everything when systems were retaken 8 months or so later -> recession in the State. No positives for the State.

When Gallente took all systems -> more trouble for the State, Megas suffered more losses, etc. Caldari Prime situation becomes more precarious, Heth consolidates power, begins campaigns against State citizens on the ground.

Since we've taken most systems -> Tibus Heth going (more) nuts and killing State citizens for fun and...well, not profit.  :P  Gallente get rock concerts and continue to plan the retaking of Caldari Prime.

I think it needs to be clear to Caldari RPers that we should not be expecting positive outcomes for our faction. It may happen, but prior history and current story suggests that we have been and will continue to be the designated villain, continuing to perform standard villainous actions for the benefit of the heroes of the setting. I'm not trying to be negative, so much as I want to caution against enthusiasm. Even if we somehow get rid of Heth, our faction is not going to be portrayed positively, and the most we can hope for by our actions in FW is to constrain CCP from a litany of continual defeats in the news, due to incongruity with in-space actions.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Publius Valerius on 02 Mar 2013, 09:01
A stupid noob question, what are: State Peacekeepers? I found Expert Intervention, but havent found them here (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/DUST_514_NPC_Corporations). :cry:




Staat heißt das kälteste aller kalten Ungeheuer.*/State is the coldest of all cold monsters.
-Friedrich Nietzsche
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Grideris on 02 Mar 2013, 09:12
A stupid noob question, what are: State Peacekeepers? I found Expert Intervention, but havent found them here (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/DUST_514_NPC_Corporations). :cry:

They're a regular NPC corp that you can't join at all (even in DUST). Look it up in game. It's doesn't have a description though.


Staat heißt das kälteste aller kalten Ungeheuer.*/State is the coldest of all cold monsters.
-Friedrich Nietzsche
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 02 Mar 2013, 14:49
So now Heth is saying that the State can just take the territory the megacorporations paid for before in the auction?  And they are "investigating legal alternatives"?

I sincerely hope that is code for "figuring out how many nuclear weapons it takes to turn Tibus Heth's headquarters into a fine mist" or I'm going to be very upset. The State's enforcement authority for this is...what? Even if Tibus Heth was legally in the right, the State government doesn't have the force to back up a giant landgrab. :P
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Katrina Oniseki on 02 Mar 2013, 15:50
So now Heth is saying that the State can just take the territory the megacorporations paid for before in the auction?  And they are "investigating legal alternatives"?

I sincerely hope that is code for "figuring out how many nuclear weapons it takes to turn Tibus Heth's headquarters into a fine mist" or I'm going to be very upset. The State's enforcement authority for this is...what? Even if Tibus Heth was legally in the right, the State government doesn't have the force to back up a giant landgrab. :P

Holy shit. Here it comes.

The Megas are turning against Heth. Even Lai Dai has issued a statement against him!
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vikarion on 02 Mar 2013, 19:45
So now Heth is saying that the State can just take the territory the megacorporations paid for before in the auction?  And they are "investigating legal alternatives"?

I sincerely hope that is code for "figuring out how many nuclear weapons it takes to turn Tibus Heth's headquarters into a fine mist" or I'm going to be very upset. The State's enforcement authority for this is...what? Even if Tibus Heth was legally in the right, the State government doesn't have the force to back up a giant landgrab. :P

Holy shit. Here it comes.

The Megas are turning against Heth. Even Lai Dai has issued a statement against him!

What do you mean, "even Lai Dai"? The Patriots hate Heth, probably more than any other State faction. (According to the state of the cluster document released after FW started).
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Ciarente on 02 Mar 2013, 19:46
Haven't they always been the most cautious publicly, though? So putting out a statement is nailing the colors to the mast.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 02 Mar 2013, 20:28
Well then, I now have grounds to be more vocally anti-Heth given sufficient free time to do so.  "Never forget."
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Katrina Oniseki on 02 Mar 2013, 20:39
I guess we all have our misconceptions about the other blocs. I thought Patriots were mostly behind him.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 02 Mar 2013, 20:40
I think my question is...if the Patriots didn't support him, and the Liberals sure as hell didn't...why the hell would the Practicals go along with it and WHY DID ANYONE LET HIM DO ANYTHING IN THE FIRST PLACE!?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Ciarente on 02 Mar 2013, 20:43


Caldari superiority, both militarily and economically, is the chief concern of the Patriots. However, that rather jingoistic pride has been mortally injured by Tibus Heth's politically vicious rise. As a result, they generally refuse to admit, even to each other, that many of the things Heth has done are exactly what they themselves have wanted to do all along. While the wounds are still too fresh for them to feel anything but hatred for him, they realize that to defy him openly would harm the State (and their dominant position within it) immeasurably, so for now they play along with him and pretend (as much to themselves as to anyone else) that they're not immensely enjoying giving the Gallente a black eye. (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Caldari_Corporate_Factions#Patriots)

Generally the most pro-Heth of the three political groups, the Practicals appreciate the new opportunities he's delivered, and while being forced to cede political control to his Providence Directorate is not a slight that they will easily forgive or forget, they're generally prepared to play along with him for as long as his actions remain productive. They're fully aware, though, that this state of affairs won't last forever, and they're quietly assembling plans to ensure that when he is brought down, the Practicals won't find themselves hamstrung by the other corporations. If in the end they have to topple Heth themselves, then that's what they'll do. In the meantime, they're content to beat the war-drums and use the fighting as a cover for their other activities. (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Caldari_Corporate_Factions#Practicals)

Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 02 Mar 2013, 21:36
Yes, but...what has he done that has been good for the Practicals? Or anyone, aside from maybe the Patriots liking that they now have Caldari Prime? :P
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 02 Mar 2013, 23:24
Yes, but...what has he done that has been good for the Practicals? Or anyone, aside from maybe the Patriots liking that they now have Caldari Prime? :P

Which is the bigger issue; is CCP saying that the reforms did not occur at all?  It would be a very different story if the challenge was: we may not like the loss of corporate sovereignty, but you have to admit that KK is now filled with the best and brightest executives and managers and had the highest standard of living among the Caldari corps.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Kyoko Sakoda on 03 Mar 2013, 00:08
I think it is entirely reasonable to expect a dictator (or powerful figurehead) to rise on the promise of reform and then turn around and consolidate military power instead of tending to more important domestic matters they promised to. That seems to be a pretty regular theme in real-world political history.

And from the very beginning, including TEA, it has been emphasized that Heth is a politically naive man with a very narrow set of agendas.

This is somewhat of an accelerated timeline so far, but not altogether an unlikely chain of events.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 03 Mar 2013, 00:13
The bigger problem is that CCP basically broke the entire way the Caldari were supposed to work to get him there and now the dissolution is not particularly making much sense either. I never was very sure why everyone was following Heth in the first place.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Kyoko Sakoda on 03 Mar 2013, 00:15
You cannot act on the past but you can act on the future.

