Backstage - OOC Forums

EVE-Online RP Discussion and Resources => EVE Fiction + Fiction discussion => Topic started by: Publius Valerius on 08 Mar 2014, 07:37

Title: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 08 Mar 2014, 07:37
Hi,

I havent bought the Source book yet. So I thought maybe I open this thread to collect future feedback on this topic. What have you like, and dont like? As for me: I would love to had a grip on one of those limited edition ones, sadly I had come to late  :cry: But nevermind.

I already have a question: I dont understand is this chart:
http://www.darkhorse.com/Books/Previews/24-072?page=10

Quote
Estimated total population: 21,449,105,690,000 (29%)
Amarr: 74% 15,872,338,210,000 (74%)
Caldari: 3,860,839,024,000 (14%)
Gallente: 1,501,437,398,000 (7%)
Enslave Minmatar: 10,712,558,277,000 (14%)
Free Minmatar: 214,491,056,000 (1%)

Percentage of people actively practicing religion: 98%
Average numbers of slaves per household: 6.7

As I see it: Is the percentage towards the total population? Because the number of Free Minmatar would fit: 21,449 billion (100%) 214 billion (1%). But the percentages are a little bit of.. as the make together just 96% (74+14+7+1).

15,872,338,210,000
3,860,839,024,000
1,501,437,398,000
214,491,056,000
_____________
21,449,105,688,000

Which is almost the total free population, as 21,449,105,688,000 is close to 21,449,105,690,000. I think what happened was some rounding errors. So with the given total free population: 21,449,105,690,000

Amarr = 15,872,338,210,000 = 74%
Caldari = 3,860,839,024,000 = 18%
Gallente = 1,501,437,398,000 = 7%
Minmatar = 214,491,056,000 = 1%

So I think, it was a typo and the Caldari would/should be 18% and not 14%. As for the percentage numbers behind enslave minmatar (14%) and total population (29%) I have no plan.

What I could think of that both -- 14% and 29% --  are in percentage towards another number:
14/29 = 0,4827586206896552
10,712,558,277,000/21,449,105,690,000 = 0,4994407893656101

100% would be:
~76,518,273,407,000.14286
~73,962,433,413,000.7931

I could think that CCP maybe thought that would be the population of the known cluster? So around 73,000-76,000 billion? So that 29% of the cluster are amarr citizens/free, and 14% of the cluster are by the empire enslave minmatars?


But maybe I have overlooked something? Any help is welcome, as well as any feedback about the book; as I havent bought it yet (will do it later, maybe just a digital version, will see, Iam not sure.).


Edit: I think the 74% after Amarr was a typo, but if someone has a idea it would be great.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 08 Mar 2014, 08:26
I mailed CCP Falcon about the numbers after I saw the preview pages, a few weeks ago. They fixed them for the actual book release. The current page looks like this:

[spoiler](http://i.imgur.com/uQNWB30.jpg?1)[/spoiler]


Additionally, while it's not listed in the book, Falcon told me that 49% of people in the Empire are slaves, so the total total population (free and slave) is about 40-42 trillion, with around 20 trillion slaves, 11t of them being Minmatar.

Based on the two sets of stats, the actual total population of the Empire, both free and slaves, should be something like:

38% Free Amarr (16 trillion)
9% Free Caldari (3.8 trillion)
3% Free Gallente (1.5 trillion)
0.4% Free Minmatar (0.2 trillion)
25.6% Enslaved Minmatar (10.8 trillion)
24% Slaves of non-Matari ethnicity (9.7 trillion)

Falcon wouldn't confirm those numbers when I asked, but based on the number we have and the numbers he's given me, that seems about right.


Falcon also said that these numbers don't include the Khanid Kingdom or the Ammatar Mandate.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 08 Mar 2014, 08:32
I mailed CCP Falcon about the numbers after I saw the preview pages, a few weeks ago. They fixed them for the actual book release. The current page looks like this:

[spoiler](http://i.imgur.com/uQNWB30.jpg?1)[/spoiler]


Additionally, while it's not listed in the book, Falcon told me that 49% of people in the Empire are slaves, so that's an additional 20 trillion people to the total population, of which about half are Minmatar.

Based on the two sets of stats, the actual total population of the Empire, both free and slaves, should be something like:

38% Free Amarr (16 trillion)
9% Free Caldari (3.8 trillion)
3% Free Gallente (1.5 trillion)
0.4% Free Minmatar (0.2 trillion)
25.6% Enslaved Minmatar (10.8 trillion)
24% Slaves of non-Matari ethnicity (9.7 trillion)

Falcon wouldn't confirm those numbers when I asked, but based on the number we have and the numbers he's given me, that seems about right.


Falcon also said that these numbers don't include the Khanid Kingdom or the Ammatar Mandate.
+1
Thanks for the help  :D.... Ehm about the 29% behind the total population has he told something?

As for the rest I almost thought that why too: That it was a typo and it should be 18% for the caldari.

Edit: As I mention above... I thought 29% and 14% would be in relation to the cluster wide population. As it would fit (29+14=43%)..... with the 40%-ish of the cluster.... http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Amarr     But maybe CCP had something else in mind?