Very Gandhi, but I guess what I'm saying is give them a chance. :)
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Hamish Grayson on 03 Mar 2013, 06:40
Yes, but...what has he done that has been good for the Practicals? Or anyone, aside from maybe the Patriots liking that they now have Caldari Prime? :P

The Practicals push a type of neo-mercantilisim and the taking of Placid fits in with this agenda.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 03 Mar 2013, 11:00
The Practicals push a type of neo-mercantilisim and the taking of Placid fits in with this agenda.

Well, it clearly didn't work out so great with that now....
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Hamish Grayson on 03 Mar 2013, 12:14
Neo-mercantilism never does.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 03 Mar 2013, 21:36
The Practicals push a type of neo-mercantilisim and the taking of Placid fits in with this agenda.

Well, it clearly didn't work out so great with that now....

SuVee was in Essence anyhow and NoH & CBD have business presence in the Federation anyhow.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 04 Mar 2013, 00:33
Really no new discussion points on IGS despite the story moving forward... oh well.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Anslol on 04 Mar 2013, 11:56
delete
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: kalaratiri on 04 Mar 2013, 12:51
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHyObf4Csfc Just a video of the New Caldari event for anyone who couldn't be there
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 05 Mar 2013, 20:34
Reading the most recent article, I am concerned that the storyline is actually not going to be a dead Heth and the ending of the CPD & office of Executor, but its solidification.   :cry:
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Samira Kernher on 05 Mar 2013, 20:56
Numerous Caldari management resign. Heth promises significant investigations. (http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=numerous-caldari-management-resign-heth-promises-significant-investigations)

Could indeed lead to the CPD installing puppet managers, although I don't think they have that much executive authority to do something like that outside of KK. I would assume the other corps would still be able to promote their own management.

Even if they could, I think things have progressed too far by now for Heth to be able to save himself.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vikarion on 06 Mar 2013, 01:33
Reading the most recent article, I am concerned that the storyline is actually not going to be a dead Heth and the ending of the CPD & office of Executor, but its solidification.   :cry:

Never underestimate how much CCP likes to grief its players.  :P
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Matoko on 06 Mar 2013, 01:49
So KK does something stupid. I can see why their leadership would resign. But... All megas? Why all of the megas?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Ciarente on 06 Mar 2013, 02:08
It's a kind of civil disobedience, I think. A protest against, not their own management, but the current direction of the State.

Akin to a general strike? (although obviously, different in the specifics)
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Matoko on 06 Mar 2013, 02:38
I suppose so, just seems a bit... Excessive, I guess. KK management should be "Oh shit..." enough. All the megas feels more like "trying too hard" than anything.  Hyasyoda and Ishukone in particular I'd expect to be dancing in the boardrooms. Even if quietly.

EDIT: To be fair, they actually could be in all honesty...
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Publius Valerius on 06 Mar 2013, 03:02
So KK does something stupid. I can see why their leadership would resign. But... All megas? Why all of the megas?
:lol: I already can see, that some of those managers will get busted with a cheap hooker in the passenger seat and a bag of coke in the glovebox on their way thru Fed-space.... and end up on  one of those embarrassing gallente celebrity TV shows..  :lol:
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 06 Mar 2013, 13:15
Yeah, this article isn't exactly thrilling me. Why would a blanket 3% of management quit, especially in a society where you are your job? Where would they go even if they did? I could understand if a bunch of upper management in one or two megacorps resigned (and were immediately picked up by some other megacorp), but why exactly would that many people resign at the same time from widely disparate megas? If it is supposed to be some sort of coordinated protest, doing so without saying anything seems weird, and what are they protesting if they resigned from all megacorporations at once?

Blanket statistics aren't particularly great for storylines anyway...it would be a lot more interesting if it was a few high-profile resignations that they could focus on to give people something to speculate on rather than just talking about a faceless mass.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Lyn Farel on 06 Mar 2013, 13:44
I would have taken them more seriously if they drank tea instead.  :D
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Gesakaarin on 06 Mar 2013, 18:42
Who knows, maybe those Executives will form a Caldari version of the Sons of Liberty and will proceed to throw CPD tea out the airlocks to protest the oppression of the CPD and the unfair governance of the Executor.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Ollie on 06 Mar 2013, 18:50
Why would a blanket 3% of management quit, especially in a society where you are your job? Where would they go even if they did?

The Guristas? The 'other' megacorp of the Caldari societal structure.

The Guristas offer them sanctuary, structure, purpose, jobs, etc. In return, the ex-management put high level corporate secrets and insider knowledge on the table. Meritocracy pirate-style.

Add to the conspiracy theory soup in liberal doses these possible ingredients: Ishukone's suspected role in the destabilisation process and the former KK CEO's "too late" message from her garden where she's long been plotting out Heth's downfall.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 06 Mar 2013, 18:57
The Guristas are not "another megacorp." They may have their place, but they exist outside Caldari society specifically -- their status as outsiders is what makes them useful as a outlet to the Caldari. They may carry some degree of respect and honor (as the yakuza in Japan or the Triads in China), but they are definitely not seen as being part of legitimate Caldari society. In a society that is all about face, no Gurista (at least, no known Gurista -- Gariushi never disclosed his past for a reason) would ever be accorded the respect of a legitimate member of the Caldari executive class.

If that is the intention, I will be extremely disappointed. CCP seems to have a hard-on for the pirate factions, which rankles me to no end.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Ollie on 06 Mar 2013, 19:08
I remember at least one reference either in a chronicle or - more likely - an ingame text blurb during a mission which referenced them as the 'other' (unofficial) megacorp of Caldari society. I'll see if I can track that down, but it referenced it in the same context as you're using - that is, certainly not a legitimate entity but as a means for those who become persona non grata to find a purpose that still has some connection, no matter how tenuous, to the society that bred them.

You're exactly right in stating this makes them "useful as an outlet to the Caldari" who are in the position some of these executives must now be facing.

I'm curious - why would you be 'disappointed' if this speculative storyline is the one that turns out to be what CCP is pursuing? How else would you propose they resolve a storyline that at this point has highly placed Caldari executives across the State delivering a public and much publicised slap in the face to its Executor and the CPD? Tagging them as "criminals", "traitors" and spais seems to be (at the least) a propaganda victory for the Heth leadership.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 06 Mar 2013, 19:27
Because it doesn't make much sense, mostly, and because it continues the way CCP has been writing the Caldari for the last 5 years where they seem to have forgotten how the Caldari were set up in the first place. You know, where there's no central authority and the central government only exists at the whim of the megacorps because they each have personal armies that dwarf the State's military? Instead, we have another boring fascist government where the ones with actual power seem to have forgotten they have the ability to tell a demagogue dragging them down "go fuck yourself". I get tired of the legitimate states of the cluster being made out to be horrible places, full of idiots and sneering villains, but the parasites that live on the fringes of society and survive by sponging off it are really not that bad and totally super awesome, man. Down with the system!

Fuuuuuuck that. Svetlana may not like the Federation or the Republic (or the Empire entirely, for that matter), but she still puts them head and shoulders above any of the "pirate empires." And it's been far too long since any of the empire RPers have had anything they could truly rally around. Give us something to fight for rather than fight against, for crying out loud. You want to know why Caldari RP has been sucked out? Because most Caldari RPers have gotten tired of trying to justify or go along with the utterly retarded and pointless acts of their faction. Why has Federation RP had such a shitty time since forever? Because CCP has made them so fucking bland for so long, and then turned them into incompetent boobs and caricatures of the worst parts of post-9/11 America that it's hard for anyone to actually feel passionate about their ideals. The Amarr and Minmatar have easy rallying cries (religion and abolition, respectively), but even they could use something more meaty.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Ollie on 06 Mar 2013, 19:52
Fair enough and good answer. Rather than potentially derailing this thread, I'll make a new one (http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=4300.0) to see if anyone's interested in discussing 'possible' plotlines or ideas we'd like to see in events that focus on Empire/Fed/State/Republic RP?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 07 Mar 2013, 07:30
The Amarr and Minmatar have easy rallying cries (religion and abolition, respectively), but even they could use something more meaty.
I don't mean to derail this thread, but really, this is so making me twitch. The Caldari and the Federation aren't portrayed sophisticated enough and that's bad for numerous reasons, but it's good that the Amarr and Matar have 'easy rallying cries'? Amarr RP is suffering for quite some time under how the Amarr are portrayed by PF. I heared the Matari did, too and I'd agree. The Caldari (and Feds) aren't the only ones suffering here.

I mean, really, if the simple rallying cires ar OK for you, Heth is offering plenty of these, it's nothing meaty, but hey: It's not that bad, is it?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 07 Mar 2013, 09:44
I did say that the Amarr and Minmatar could use something more meaty, but they do have something to fall back on if that doesn't come through. The Caldari and Gallente do not really have that. I agree, I would like to see the Amarr have a reason to fight other than "rawr, for god!" and the Minmatar have something other than "rawr, slavery", but at least you HAVE that. Can you tell me what the Caldari and Gallente are fighting over now? :P
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Desiderya on 07 Mar 2013, 11:03
Rawr, for the homeworld.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 07 Mar 2013, 11:28
Rawr, for the homeworld.
That, exactly, Svetlana. Thanks Des.

Feds have:

Rawr, for Freedom.
Rawr, for individuality.
Rawr, for democracy.
Rawr, for human rights.

I can go on...
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 07 Mar 2013, 12:02
Rawr, for the homeworld.

Except that CCP spent the first five years of Eve's existence claiming that most Caldari didn't seriously consider Caldari Prime worth fighting over. And now, it's not under any sort of actual threat.

And yes, Nicoletta, the Gallente have that, but...that's not a reason really to fight AGAINST anyone. They aren't at war with the Caldari because of any of those reasons. They're at war because...well, who knows. They certainly aren't under an existential threat from the Caldari (or at least, they shouldn't be).
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 07 Mar 2013, 12:17
Of course it is, the Caldari are against freedom, against democracy, against individual human rights.

The cheap lines are cheap lines, true, but that's as well going for the Matari and Amarr.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Anslol on 07 Mar 2013, 12:38
Rawr, for saving face and reinforcing the population view that we are avenging the people of Nouvelle Rouvenor...even though we started it all by being dicks.

That's basically the motivation. That and hurrhurr affront to our ideals from a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT RACE. Hey let's kill them all and teach them a lesson!

Yes, I'm jaded/bitter. Sue me.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: ArtOfLight on 07 Mar 2013, 13:39
Malcolm often chooses to argue that the Caldari are fighting against the hypocritical Federation. A Federation that espouses freedom, but only if you do it their way. A Federation that champions individual liberty and equality, but only if you have good representation in Congress. A Federation that continues to assert their superiority over anyone else.

Fighting for Caldari Prime is well and good, given the cultural importance to the Caldari, but Caldari Prime is simply a symbol, representing all that the Caldari are APART from the Federation.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: BloodBird on 07 Mar 2013, 15:09
Because it doesn't make much sense, mostly, and because it continues the way CCP has been writing the Caldari for the last 5 years where they seem to have forgotten how the Caldari were set up in the first place. You know, where there's no central authority and the central government only exists at the whim of the megacorps because they each have personal armies that dwarf the State's military? Instead, we have another boring fascist government where the ones with actual power seem to have forgotten they have the ability to tell a demagogue dragging them down "go fuck yourself". I get tired of the legitimate states of the cluster being made out to be horrible places, full of idiots and sneering villains, but the parasites that live on the fringes of society and survive by sponging off it are really not that bad and totally super awesome, man. Down with the system!

Fuuuuuuck that. Svetlana may not like the Federation or the Republic (or the Empire entirely, for that matter), but she still puts them head and shoulders above any of the "pirate empires." And it's been far too long since any of the empire RPers have had anything they could truly rally around. Give us something to fight for rather than fight against, for crying out loud. You want to know why Caldari RP has been sucked out? Because most Caldari RPers have gotten tired of trying to justify or go along with the utterly retarded and pointless acts of their faction. Why has Federation RP had such a shitty time since forever? Because CCP has made them so fucking bland for so long, and then turned them into incompetent boobs and caricatures of the worst parts of post-9/11 America that it's hard for anyone to actually feel passionate about their ideals. The Amarr and Minmatar have easy rallying cries (religion and abolition, respectively), but even they could use something more meaty.

There should be a like system for posts like this.

Why is there not a like system for posts like this?

Rawr, for the homeworld.

Except that CCP spent the first five years of Eve's existence claiming that most Caldari didn't seriously consider Caldari Prime worth fighting over. And now, it's not under any sort of actual threat.

And yes, Nicoletta, the Gallente have that, but...that's not a reason really to fight AGAINST anyone. They aren't at war with the Caldari because of any of those reasons. They're at war because...well, who knows. They certainly aren't under an existential threat from the Caldari (or at least, they shouldn't be).

Well, frankly they are at war because the State invaded them. If the invasion had never happened there would still be peace and quiet. They had no reason to go to war at all, and as far as EVE's history is concerned, the only time the Fed has been aggressive about starting a conflict was to stomp Sansha, otherwise all their conflicts have been started by others.

They did not even care to deck the Serpentis despite countless reasons to do so :/
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 07 Mar 2013, 15:22
The Caldari didn't really have any reason to fight either. This is the issue with the whole thing...the entire conflict between the Caldari and Gallente is a contrivance, and it feels like a contrivance. Both sides have no long term interest in the fighting continuing...yet they have to go through the motions because CCP demands it.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Gesakaarin on 07 Mar 2013, 16:12
Right now I sometimes think if it would be far more interesting if all the Empire's get brought to the negotiating table by CONCORD to declare official ceasefires (but not an actual end to the official wars) and have the CEWPA zones turn into the New Eden version of the Koran DMZ where capsuleers fight an actual proxy conflict in a new cold war. Then make it clear that from an official standpoint at least all the CONCORD signatories will say, "There is no war, we're at peace, everyone is happy now."