By the way: How is the book?
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 08 Mar 2014, 08:38
The 29% is in regards to total population in empire space. Free Imperials make up a full third of empire space population. When you add in slaves, the Kingdom, and the Mandate... the Imperial bloc makes up something around 60-70% of empire space population. Yowzers.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 08 Mar 2014, 08:39
The 29% is in regards to total cluster population. Free Imperials make up a full third of New Eden's overall population. When you add in slaves, the Kingdom, and the Mandate... the Imperial bloc makes up something around 60-70% of the clusterwide population. Yowzers.
+1

Thanks.... Good to know. As for Mandate and Kingdom... It would be a little much? As both are just one region nation..... ehm. Maybe something like Empire in the high 40ties.... so 46% and both smaller ones so around 7%-ish, which would give us 60%. Because the the rest of the cluster need people too :)
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 08 Mar 2014, 08:43
Slaves add another 20 trillion ish to the Empire (and the numbers already established that 21 trillion is about 29%). So just the Empire, free and slave, is 58-60% on its own. Then you add in the Kingdom and the Mandate.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 08 Mar 2014, 08:55
I don't have the book, so can't say in regards to the population presented in the book, but if we take previous given estimates...

Gallente Federation is 20% of total clusterwide population. (https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Gallente_Federation)

Minmatar in the Empire make up a third of all Minmatar everywhere, Minmatar in the Republic make up a quarter. (https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Minmatar_Republic#History) So there are ~33 trillion Minmatar total, and about 8.3 trillion in the Republic. Adding in non-Matari immigrants, that probably gets up to 9-10 trillion in the Republic. Thukker don't count, as they aren't in empire space (as the numbers are only factoring in empire space). So Republic makes up about... uh, 13% ish?

State is the smallest, and makes up everything else.


It's possible that the Kingdom and Mandate aren't counted as empire space (to clarify, I meant empire space before, not all of New Eden), and so aren't included in that total population count. That would leave around 59% Empire (29% free, 28% enslaved), 20% Federation, ~13% Republic, ~8% State.


Like I said, I don't have the book, so I can't say if these numbers are right.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 08 Mar 2014, 08:59
Slaves add another 20 trillion ish to the Empire (and the numbers already established that 21 trillion is about 29%). So just the Empire, free and slave, is 58-60% on its own. Then you add in the Kingdom and the Mandate.

Ah okay. Good to know....

Amarr Empire = 8 Regions (~35%) = ~60%
Caldari State = 4 Regions (~17%) = ~9%
Gallente Fed = 6 Regions (~26%) = ~20% (1/3 are minmatar... and almost as much as in the Rep)
Minmatar Rep = 3 Regions (~13%) = ~7%

Ammatar Mandate = 1 Region (~4%) = ~2%
Khanid Kingdom = 1 Region (~4%) = ~2%

Additionally, while it's not listed in the book, Falcon told me that 49% of people in the Empire are slaves.

Ehm..... to soften it a little.... Lets say 29%*2=57-58%-ish (because 51% free and 49 are slaves).

Amarr Empire = 8 Regions (~35%) = ~57%
Caldari State = 4 Regions (~17%) = ~10%
Gallente Fed = 6 Regions (~26%) = ~20% (1/3 are minmatar... and almost as much as in the Rep)
Minmatar Rep = 3 Regions (~13%) = ~7%

Ammatar Mandate = 1 Region (~4%) = ~3%
Khanid Kingdom = 1 Region (~4%) = ~3%

Could work..... Still a little bit much for the empire. :D Maybe the numbers are really just for the major four:

Amarr Empire = 8 Regions (~38%) = ~58%
Caldari State = 4 Regions (~19%) = ~11%
Gallente Fed = 6 Regions (~29%) = ~23% (1/3 are minmatar... and almost as much as in the Rep)
Minmatar Rep = 3 Regions (~14%) = ~8%

Yeah. I think the numbers make the most sence if we just take them as for the major fours.

Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 08 Mar 2014, 09:07
See my above post. I don't actually think Mandate and Kingdom are counted, as they may not be considered part of empire space (which is what we are counting, I was wrong to say total New Eden population earlier and have edited my post).

Also, Falcon confirmed that the State has the smallest population of the 4 empires.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: V. Gesakaarin on 08 Mar 2014, 09:11
Some of these numbers are confusing as a whole. For example the Caldari population is given:

8.4 Trillion in the State
1.5 Trillion in the Fed
3.8 Trillion in the Empire

So it's hard to tell whether there are 8.4 Trillion Caldari total in which 5.2 Trillion live abroad (64%) or if there are 13.7 Trillion Caldari total in which 5.2 Trillion live abroad (38%).

Because to me the difference in having 2/3 of Caldari not living in the State compared to 1/3 would be rather distinct, socially.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 08 Mar 2014, 09:15
It's the latter. 13.7 trillion Caldari total in the State, Federation, and Empire (there's probably some in the Republic too, so probably more than 13.7t). 5.2 trillion are abroad (in the Fed and Empire at least).
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 08 Mar 2014, 09:16
See my above post. I don't actually think Mandate and Kingdom are counted, as they may not be considered part of empire space (which is what we are counting, I was wrong to say total New Eden population earlier and have edited my post).

Also, Falcon confirmed that the State has the smallest population of the 4 empires.
Nevermind... I have edit my post to.... just not to lost my string of thoughts.... Dont see it as counter argument.  :lol: More as that Im to lazy to keep everything in mind.... So I had write it down. :lol:





Amarr Empire = 8 Regions (~38%) = ~58% * (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Amarr_Empire)Free 25% on the wiki***; in the book: 29%. But is almost the same.**
Caldari State = 4 Regions (~19%) = ~11%* (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Caldari_State)10% on the wiki.***
Gallente Fed = 6 Regions (~29%) = ~23%* (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Gallente_Federation)20% on the wiki.***
Minmatar Rep = 3 Regions (~14%) = ~8%

Yeah. I think the numbers make the most sence if we just take them as for the major fours.