With no more official war, the occurrence of violence in the CEWPA zones are simply minor disagreements by "Sanctioned Peacekeepers". It would also be more fun where if FW was more about fighting an ambiguous war more about new profit opportunities for armaments sales for corporate mercenaries than the current contrivance where it has to be pushed primarily through factional extremists.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 07 Mar 2013, 16:21
Yeah, that's pretty much how I feel. Turn all lowsec into disputed territories, end the "war" and return to the cold war posture from before TEA with privateers.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Gesakaarin on 07 Mar 2013, 16:30
I also think what would be interesting is if there was a brokered peace so to speak if there was an ability for the pirate factions to get involved in FW. What I mean by this is that with the pullout of military assets from the CEWPA zones would be seen as opportunity for criminal cartels to move in and make use of the chaos and devastation.

You could have them used as opposing proxies and sometime allies, as in the State helping to fund the Serpentis activities in Placid and the Fed funding Gurista in Black Rise. It would certainly add scope for all sorts of shenanigans in low-sec as government mercenary "peacekeepers" and their "pirate" allies attempt to screw each other over, all the while denying that any such dubious activities are in fact taking place in the former warzones.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Hamish Grayson on 08 Mar 2013, 06:45
That's really a cool idea.   Although I rather see the State funding the Gurista and the Fed the Serps.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Louella Dougans on 10 Mar 2013, 10:39
http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=provists-arrest-at-least-five-executives-supposed-federation-operatives (http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?of=true&newsTitle=provists-arrest-at-least-five-executives-supposed-federation-operatives)

[spoiler]
Quote
Provists arrest at least five executives, supposed Federation operatives
reported by CCP Eterne | 2013-03-10T03:09:00Z

New Caldari – Five executives, two of whom had recently resigned from their posts as part of a State-wide protest against the policies of State Executor Tibus Heth, have been arrested by the Caldari Provincial Directorate under charges of espionage and treason. The executives were all arrested shortly after 13:00 EST in a coordinated raid.

Two of the executives, former-Wiyrkomi vice president Ikane Hadonei and former-Sukuuvestaa CTO Genkarhaadan Nineven, had resigned as part of the mass-resignation that occurred last week. Nineven in particular had been exceedingly harsh in his denouncement of the Heth regime following his resignation, telling reporters in an interview, “The State is no longer the place I was born into. The 'meritocratic reforms' are a lie. Leaving my position was an incredibly difficult decision, but when I saw others doing it, I knew I couldn't sit by any more. If the cowardly CEP is happy to let our culture and way of life be destroyed, then I am tired of yelling into deaf ears. Better to take my wealth, go somewhere else, and make a better place for true Caldari.”

Nineven was reportedly arrested following a raid on his suite which left three members of his security staff hospitalized. Ikane Hadonei was arrested in the middle of an interview with Zoar and Sons. The other three executives, Mecantile Club Chief Procurement Officer Okkala Sahola, State and Region Bank's Chief Commercial Officer Sandere Lourdhen, and CBD Sell Division's Public Relations Officer Evvlynne Deermin were arrested in their corporate offices.

The Provists initially refused to release any statements on the arrests or even acknowledge their occurrence, but shortly before press time issued a short bulletin saying, “These high-profile individuals were identified by our investigations as having ties to Federation intelligence and being involved in a prolonged plan to destabilize the State government.”

CBD Sell Division released a statement saying, “We take accusations of treason and espionage very seriously. We will cooperate fully with investigators to uncover the full truth.” Meanwhile, both the Mercantile Club and State and Region Bank have put their full support behind the arrested executives, promising the weight of their legal divisions in defending the accused.

Rumors have claimed that others, particularly those involved in the mass resignations, have been arrested, but none have been confirmed.
[/spoiler]

Everyone who is against Heth may now be accused of being a Spy for the Federation ?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Lyn Farel on 10 Mar 2013, 12:35
Great purge ?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Matoko on 10 Mar 2013, 12:36
Saw that one coming from a mile away.

Probably like how anyone advocating peace with the Caldari in the Federation is going to be nominally labeled as well. Odd parallels, eh?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Kyoko Sakoda on 10 Mar 2013, 16:20
Relevant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Ollie on 10 Mar 2013, 17:09
Relevant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g

True.

That said, just because you're paranoid doesn't necessarily mean you're wrong (http://community.eveonline.com/background/potw/default.asp?cid=06-04-10). :)
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Kyoko Sakoda on 10 Mar 2013, 18:18
I read that Svetlana's character on IGS pointed out Heth's politicization of the State as one of his many character faults. The truth is though -- and the reason behind me referencing Monty Python -- is that everything is political. Everything is the Way It Is because it comes down to human interaction and consensus. A state doesn't need to be a democracy for this to be true.

I think it's pretty cool.  :D
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Karmilla Strife on 22 Mar 2013, 10:01
Those of you posting the logs from local chat for this event on IGS, are awesome.  :cube:
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 25 Mar 2013, 18:38
Oh look Ishukone are the "heroes" again. (http://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/world-news/ishukone-access-to-caldari-prime-approved-full-negotiations-still-ongoing/)

It is to be expected, those collaborating Gallente-loving half-breeds.   ;)
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Sakura Nihil on 25 Mar 2013, 18:42
Ishukone: Cool Dudes & Dudettes
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 25 Mar 2013, 18:52
Oh look Ishukone are the "heroes" again. (http://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/world-news/ishukone-access-to-caldari-prime-approved-full-negotiations-still-ongoing/)

It is to be expected, those collaborating Gallente-loving half-breeds.   ;)

Now now, don't be jealous...
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Valdezi on 25 Mar 2013, 21:07
Oh look Ishukone are the heroes again.

Yep.  :D
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vikarion on 25 Mar 2013, 21:12
*grumble*

(It's expected of me)
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vincent Pryce on 25 Mar 2013, 23:03
Saving Intaki from the resource rapesquad at the cost of near bankruptcy has it's advantages.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Bong-cha Jones on 25 Mar 2013, 23:07
Well, good.  Ishukone exists solely for the twin purposes of negotiating rationally with the Federation and giving Hyasyoda an ass to kiss.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vikarion on 25 Mar 2013, 23:07
Saving Intaki from the resource rapesquad at the cost of near bankruptcy has it's advantages.

You know, as far as I'm aware, there's no PF that the Megas actually took off with the resources of any system. According to the news articles I have read, they got really badly burned because they were investing in the systems.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vikarion on 25 Mar 2013, 23:08
Well, good.  Ishukone exists solely for the twin purposes of negotiating rationally with the Federation and giving Hyasyoda an ass to kiss.

It is sorta the Mary Sue Mega, crowned princess by TonyG. But hey, what are we gonna do?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vincent Pryce on 25 Mar 2013, 23:18
Saving Intaki from the resource rapesquad at the cost of near bankruptcy has it's advantages.

You know, as far as I'm aware, there's no PF that the Megas actually took off with the resources of any system. According to the news articles I have read, they got really badly burned because they were investing in the systems.

Just going by the chronicle, just going by the chronicle.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vikarion on 25 Mar 2013, 23:24
Saving Intaki from the resource rapesquad at the cost of near bankruptcy has it's advantages.

You know, as far as I'm aware, there's no PF that the Megas actually took off with the resources of any system. According to the news articles I have read, they got really badly burned because they were investing in the systems.

Just going by the chronicle, just going by the chronicle.

Which one?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vincent Pryce on 25 Mar 2013, 23:27
Saving Intaki from the resource rapesquad at the cost of near bankruptcy has it's advantages.

You know, as far as I'm aware, there's no PF that the Megas actually took off with the resources of any system. According to the news articles I have read, they got really badly burned because they were investing in the systems.

Just going by the chronicle, just going by the chronicle.

Which one?

The one where Ishukone purchases all the rights to Intaki?
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vikarion on 25 Mar 2013, 23:51
The one where Ishukone purchases all the rights to Intaki?

Ah. Again, I don't believe that actually has any claim that the Mega's do "rape" the systems. After all, it occurs before the auction.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Bong-cha Jones on 26 Mar 2013, 00:05
It is sorta the Mary Sue Mega, crowned princess by TonyG. But hey, what are we gonna do?

No.  Mary Sues don't take it on the chin as often as Ishukone has, and they aren't as small and weak in comparison to their peers
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 26 Mar 2013, 00:07
Eh. I will grant that Ishukone is one of the few megas that has seen any real development on its own, but that's less because they're a Mary Sue and more because they are simply the one that is the only voice of opposition to Heth (and even that has been pathetically muted).
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Silver Night on 26 Mar 2013, 00:12
Saving Intaki from the resource rapesquad at the cost of near bankruptcy has it's advantages.

You know, as far as I'm aware, there's no PF that the Megas actually took off with the resources of any system. According to the news articles I have read, they got really badly burned because they were investing in the systems.

It probably takes pretty substantial capital to start up planetary-scale mining operations, or begin laying down million-square-kilometer-scale agriculture. That is an investment that also includes then taking resources back out of those systems - in fact, getting resources out of those systems is probably why they would invest int eh first place. Not only are the two not mutually exclusive - I would suggest that for most purposes, you cannot have the one (extracting resources of whatever sort) without the other (investing in the things that extract resources, whether literal mining facilities, or factories, or infrastructure).


As far as Ishukone goes, it just makes good sense for them - politically it is going to strengthen their position, because it may swing some of the in-between corporations to their side. It would be surprising if SuVee and NOH for example wanted to spend the money to help KK fight the Federation when they could be selling Federal citizens protein delicacies and specialty Caldari porn instead. Plus, Ishukone has more foreign exposure than most of the others, it seems, so they benefit from things not devolving into all-out war. And if they reach some kind of acceptable compromise on Caldari Prime, it makes them look good, and makes Heth look like an asshole.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 26 Mar 2013, 00:25
Eh. I will grant that Ishukone is one of the few megas that has seen any real development on its own, but that's less because they're a Mary Sue and more because they are simply the one that is the only voice of opposition to Heth (and even that has been pathetically muted).

Ishukone received independent development prior to TEA.  I don't think the opposition to Heth really added to much to the previous development.

Plus, Ishukone has more foreign exposure than most of the others, it seems, so they benefit from things not devolving into all-out war.

KK has a lot of foreign exposure as well (see their station distribution).  The only two corps without significant presence outside the State are Lai Dai and Hyasyoda (again referencing station distribution).
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 26 Mar 2013, 00:27
For obvious reasons, I don't think KK is going to make much progress with the Gallente, and I'm not sure the Practicals are ready to jump off the Heth train yet, though I'm sure they are reconsidering their previous support at this point. That doesn't leave many other options...
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vikarion on 26 Mar 2013, 00:32
It is sorta the Mary Sue Mega, crowned princess by TonyG. But hey, what are we gonna do?

No.  Mary Sues don't take it on the chin as often as Ishukone has, and they aren't as small and weak in comparison to their peers

Eh, I was mostly referring to its treatment in TEA, where it pretty much does serve that function.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 26 Mar 2013, 00:38
As someone who has been an Ishukone player from the get go (and never read Ruthless), let me just say that I was not happy about much of what happened in TEA. Especially since the CEO looked utterly retarded ("hey, I'll just leave my clone IN THE SPACE STATION I'M IN ALL THE TIME") and his sister looked weak and feckless (yet another of my critiques about TEA's misogynistic undercurrent, if you missed it). And then she GIVES AWAY insorum to the Minmatar. Smart. Move. Why did we chase Hnolku down again if you were just going to give it away to the Minmatar anyway?

Ishukone is one of the few megacorporations that's had a significant amount of development about what it is like aside from being Caldari. That is a crying shame and I'd really like to hear more about SuVee, NOH, and Lai Dai especially.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Silver Night on 26 Mar 2013, 00:41
As someone who has been an Ishukone player from the get go (and never read Ruthless), let me just say that I was not happy about much of what happened in TEA. Especially since the CEO looked utterly retarded ("hey, I'll just leave my clone IN THE SPACE STATION I'M IN ALL THE TIME") and his sister looked weak and feckless (yet another of my critiques about TEA's misogynistic undercurrent, if you missed it). And then she GIVES AWAY insorum to the Minmatar. Smart. Move. Why did we chase Hnolku down again if you were just going to give it away to the Minmatar anyway?

Ishukone is one of the few megacorporations that's had a significant amount of development about what it is like aside from being Caldari. That is a crying shame and I'd really like to hear more about SuVee, NOH, and Lai Dai especially.

I'm in the same boat as Svetlana, and agree pretty much completely.

As far as Ishukone foreign exposure, it is not just station distribution - it is based in part on assumptions, though. Given what we know about the 'Liberal' block, and Ishukone's place in it, it seems safe to suspect that they would gain the most benefit from somewhat normalized relationships outside the State - particularly with the Fed and to some degree the Republic.

Also, Lai Dai has deals with the Khanid, don't they? Just not stations?

Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 26 Mar 2013, 00:42
I don't know about Lai Dai, but I know NOH does through Modern Finance.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Gesakaarin on 26 Mar 2013, 01:02
KK has a lot of foreign exposure as well (see their station distribution).  The only two corps without significant presence outside the State are Lai Dai and Hyasyoda (again referencing station distribution).

SuVee doesn't have station assets outside the State, although knowing them they probably conduct a lot of their foreign business via front companies and other dubious corporate practices.

As for the Megas themselves I don't think they've moved much more beyond:

Patriots: Lets wear jackboots

Liberals: Can't we all be friends?

Practicals: Greed is Good.

It doesn't help that aside from the Lai Dai-SuVee affair, almost all Caldari news generally boils down to Kaalakiota being bellicose and Ishukone being the peacemakers.

And that's about it really.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Katrina Oniseki on 26 Mar 2013, 01:07
Speaking as a member of I-RED, who has played the good and bad sides of Ishukone for a while now... I can say that having the Caldari underdog called a Mary Sue is frankly silly. I use the word "silly" because stronger words might earn me a moderator's ire.