***I see now... on the wiki is it towards the whole cluster population. I think it could work, as I dont think so many people life outside of the major fours.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: V. Gesakaarin on 08 Mar 2014, 09:28
It's the latter. 13.7 trillion Caldari total in the State, Federation, and Empire (there's probably some in the Republic too, so probably more than 13.7t). 5.2 trillion are abroad (in the Fed and Empire at least).

I was leaning towards that, but it's still not clarified for me.

Also, in terms of realpolitik the sheer scale of the Imperial population and its territorial size combined with its traditional foreign policies is probably enough to make every other faction in New Eden very wary about them.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 08 Mar 2014, 09:44
It's the latter. 13.7 trillion Caldari total in the State, Federation, and Empire (there's probably some in the Republic too, so probably more than 13.7t). 5.2 trillion are abroad (in the Fed and Empire at least).

I was leaning towards that, but it's still not clarified for me.

Also, in terms of realpolitik the sheer scale of the Imperial population and its territorial size combined with its traditional foreign policies is probably enough to make every other faction in New Eden very wary about them.

More weird is that I had long ago a discussion about the population of planets: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=64529&p=3

Lets see again: Free 21.449 Trillions (51%).... Slaves 20.607,862 (49%) lets round down to 20.607 Trillions (49%), which gives a total of 42.056 trillions by ~673 temperate planets. Which would give us 62,49 Billions per temperate planet.  :eek:
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: V. Gesakaarin on 08 Mar 2014, 09:52
It's the latter. 13.7 trillion Caldari total in the State, Federation, and Empire (there's probably some in the Republic too, so probably more than 13.7t). 5.2 trillion are abroad (in the Fed and Empire at least).

I was leaning towards that, but it's still not clarified for me.

Also, in terms of realpolitik the sheer scale of the Imperial population and its territorial size combined with its traditional foreign policies is probably enough to make every other faction in New Eden very wary about them.

More weird is that I had long ago a discussion about the population of planets: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=64529&p=3

Lets see again: Free 21,449 Trillions (51%).... Slaves 20,607.862 (49%) lets round down to 20,607 Trillions (49%), which gives a total of 24,056 trillions by ~673 temperate planets. Which would give us 35.744 trillions per temperate planet.  :eek:

Do you mean 35.744 Billion per temperate planet? That does seem high, but I don't think every one lives on temperate planets. Even then, I think the Gallente at least are hinted at having environmental technology that could keep a biosphere inhabited even with tens of billions of people. Then there's the fact that the technology in Eve probably allows for habitation in many ways: Massive megacities of interlinked, towering arcologies; subterranean geo-fronts; under water enclaves; stratospheric structures; orbital elevators; or low-orbit facilities.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 08 Mar 2014, 09:56
It's the latter. 13.7 trillion Caldari total in the State, Federation, and Empire (there's probably some in the Republic too, so probably more than 13.7t). 5.2 trillion are abroad (in the Fed and Empire at least).

I was leaning towards that, but it's still not clarified for me.

Also, in terms of realpolitik the sheer scale of the Imperial population and its territorial size combined with its traditional foreign policies is probably enough to make every other faction in New Eden very wary about them.

More weird is that I had long ago a discussion about the population of planets: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=64529&p=3

Lets see again: Free 21.449 Trillions (51%).... Slaves 20.607,862 (49%) lets round down to 20.607 Trillions (49%), which gives a total of 42.056 trillions by ~673 temperate planets. Which would give us 62,49 Billions per temperate planet.  :eek:

Do you mean 35.744 Billion per temperate planet? That does seem high, but I don't think every one lives on temperate planets. Even then, I think the Gallente at least are hinted at having environmental technology that could keep a biosphere inhabited even with tens of billions of people. Then there's the fact that the technology in Eve probably allows for habitation in many ways: Massive megacities of interlinked, towering arcologies; subterranean geo-fronts; under water enclaves; stratospheric structures; orbital elevators; or low-orbit facilities.

Yeah I had a typo... 24 was 42 and yes...billions. But still I think 62,49 Billions per temperate planet is alittle high (even if we take barren worlds, oceanic worlds, stations, etc into account.... you would still land around  ~20-30 billions for EVERY temperate world..). Is a bit much for me, but nevermind. Maybe the book will tell more, I heard that it mention praying by zero gravity.  :lol:  I think Torfi mention it ones by a youtube vid. :D So I dont mind the numbers, I was just curious.... So dont see it as critique.

As I mention ones on another place before, I have just get into more the space opera mood. :
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: V. Gesakaarin on 08 Mar 2014, 10:21

Yeah I had a typo... 24 was 42 and yes...billions. But still I think 62,49 Billions per temperate planet is alittle high (even if we take barren worlds, oceanic worlds, stations, etc into account.... you would still land around  ~20-30 billions for EVERY temperate world..). Is a bit much for me, but nevermind. Maybe the book will tell more, I heard that it mention praying by zero gravity.  :lol:  I think Torfi mention it ones by a youtube vid. :D So I dont mind the numbers, I was just curious.... So dont see it as critique.