Yes, we're the 'nice guys'... but don't think for a second that this is something to be admired in EVE. We've gotten kicked between the legs since TEA more times than I can count. Even OOC, our affiliations and PF leave people sometimes hesitant to trust Ishukone aligned roleplayers as legitimate Caldari.

We might not be evil Nazi jackboot Provists, but we're sometimes portrayed/considered just as ridiculously, as spineless cowards who love the Gallente.

So please, Vikarion... don't say Ishukone is a Mary Sue, unless you're saying Mary Sues are the underdog.

Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Vikarion on 26 Mar 2013, 01:10
As someone who has been an Ishukone player from the get go (and never read Ruthless), let me just say that I was not happy about much of what happened in TEA. Especially since the CEO looked utterly retarded ("hey, I'll just leave my clone IN THE SPACE STATION I'M IN ALL THE TIME") and his sister looked weak and feckless (yet another of my critiques about TEA's misogynistic undercurrent, if you missed it). And then she GIVES AWAY insorum to the Minmatar. Smart. Move. Why did we chase Hnolku down again if you were just going to give it away to the Minmatar anyway?

Ishukone is one of the few megacorporations that's had a significant amount of development about what it is like aside from being Caldari. That is a crying shame and I'd really like to hear more about SuVee, NOH, and Lai Dai especially.

I'm fairly sure that TonyG doesn't think that you can be both a good businessman/businesswoman and a good person. It was kind of a telling note that he seemed to almost totally did tout the near-bankruptcy of Ishukone as a good thing - "look! A business that isn't in it for the money!", and saw the give-away of Insorum as a completely selfless act, as opposed to a total betrayal of Ishukone's employees, shareholders, and subsidiaries.

When I call Ishukone a Mary Sue, I mean it as an extension of Garuishi, and only in TEA (well, Garuishi is pretty over-the-top in Ruthless, too). It certainly isn't after TEA. By the way, don't read Ruthless before taking some blood pressure medication.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Aelisha Montenagre on 26 Mar 2013, 03:24
TBH Ishukone's current behaviour is both characterful (them being the most accessible interface for State diplomacy - especially with the Federation), and to the benefit of returning to an 8 representative State.  If Ishukone can act independently enough, driving support of Heth down further, the other megas will start placing their wagers and showing their hands. 

As a Sukuuvestaa roleplayer, and a minority, it would be foolish of me to expect a focal point of any Arc progress to focus on my faction, but I can assume all of the blocs will have their game plans ready for Heth dying, topping himself or getting the push. 

Ishukone is keeping itself alive and progressing through reaching out to those who share their ire with certain elements of the State at present, in the interests of the State as they see it should be.

Suvee and the Practicals, apparently staunch supporters of Heth, are probably waiting for the failcascade.  Get liquid, voice support, wait for property prices to drop.  They lost out to the auction, you can bet they have some pretty questionable plans in motion to recoup and profit should the centralised system wracking the State go into spasm.  Until then, voice support hoping that if there is a transition instead of a revolution, you get bequeathed some substantial assets for your 'life long support'. 

KK and the Patriots, noted as being leery of Heth but in favour of aggressive foreign policy are the ones in a bind right now.  KK is effectively owned by Heth, making it very much a victim.  Wiyrkomi are kind of out in the cold, looking in on the system and the issues it causes for their traditional values versus their loyalty to the State as an entity.  KK is still the strongest individual mega in terms of raw power projection, to my understanding, but should Heth really go off the rails that may not be true for much longer.  However, if anyone is going to strike at Heth directly, my money would be on a KK executive, possibly with Liberal collusion. 

Practicals stand to gain (or at least maintain status quo financially and socio-politically) regardless of outcome if they play it right, Patriots and Liberals would gain immediately by the removal of Heth before he decides to lose any more multi-tens-of-billions assets in a muscle flexing vanity move. 

Here's looking forwards to how this ties up, and the potential return to an 8 member council.  Oh and increasing that land ownership for Suvee would be nice ;).   
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 26 Mar 2013, 08:02
Also, Lai Dai has deals with the Khanid, don't they? Just not stations?

LD had shares in Khanid Innovations and was written as having interest in the Empire-based Cathum Conglomerate.

KK has a lot of foreign exposure as well (see their station distribution).  The only two corps without significant presence outside the State are Lai Dai and Hyasyoda (again referencing station distribution).

SuVee doesn't have station assets outside the State, although knowing them they probably conduct a lot of their foreign business via front companies and other dubious corporate practices.

How did I miss that  :bash:

It doesn't help that aside from the Lai Dai-SuVee affair, almost all Caldari news generally boils down to Kaalakiota being bellicose and Ishukone being the peacemakers.

And that's about it really.

There was also a string of articles about business in the Kingdom involving Wiyrkomi and Hyasyoda IIRC.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Svetlana Scarlet on 26 Mar 2013, 09:09
There was also a thinly veiled war of sabotage between Hyasyoda and SuVee at one point, I think. And I think calling the Practicals staunch supporters of Heth is probably a misnomer...like I said earlier, I think it's more correct to say they are waiting until they think they have more to gain from pulling their support than from lending it, and I suspect that point grows closer every day.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Aelisha Montenagre on 26 Mar 2013, 09:30
Yeah that was an almost direct quotation of the wiki, not my personal opinion.  Personally, 'lip service' or 'cupboard love' express the relationship a lot more. 

Rise or fall, supporting a dictator for self preservation and later personal gain seems up their alley.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: BloodBird on 26 Mar 2013, 16:56
Speaking as a member of I-RED, who has played the good and bad sides of Ishukone for a while now... I can say that having the Caldari underdog called a Mary Sue is frankly silly. I use the word "silly" because stronger words might earn me a moderator's ire.

Yes, we're the 'nice guys'... but don't think for a second that this is something to be admired in EVE. We've gotten kicked between the legs since TEA more times than I can count. Even OOC, our affiliations and PF leave people sometimes hesitant to trust Ishukone aligned roleplayers as "legitimate Caldari."

We might not be evil Nazi jackboot Provists, but we're sometimes portrayed/considered just as ridiculously, as spineless cowards who love the Gallente.

So please, Vikarion... don't say Ishukone is a Mary Sue, unless you're saying Mary Sues are the underdog.

"Fixing" shit for others isn't nice in most cases but right here I need to make a point.

The way you phrased the original post made it seem like your buying into the opinions of others OOC who seem to think Ishukone-Caldari RP is not 'proper' or whatever. I'm confident this is not so and my brief impression is inaccurate, but I will share some opinion regardless.

In short and without apology, that's bullshit. No-one get to tell you how to RP or how legit or not your choice is. Sure, we can nudge players in the direction of PF they seem to have missed when they are heavily out of line, or slap the silly out of folks who want to bring their Orc Shaman's to EVE and RP, or some other entirely outlandish thing, but RP'ing a Caldari who sees the State and intra-State / State-Fed RP different from them?

I would honestly propose that the next time (if ever) anyone goes and tells you your doing it wrong and should stop, for not RP'ing your quite frankly entirely legitimate characters, you quietly and privately tell them to go fuck themselves - in whatever polite or perhaps not so polite manner you see fit to say it.

There should be 0% tolerance for YDIW regarding factions and RP style.

Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Katrina Oniseki on 26 Mar 2013, 17:38
Thanks BB, but that isn't quite what I meant.

I was referring to IC/OOC RP politics, but I don't want to get into the OOC/IC politics of I-RED during the past 5 years because by now the outside opinions of us are so intertwined with our own choices. Action, reaction, reaction-to-reaction, etcetera.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Korsavius on 26 Mar 2013, 22:35
Ishukone? Mary Sues? Whut.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Cmdr Baxter on 26 Mar 2013, 23:29
Ishukone? Mary Sues? Whut.

I believe this is what you're looking for (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Sue). (No, not droids...)
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Lithium Flower on 27 Mar 2013, 04:37
Well, IMHO all this stuff is leading to eventually outcasting the whole corporation from the State  :ugh: Maybe even with a little military conflict like what happened between Federation and the State when Caldari left the Federation.

And, unfortunately, the more players play this outcast card, the more chances it will happen.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: ArtOfLight on 27 Mar 2013, 05:07
Perhaps I'm the oddball here (or the eternal optimist) but I don't foresee this ending badly for Ishukone, to be honest. The news made it clear that the crowd had a "hushed clap and jeers" not cheers, which is the usual crowd reaction to a Heth speech. It seems more like Heth is visibly losing support to me, which is quite realistic given the focal point of his regime is now lost.

Ishukone is staying true to form as a pioneer in humanitarian and foreign efforts. They get both ire and praise from various elements in the State and will continue to do so.

Wiyrkomi has been pretty much quiet and on the outside during most of Heth's "reign" and I suspect it has been so intentionally. Flying under the radar, so to speak.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Iwan Terpalen on 27 Mar 2013, 05:38
Once dictators get openly jeered at, they're not going to be dictators for much longer.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Korsavius on 27 Mar 2013, 05:45
Ishukone? Mary Sues? Whut.

I believe this is what you're looking for (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Sue). (No, not droids...)

Oh I know what a Mary Sue is, I just think the plausibility of Ishukone being one is just downright silly. We aren't all butterflies, unicorns, and rainbows, y'know. For example, what do you think I-RED is doing down in Syndicate? ;)

/me leaves a dark alley, quite pleased with all the [insert backroom deals here] that took place
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Lithium Flower on 27 Mar 2013, 06:12
I am a bit not sure about Mary Sue-ing Ishukone, because it acts a bit like contra mundi (from Caldari baseliner view).
Maybe it is Marysue-ish from point of view of peoples like TonyG, but when you take RP aspect and will look at them with caldari eyes, they look more like nemesis than saviors.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Alain Colcer on 27 Mar 2013, 06:31
would it be possible that Ishukone is doing all this to earn a Federation-recognized administrative license on the planet?

You know, manage it as a goverment concession and earn the profits while still maintaining caldari identity while being recognized as a non-threathening bargain inside fed space?

It would be a wise move if you ask me. Even perhaps trade intaki for caldari prime
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: BloodBird on 27 Mar 2013, 07:36
would it be possible that Ishukone is doing all this to earn a Federation-recognized administrative license on the planet?

You know, manage it as a goverment concession and earn the profits while still maintaining caldari identity while being recognized as a non-threathening bargain inside fed space?

It would be a wise move if you ask me. Even perhaps trade intaki for caldari prime

Trade Intaki for Caldari Prime? Ishukone has no authority in Intaki, they made the deal to provide the Shipping and Security service and that's the extent of it, so they can't trade anything there for Caldari Prime.

Ofc, if you mean remove Intaki from the CEWPA treaty in return for gaining Caldari Prime, that would be up to CONCORD to decide, and the Senate and Intaki Assembly to discuss first. It still would not grant Ishukone anything to say in the matter, AFAIK.

I'm a little confused, tbh.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Katrina Oniseki on 27 Mar 2013, 13:23
would it be possible that Ishukone is doing all this to earn a Federation-recognized administrative license on the planet?

You know, manage it as a goverment concession and earn the profits while still maintaining caldari identity while being recognized as a non-threathening bargain inside fed space?

It would be a wise move if you ask me. Even perhaps trade intaki for caldari prime

Trade Intaki for Caldari Prime? Ishukone has no authority in Intaki, they made the deal to provide the Shipping and Security service and that's the extent of it, so they can't trade anything there for Caldari Prime.

Ofc, if you mean remove Intaki from the CEWPA treaty in return for gaining Caldari Prime, that would be up to CONCORD to decide, and the Senate and Intaki Assembly to discuss first. It still would not grant Ishukone anything to say in the matter, AFAIK.

I'm a little confused, tbh.

I think he meant trade the shipping and security rights to Intaki back to the Federation in exchange for autonomy over Caldari Prime. The Federation wants their authority back in Intaki, and never were comfortable about Ishukone's deal. The FedNav fleet was turned away rather rudely by the Intaki Assembly, and I doubt they have forgotten that snub.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Mithfindel on 27 Mar 2013, 13:43
Funny part about the Good Guy Ishukone thing is that except TEA, Gariushi's Ishukone was anything but "real life good". Sure, they tried to save the old Crielere scientists - but then again, Gariushi personally tried to steal some BPOs. And parts of the station were probably built with slave labour, probably even bigger no-no for the Caldari than even the Gallente. So trying to save the scientists was probably some sort of honour amongst thieves. The Insorum etc. deals could probably be written off more or less as Gariushi getting old and trying to redeem past sins.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Silver Night on 27 Mar 2013, 15:49
 Scientists are also quite valuable.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Arnulf Ogunkoya on 27 Mar 2013, 16:15
Also,the whole TCMC issue comes to mind.

Ishukone may not be nice, but they are canny & they do seem to make an honest effort to look after their own people (from what I have seen & read anyway). I would agree that the Insorum thing was likely an attempt to make amends for past sins. Also, Mens Repola knows what a horrible person Heth is, because he compiled the dossier on him for Gariushi, including his Templis Dragonaurs connections. I have to say I'm amazed that they have shown up as a DUST npc corp and nobody has made any comments on a terrorist outfit that both the State & the Fed were hunting going legit.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: orange on 27 Mar 2013, 16:27
Also,the whole TCMC issue comes to mind.

...

I would agree that the Insorum thing was likely an attempt to make amends for past sins.

The other way to spin the release of the Insorum-cure is to create a larger market for TCMCs in the Empire & Kingdom.  Thus the Insorum-cure has nothing to do with amends for past sins and everything to do continuing those past sins for the betterment of the Ishukone Corporation.   :twisted:

I always frame Ishukone's actions as being what is in the best interest of Ishukone (and therefore the State), just as I frame Lai Dai's actions in that same light.  Ishukone's economic philosophy lends it to more international involvement and a willingness to engage foreigners in Win-win (or WIN-Win, perferably WIN-win) agreements.  Patriots, like KK or Lai Dai, are less interested in deals with foreigners, especially enemies, that is anything less than Win-draw.*

*I argue the Patriot investment in the Kingdom had more to do with weakening the Empire than strengthening the Kingdom.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Publius Valerius on 27 Mar 2013, 17:15
Also,the whole TCMC issue comes to mind.