As I mention ones on another place before, I have just get into more the space opera mood. :

I think it makes things interesting. I can just imagine modern Athra covered in sprawling continent sized cities of towering golden cathedral towers hundreds of metres high, full of the vibrancy and life of Imperial culture in a planetary scale urban domain.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Seriphyn on 08 Mar 2014, 13:51
I can't help but feel this is the elephant in the room, but for those who have it, could we get the Minmatar and Gallente figures too?
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 08 Mar 2014, 16:48
Also, Falcon confirmed that the State has the smallest population of the 4 empires.


Additionally, while it's not listed in the book, Falcon told me that 49% of people in the Empire are slaves.

Ehm those two things got me thinking. As the wiki mention that 40% of the cluster is the empire.[1 (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Amarr)] So I think, Falcons slave number is a little off. As I could think of that around 40% of the cluster living in the empire. Which means by given 25%[2 (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Amarr_Empire)], that around ~15% of the cluster are slaves in the empire. Which mean a 15/25 ratio, or 0.6. Which means by given 21.449 trillions, that empire has 12,869 trillion slaves.

Of those 12.869 trillion are 10.712 trillion minmatar (see source book).****
As for the Empire it would mean that it has a total of 34.318 trillions.


Now we have also have the information that the 21.449 trillions are 29% of the empire factions. Which would mean that around 73.962 trillions live in the empire factions. Now we have also the information on the wiki about the ratio towards the total population of the cluster. As mention a page before:

Amarr Empire = * (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Amarr_Empire)Free 25% on the wiki.
Caldari State =  = * (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Caldari_State)10% on the wiki.
Gallente Fed = * (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Gallente_Federation)20% on the wiki.


_____________
Adapt ratio. From cluster to empire space:
Now we just need to adapt the ration. We have already the given 29% (for the empire population) and the 25% cluster population of the Amarr Empire, which gives us a ratio of: 29/25=1.16 Now we can take this ratio and use it on the other two empire which we have numbers for. Caldari State= 10*1.16=11.6 ~11.6%. Gallente Fed= 20*1.16=23.2 ~23.2%.

So now we have almost all. Let us just add for given 73.962 trillions:
Amarr Empire = 29% + 17.4% = 46.4% = 12.869 trillion + 10.712 trillion = 34.318 trillions
Caldari State = 11.6% = 8.579592 trillions
Gallente Federation = 23.2% = 17.159184 trillions
Which gives us a total of 60,056776 for the cluster without the "rest"/"others". Which means 73.962-60.056776 would us give the "rest"/"others" population = 13,905224 =Republic, Mandate, Kingdom, InterBus, CONCORD.


_____________
Minmatar population:

(1) Now we also know that 1/3 of the Gallente Fed are Minmatar,* (http://community.eveonline.com/backstory/races/gallente/government/) which are 1/5 of the total minmatar.* (http://community.eveonline.com/backstory/races/minmatar/) Fed population/3=17.159184/3 = 5.719728. Which would give us a total of 5.719728*5 = 28.59864 minmatars.

(2) Second way would be to take the free and enlave numbers of the source book and add them together; as the empire as 1/3 of the minmatar population. (214.491 billion + 10.712 trillion)*3 = 10.926491=32.779473

So we can say that in the cluster has around ~30 trillions minmatar. In between 28.599 trillions and 32.779 trillions.

1/4 of this 30 trillions life in the Republic. Which means ~7.5 trillions. Which puts the Republic below the State. As the wiki also mention, that the State is "second least populous entity out of the four major empires".* (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Caldari_State) So I think Falcon was wrong. I guess the State has around 8.6 trillions and the Republic so 7.5 trillions.


_____________
Other Factions:

If we now go back to the other factions. We can guess how many live in their as well. By given  "rest" population of 13.905224. 13.905224 - 7.5 trillions = 6.405224. I would guess that the major junk, are Mandate and Kingdom, as the InterBus and CONCORD are just organizations (I dont know if you can be even "legal" InterBus citizen or CONCORD.). I would guess that the Mandate is maybe a little bigger as the Kingdom (as it has more space). So my guess out of thin air: Mandate = 3.305224 trillions and the Kingdom 3.1 trillions.


_____________
off topic. Just for the beauty of numbers  :P ....the system numbers.
As for systems we have 1907 Empire systems:

Amarr=702 (36.8%)
Ammatar Mandate=118 (6.2%)
Caldari=326 (17.1%)
CONCORD=8 (0.4%)
Gallente=388 (20.3%)
InterBus=1 (0.1%)
Khanid Kingdom=84 (4.4%)
Minmatar=280 (14.9%)



_____________
_____________
Summerary:

Amarr = 702 systems (36.8%) = 34.318 (46.4%) = 48.886 population per system
Ammatar Mandate =118 systems (6.2%) = 3.305224 (4.5%) = 28.010 population per system
Caldari = 326 systems (17.1%) = 8.579592 (11.6%) = 26.318 population per system
CONCORD = 8 systems (0.4%) = (0%) = 0 population per system
Gallente = 388 systems (20.3%) = 17.159184 (23.2%) = 44.228 population per system
InterBus = 1 (0.1%) = (0%) = 0 population per system
Khanid Kingdom = 84 systems (4.4%) = 3.1 (4.2%) = 36.904 population per system
Minmatar = 280 systems (14.9%) = 7.5 (10,1%) = 26.786 population per system
_____________
Total:
1907 systems, 73.962 trillions, 38.784 population per system (in billions)





_____________
Edit: ****The Empire has 12.869 trillion slaves and 10.712 trillion are minmatar slaves. Which would mean that 83.2% of the slave would be minmatar. On the wiki is it 50-75%[* (https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Slavery#Demographics)]. This is a problwm which can be easly fix. We have the total of ~30 trillions minmatar. Now let us get back again. 30/3=10 trillions minmatar which live in the empire, minus the free would make 9,785509 trillions. Which would be then 76.03%. Way closer to the wiki, if we enlarge the number of free minmatar the slave number would drop even further.

Edit 2: We can even guess the population of the whole cluster. By given 73.962 trillions * the ratio of empire to cluster = 73.962 * 1.16 = 85.795,92 trillions. Which would mean that 11.833,92 trillions would live outside of the empire space. A reasonable number, If we think about it. Then 0.0 is for most people nothing more as Haiti or Somalia in our world. A world in chaos (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iTg20x7w2s), which has a fast secession of states and/or governments. And the Youtube: Eve-Online Influence Map 2007 to 2013 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lehjuIw9Zs) shows the latter point brilliantly, every come and go of a color is more or less a failed state.

Edit 3: Added population per system.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 08 Mar 2014, 17:02
I think 34.318 (46.4% of the empire factions) is a more reasonable number. I just think Falcon has mix up some stuff.


__________
Population per planet:
As for systems we have 1907 Empire systems and the Amarr Empire has 702. Which gives us 36.8% or 0,3681174619821709


As for the planets:
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Planet#Distribution_of_planet_types

Planet (Temperate) 1115+714 = 1829
Planet (Oceanic) 423+320 = 743
Planet (Barren) 2920+2044 = 4964

Which gives us for the Amarr Empire:
Planet (Temperate) 1829*0,3681174619821709 = 673,2868379653906
Planet (Oceanic) 743*0,3681174619821709 = 273,511274252753
Planet (Barren) 4964*0,3681174619821709 = 1827,335081279496

So the Empire as around 2774 planets.... Which means by given 34.318 trillion:
11.289,834 billions per planets.


So V. Gesakaarin was right... It doesnt look so big. As for me I never thought that New Eden has so many barren worlds. 2,7 times as much as temperate.... :eek:  That was one of my errors before.




Yeah I had a typo... 24 was 42 and yes...billions. But still I think 62,49 Billions per temperate planet is alittle high (even if we take barren worlds, oceanic worlds, stations, etc into account.... you would still land around  ~20-30 billions for EVERY temperate world..). Is a bit much for me, but nevermind. Maybe the book will tell more, I heard that it mention praying by zero gravity.  :lol:  I think Torfi mention it ones by a youtube vid. :D So I dont mind the numbers, I was just curious.... So dont see it as critique.

As I mention ones on another place before, I have just get into more the space opera mood. :

I think it makes things interesting. I can just imagine modern Athra covered in sprawling continent sized cities of towering golden cathedral towers hundreds of metres high, full of the vibrancy and life of Imperial culture in a planetary scale urban domain.
Yeah.  :D As well as the underwater cities.... In the "day of darkness II" vid  had they made one.... Just beautiful. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGJHjKUvHlk
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Jace on 10 Mar 2014, 09:09
Woot, mine finally came today. Queue rageposts in 10...9...8...
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 10 Mar 2014, 09:34
Woot, mine finally came today. Queue rageposts in 10...9...8...

My will come around the 28 march. I had just order yesterday.  :(


How is it? I mean the art work looked great. As well as I have to agree, on one post in the other threat, that the preview show that 90% are more or less the same. So maybe you can give us some spoilers.  :D  I dont mind some spoilers. Things you liked and and stuff what you dont liked?
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Jace on 10 Mar 2014, 09:38
Woot, mine finally came today. Queue rageposts in 10...9...8...

My will come around the 28 march. I had just order yesterday.  :(


How is it? I mean the art work looked great. As well as I have to agree, on one post in the other threat, that the preview show that 90% are more or less the same. So maybe you can give us some spoilers.  :D  I dont mind some spoilers. Things you liked and and stuff what you dont liked?

Currently reading bits and pieces when I take a break from schoolwork. I'll sit down and read it cover to cover tonight and give my initial thoughts - since this is me, most of them will probably be Caldari-related. My favorite part so far is the introduction where it clearly states that Source is a depiction of the "world as it is". Backs up Falcon's comments about Source being the definitive PF. Regardless of whether things in it upset people, it will be useful to have a definitive PF source.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: PracticalTechnicality on 10 Mar 2014, 10:58
I will be doing likewise tonight, Jace.  It will be interesting to see where we are similar or different in our opinions on specific topics. 
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Jace on 10 Mar 2014, 21:20
I'm not going to have time to read everything tonight like I had planned, but I will definitely post my Caldari thoughts when I have the time. I've already noticed some significant emphasis and possible retcons.

Edit: First Thought: They are not backing away from the neofascist feel. It is looking unlikely that it can be as attributed to Heth as some are wont to do. That'll be all I have until I finish some papers.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 11 Mar 2014, 13:08
Woot, mine finally came today. Queue rageposts in 10...9...8...

My will come around the 28 march. I had just order yesterday.  :(


How is it? I mean the art work looked great. As well as I have to agree, on one post in the other threat, that the preview show that 90% are more or less the same. So maybe you can give us some spoilers.  :D  I dont mind some spoilers. Things you liked and and stuff what you dont liked?

Currently reading bits and pieces when I take a break from schoolwork. I'll sit down and read it cover to cover tonight and give my initial thoughts - since this is me, most of them will probably be Caldari-related. My favorite part so far is the introduction where it clearly states that Source is a depiction of the "world as it is". Backs up Falcon's comments about Source being the definitive PF. Regardless of whether things in it upset people, it will be useful to have a definitive PF source.
I have no problem with Caldari-related topics. As former Kingdom RPler I saw myself with one foot in the Empire and one in the State. So I dont mind if you focus on them.....