...

I would agree that the Insorum thing was likely an attempt to make amends for past sins.

The other way to spin the release of the Insorum-cure is to create a larger market for TCMCs in the Empire & Kingdom.  Thus the Insorum-cure has nothing to do with amends for past sins and everything to do continuing those past sins for the betterment of the Ishukone Corporation.   :twisted:

I always frame Ishukone's actions as being what is in the best interest of Ishukone (and therefore the State), just as I frame Lai Dai's actions in that same light.  Ishukone's economic philosophy lends it to more international involvement and a willingness to engage foreigners in Win-win (or WIN-Win, perferably WIN-win) agreements.  Patriots, like KK or Lai Dai, are less interested in deals with foreigners, especially enemies, that is anything less than Win-draw.*

*I argue the Patriot investment in the Kingdom had more to do with weakening the Empire than strengthening the Kingdom.

I agree with the first part. The Ishukone was always for me also the Neoliberals (IR): Pro-businesses, pro-Trade, pro-Interdependence, pro market participation... etc....

As for the second part, I saw the Lai Dai investment in the Kingdom (Khanid Innovation), the same way as Lai Dais investment on Carthum C. To get a foot hold into the production of those more closed market (Empire and Kingdom). How they got in? Thru information-transfers (Technological change (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_change)), shaping of the thinking (in the leadership (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Ganortchar_Asabona) and company as whole), and buying of shares of those company's of course.

To make a really bad RL example: See Volkswagen investment in China (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Group_China). They have worked/most worked with companies which is already in place (pump this company up, make it competitive...etc or creat them from the ground up). Long story short, if you try to work in this market you need some sort of foothold, a joint venture or creating a company with base in the country (FAW)... etc...

Thats the way, I saw all the investment in the Kingdom earlier. As in the Kingdom arent any foreign Stations (not counting CONCORD). Which means, or can mean, that the economic in the Kingdom is more restricted. I could imagine some sort of a Mercantilism, where the central government overlooks the imports/exports, controls capital movement, and makes centralizes currency decisions and/or the currency is in the hand/realm of the central government (central bank). So in this case would be Lai Dai, Modern Finances etc.....investments in those markets a tool to get a foothold in this places. New costumers are always welcome (and I dont thing, that patriots mind costumers  :P). As why the caldari and not the others too? I could imagine, that the Caldari companies are good in taking advantage of those loopholes, as they have the people which had and still life in both worlds.

But just my 2 cents, could be also totally wrong again.


About the whole TCMC and Kingdom thingy... I had long time ago something in mind (a thread in the IGS, but could it also post here). About how it changes societies. I could imagine that the FED could even have some wire-tripping junkies (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0zaqWQiXG8) etc.... As for the Kingdom, a dealer of TCMC would it be a nice moral problem. As DEALER is the right word, you deal with an Idea/Ideas which can and will be misused. And all this for profit? Very un-Amarrian. As for the use on slaves, they make your life as holder easier, but dont help the end-goal: Reclaiming of hearts and minds....etc. I could imagine, that in the FED lifes a whole underclass with this things (TCMC); and dream the "GALLENTE DREAM OF FREEDOM AND WEALTH". As for them is okay, or lets say for the FED society is it less of a problem, because people choose to wire-trip (more or less). As for the Kingdom (the other nation next to the FED, with a underclass/slave class) which uses those things extensively is it a problem. Their are isnt much "amarrian" about those TCMC´s, the same counts for the Caldaris (As the Kingdom is more a mix of both Caldari and Amarr). So the problem is still there. But I go off topic now  :) :) :) :) :).....

Had some Ideas about this topic in mind before I left.

 
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Alain Colcer on 27 Mar 2013, 18:23
I think he meant trade the shipping and security rights to Intaki back to the Federation in exchange for autonomy over Caldari Prime. The Federation wants their authority back in Intaki, and never were comfortable about Ishukone's deal. The FedNav fleet was turned away rather rudely by the Intaki Assembly, and I doubt they have forgotten that snub.

yes precisely, thanks for clarifying.

Ishukone is just doing good business in securing access to Caldari Prime and ensuring the market there stays close to the State, even if it has to make a couple of hops into Fed space.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Mithfindel on 28 Mar 2013, 00:57
The other way to spin the release of the Insorum-cure is to create a larger market for TCMCs in the Empire & Kingdom.  Thus the Insorum-cure has nothing to do with amends for past sins and everything to do continuing those past sins for the betterment of the Ishukone Corporation.   :twisted:
Yes, the original reasoning for that project would be probably that. I was merely referring to giving the stuff away for free; this was, admittedly, not clear on the post.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: Arnulf Ogunkoya on 28 Mar 2013, 03:40
The other way to spin the release of the Insorum-cure is to create a larger market for TCMCs in the Empire & Kingdom.  Thus the Insorum-cure has nothing to do with amends for past sins and everything to do continuing those past sins for the betterment of the Ishukone Corporation.   :twisted:
Yes, the original reasoning for that project would be probably that. I was merely referring to giving the stuff away for free; this was, admittedly, not clear on the post.

Well, giving it away for free would ensure a market for TCMC's amongst holders who would otherwise use Vitoc, no? Damned cunning these Squids!

That said the passage in TEA where Garuishi makes the decision does seem to have overtones of him feeling guilty about not doing so earlier. Of course it could be argued that he was feeling remorse for not opening up the TCMC market some more, but from what I recall of the scene, this is not the case.
Title: Re: Caldari Arc
Post by: BloodBird on 30 Mar 2013, 19:14
I think he meant trade the shipping and security rights to Intaki back to the Federation in exchange for autonomy over Caldari Prime. The Federation wants their authority back in Intaki, and never were comfortable about Ishukone's deal. The FedNav fleet was turned away rather rudely by the Intaki Assembly, and I doubt they have forgotten that snub.

Perhaps not, but these pointers are important:

Ishukone went and made that deal with the Assembly, the sovereign nation in control of the Intaki system and likely the whole constellation Intaki is in. Ishukone would not have to go directly to the Federation-level management for anything at all - they could simply ask the Assembly, for the same reason I find it a little weird (and lazy from CCP's end) not to include any PF piece about the State trying to negotiate with whoever is sovereign on Caldari Prime about having the planet change hands. I think it would be cool to hear such a thing and what the terms might have been.

Even so, Ishukone can't use anything they have in Intaki on a negotiating table, their deal with the Assembly is entirely voluntary and either party can cancel it whenever they want or don't re-new when the deal expires, IIRC there was mention of how long the deal was supposed to last. The Federal-level leadership and the local nation(s) in control of Caldari Prime will decide what happens. Ishukone has no cards to play regarding Intaki, only a deal that IIRC exist only because Ishukone and their partners allow it.

Of course, I might be wrong, but I don't think it's likely.