I will be doing likewise tonight, Jace.  It will be interesting to see where we are similar or different in our opinions on specific topics.
Would be great to hear... So dont let me wait :)

By the way it would be great if there is a Kingdom page; and if there is "new" stuff, if you people could give a feedback. As I said I dont mind spoilers. :D

I can't help but feel this is the elephant in the room, but for those who have it, could we get the Minmatar and Gallente figures too?
You mean with "elephant in the room", that the Empire is so large and/or has a large average planet population? Yeah, I thought this too. But you know space magic. :P

I'm not going to have time to read everything tonight like I had planned, but I will definitely post my Caldari thoughts when I have the time. I've already noticed some significant emphasis and possible retcons.

Edit: First Thought: They are not backing away from the neofascist feel. It is looking unlikely that it can be as attributed to Heth as some are wont to do. That'll be all I have until I finish some papers.

As for me, I dont mind Neo-Fascist, even if I have no clue what this is.:(

I had in the short time I was back a great discussion with guy in the OOC chat ingame. More or less about this topic: Hypers-stylize version of things we know vs. realism. I think in the end he was right. I think all factions will be more a ultra-hyper-stylize/fantasy version of something in this world (Which of course could never exist.) In other words: State = ultra-hyper-stylize/fantasy version of an corporate America/andorJapan/andorFinnland/andorGermany.

Let me explain what I mean with it. If you look in the internet... most of all on youtube. You will find most of the time bad real world comparison. Good example is [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK0gF17RVio]here[/url]. So if CCP had choose to hyper-stylize factions, I havent a problem with, because it make those factions easier accessible for a wider audience. Sometimes you have to dumb down things. This was one of the major critique points I got from him about my Kingdom stuff (http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=5697.0). And I think he was right. The error was me and my style, thats the reason I got almost none feedback in the OOC channel when I asked.

Here I have to say... It isnt about if the State is the hypers-stylize/fantasy version of an corporate America.*** It is more about that the State is a hypers-stylize/fantasy version of something WE KNOW. This is a point which gets interest, feedback, and toyed around; not the boring shit I write. The sad things is people like the SAME shit just in different flavors. McDonald and Burger King, the same shit just different flavor. And I think this will be the case with all the stuff. Example: Empire will be a hypers-stylize/fantasy version of an confederate America*** The Fed a bad hypers-stylize/fantasy version of an "liberal-supranational-NAFTA-EU-ish" America*** (where the member states (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Government_of_the_Gallente_Federation#Members) are US, Canada, Bahmas etc... and the colonies (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Government_of_the_Gallente_Federation#Colonies) are Puerto Rico, Virgins, Bermudas, etc...)... And I have here say again... This isnt because of 1/3 of the players are from north America. It is because PEOPLE LIKE SHIT WHAT THEY KNOW, everywhere in the world (every nation, race, gender, etc...). It is like I said just the same with slightly different flavor. So I dont mind CCP doing this, as I think it will bring more people into our table. As hypers-stylize/fantasy version of something WE KNOW is more interesting (as for example my shit).

Quote
As I mention here (http://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1247411#post1247411): "By the way: Those anyone know when the immersion projects comes ingame? I mean it would be a nice and easy addition and would make our little round table (Publius waves to all earlier comments in this thread) bigger."

As I mention in the quote above, I welcome stuff which makes our roundtable bigger. So I dont mind CCP going this way. As the major part of the entertainment industry is ALREADY there: Aka. Revamping old stuff (stuff what WE KNOW) and make it more accessible for a wider audience. Thats is one of the reason we see so many re-bots, squeals, prequels, etc... As they have a high name recognition, therefore is more less SHIT WHAT WE KNOW OR EVEN SAW and they need just to revamp/stylize/fantasy it in a way so that it does not loss this connection. This is the key today for making a butt-load of money (and laugh all the way to the bank). :D

I know it sounds more negative, then positive, but in the end: The needs justifies those choices. As the CCP lore/live event team needs resources (money, man power). And the old evelopedia project was a fail, as well as my pages; as it in true spark almost no interest or feedback after a week or so. Aka. sparked no money. So as I said: I know it sounds more negative, then positive. But it is truelly meant positive. As I hope it will help CCP and the RP community in the end.

Now to some feedback... :D


___________

***Which hasnt exist, Which could not exist, and Will most likely never exist. As well as you can easily change the nation/race/gender/what ever/I dont care :D....
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Shiki on 11 Mar 2014, 17:29
Mine arrived, cat is already marking it as hers though.  :(

A lot of the planetside concept artworks have me hrrnng-ing. Might scan some stuff for signatures.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Jace on 12 Mar 2014, 00:11
*snip*

You'll be excited. They totally changed the name of Caille.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Vieve on 12 Mar 2014, 12:52
*snip*

You'll be excited. They totally changed the name of Caille.


And rouge drones are now not only canon, but an important part of the FIO's intelligence gathering network.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Shiki on 12 Mar 2014, 13:57
Mods gonna mod.  :s
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Havohej on 12 Mar 2014, 14:08
Mods gonna mod.  :s
[admin]Yup.  Temp lock for moderation.
EDIT: Topic re-opened.  Participants are encouraged to review Rule 5 regarding respect of US law (as the board is hosted by a US-based company on a machine located on US soil).  This includes US copyright law.[/admin]
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 12 Mar 2014, 14:33
Mods gonna mod.  :s
Yup.  Temp lock for moderation.
EDIT: Topic re-opened.  Participants are encouraged to review Rule 5 regarding respect of US law (as the board is hosted by a US-based company on a machine located on US soil).  This includes US copyright law.

Stupid question: Why you havent just snip my post, but instated deleted it? As the part where I ask Seriphyn about his project is gone, as well as I say people dont by shy. And I have to write it again. So sad. Nevermid, so I do it again. ;)

So again:
- People dont be shy. Give some feedback: What you like, what you dont like?
- How is the Elusenia-project (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Elusenia) going? Do you need a ambassador?

Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Muck Raker on 12 Mar 2014, 15:34
When my copy of Eve Sauce arrives, I shall be examining it carefully, and should I find anything particularly objectionable, then in the tradition of Confessions of an Empress's Love Slave (https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=623418#post623418), I shall report those objectionable facts as being True™ on the IGS.


[spoiler]True™ is a trademark of Gutter Press Media Corporation. Dramatisation may not have happened.[/spoiler]
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 26 Mar 2014, 16:33
So, I finally got Source, so going to check to see how close my predictions were.

I don't have the book, so can't say in regards to the population presented in the book, but if we take previous given estimates...

Gallente Federation is 20% of total clusterwide population. (https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Gallente_Federation)

Minmatar in the Empire make up a third of all Minmatar everywhere, Minmatar in the Republic make up a quarter. (https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Minmatar_Republic#History) So there are ~33 trillion Minmatar total, and about 8.3 trillion in the Republic. Adding in non-Matari immigrants, that probably gets up to 9-10 trillion in the Republic. Thukker don't count, as they aren't in empire space (as the numbers are only factoring in empire space). So Republic makes up about... uh, 13% ish?

State is the smallest, and makes up everything else.


It's possible that the Kingdom and Mandate aren't counted as empire space (to clarify, I meant empire space before, not all of New Eden), and so aren't included in that total population count. That would leave around 59% Empire (29% free, 28% enslaved), 20% Federation, ~13% Republic, ~8% State.


Like I said, I don't have the book, so I can't say if these numbers are right.

From Source:

29% Empire (21.4 trillion, free only)
27% Federation (20 trillion)
14% Republic (9.6 trillion.)
11% (8.4 trillion)

=81% of Empire space population.

I guestimated 9-10 trillion in the Republic, was spot on. But my 8.3 trillion Minmatar in the Republic guess was off, there are actually less at 6.5 trillion.

It is unclear what the remaining 19% of people are. It's definitely not the full Amarr slave population (as that would push the number over 100%). It's possible that the total number is intended to include Minmatar slaves (but not the other slaves), since the original version of the Amarr demographics did give a percentage-of-Empire-space-population value to Minmatar slaves (but not other slaves). Though that only gets us to 95% and so would still leave an unidentified 5%.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nauplius on 26 Mar 2014, 17:09
What if the total slave population could fit in?

On page 042 it says the slave population is "mostly drawn from people of Minmatar extraction".  That would mean an upper bound for the non-Minmatar slave population of 10.712 Trillion (any more and "most" of the slaves would be non-Minmatar).

On the other hand, on page 126 it says the Amarr Empire relies on labor "from an enormous stock of slaves numbering in the dozens of trillions".  That is inconsistent with a mostly-Minmatar slave population, which has an upper population bound of 21.4 Trillion.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 26 Mar 2014, 18:36
It doesn't, since we have hard numbers for it (they just weren't put in the book for whatever silly reason).

Quote
The actual figure for percentage of enslaved people in the Empire is 49% of the total population.

-CCP Falcon

From when I asked him about the population numbers. 49% of the total population, with a total free population of 21.4 trillion, leads to 20.6 trillion slaves, of which 51% of the slaves are Minmatar (at 10.7 trillion).

That number is consistent with the value previously given in EVElopedia.

Quote
While exact numbers are difficult to come by, because of the sheer number of slaves, it is estimated that between 50% and 75% of the Empire's current slave stock are Minmatar. All of these slaves come from lines that have been enslaved for less than 9 generations.

- Slavery (https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Slavery#Demographics)


So at 20.6 trillion, that definitely goes over 100% based on the numbers we have. 59 trillion is 81%, which makes 73.3 trillion the 100%. 73.3 minus 59 trillion is 14 trillion, which is much less than the total slave count and 4 trillion more than the 'just Minmatar slaves' count. So there's an unidentified number no matter what way you go.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 26 Mar 2014, 18:46
So I'm thinking about just ignoring the 'total Empire space population percentage' and going on the raw population numbers. Less complicated than trying to figure out what they were intending.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Elmund Egivand on 26 Mar 2014, 21:11
I'm not particularly pleased about the Minmatar section, especially the short story part. Why of all things must it be about slavery instead of about an emancipated slave trying to get his bearings in the new Tribal order?

Also not enough Minmatar art.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 26 Mar 2014, 21:36
Agreed. I don't think the Minmatar chapter is necessarily bad, so much as it didn't go into what it should have. They wrote a chapter about the Minmatar, rather than the Minmatar Republic, and so they wasted too much page space on describing Minmatar activities outside the Republic.

And yeah, the short story being about a slave was the wrong way to go. It should have been about someone living in the Republic.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Elmund Egivand on 27 Mar 2014, 00:31
The other thing I do not quite like about the book is the Amarr chapter, which seems to make it a point to bring up slavery over and over and over again. Also, the Amarr faith system isn't discussed in much details. Whole chunks about governance and politics, another whole chunks about slavery, nothing but references to The Scriptures, some snippets on what The Scriptures are and another huge chunk about slavery with smaller chunks interspersed into other chunks.

On the other hand, I felt that the Gallente chapter was relatively well written. It discusses alot about their democratic systems, and the times democracy failed, the different players of the Federation and exploring the multiple angles of the Federation, from the left to the right, from the Jin-Mei's caste system to the once-primitive Manarr slave-taking ways, from wealthy to destitute and that little thing about the Gallente smug cultural superiority and passive indoctrination of the Gallente way. The short story portion itself is also pretty well written, showing very well what the character thinks of his position, and of others and his naivete when dealing with the Civire musician.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Esna Pitoojee on 27 Mar 2014, 13:13
The other thing I do not quite like about the book is the Amarr chapter, which seems to make it a point to bring up slavery over and over and over again. Also, the Amarr faith system isn't discussed in much details. Whole chunks about governance and politics, another whole chunks about slavery, nothing but references to The Scriptures, some snippets on what The Scriptures are and another huge chunk about slavery with smaller chunks interspersed into other chunks.

On the other hand, I felt that the Gallente chapter was relatively well written. It discusses alot about their democratic systems, and the times democracy failed, the different players of the Federation and exploring the multiple angles of the Federation, from the left to the right, from the Jin-Mei's caste system to the once-primitive Manarr slave-taking ways, from wealthy to destitute and that little thing about the Gallente smug cultural superiority and passive indoctrination of the Gallente way. The short story portion itself is also pretty well written, showing very well what the character thinks of his position, and of others and his naivete when dealing with the Civire musician.

This was my major disappointment with the Amarr chapter as well. Compared to the fairly nuanced Gallente chapter, the Amarr felt like it was saying "so, they're racist imperialist slavers, and everything else is secondary." Compared to the relatively complex stuff we've picked up over the years, this felt like a huge step back in the portrayal of the Amarr.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 27 Mar 2014, 13:32
I didn't see anything out of place with the stuff I've already read, save the one thing Nico pointed out in the other thread. I was especially glad to see it firmly stated that the 'True Amarr are the Chosen by culture and Scripture', as it's always been the case but was largely left out of the recent EVElopedia articles despite the fact being such an essential part of the culture.

They do go into slaves-should-not-be-treated-overly-poorly, but that's primarily detailed in the Amarr and Minmatar short stories rather than the Amarr chapter text (which mostly just repeats and summarizes everything on EVElopedia already).

I would have liked to see more on the religious rituals and daily culture in the Amarr chapter, and the Minmatar chapter. The Amarr short story did give us some stuff in that regard, at least.

I think the thing I dislike the most is the requirement of capsuleers being super physically fit. DUSTies are the physical ones, we're supposed to be the brains-in-machines.


Overall, I think the big problem with Source was really that it was trying to do too much in one book. I'd really like to see individual source books for each empire, rather than trying to scrunch everything into one book. Page space requirements heavily limit how much detail is available. Caldari for example get a ton of cultural stuff because they have only a page of history. Amarr have very little because so much of their pages are reserved for the history. Minmatar have less info about Republic culture because having so many tribes and Minmatar outside the Republic necessitated a lot of space on that.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Esna Pitoojee on 27 Mar 2014, 14:53
Oh, I agree that it didn't put in a whole lot of new material. My issue is that if someone reads just Source, they would come to the conclusion that all there is to Amarr at all is just racism, imperialism, and slavery; this is not at all accurate. Not every Amarr is a bigoted, isolationist slaveholder... but if I didn't already know my lore pretty heavily, I'd not get that picture from Source.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Jace on 27 Mar 2014, 14:55
Oh, I agree that it didn't put in a whole lot of new material. My issue is that if someone reads just Source, they would come to the conclusion that all there is to Amarr at all is just racism, imperialism, and slavery; this is not at all accurate. Not every Amarr is a bigoted, isolationist slaveholder... but if I didn't already know my lore pretty heavily, I'd not get that picture from Source.

I agree, though there is a lot of other PF that a cursory glance gives that impression.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 27 Mar 2014, 14:57
Oh, I agree that it didn't put in a whole lot of new material. My issue is that if someone reads just Source, they would come to the conclusion that all there is to Amarr at all is just racism, imperialism, and slavery; this is not at all accurate. Not every Amarr is a bigoted, isolationist slaveholder... but if I didn't already know my lore pretty heavily, I'd not get that picture from Source.

Yeah. Like I said, the big problem is they tried to do too much in one book. It works as a core book, but ideally there should be separate books for each of the factions that goes into intricate detail of all their facets.

Maybe if Source was successful enough, we might see that. But I doubt it.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 27 Mar 2014, 17:10
I was especially glad to see it firmly stated that the 'True Amarr are the Chosen by culture and Scripture', as it's always been the case but was largely left out of the recent EVElopedia articles despite the fact being such an essential part of the culture.

I'd beg to differ: While it's true that the Amarr were always portrayed as being ethnocentric to the degree of culturally established view True Amarr as superior by race, there has been a lot of nuance in that showing how there were degrees in that between Sabik sects that believed that Amarr were born with spores on their heels and everyone else with saddles on their back, while Amarr orthodoxy was theologically more a sophisticated ethnocentrism, which found it's expression in the folklore simplified to racism.

Scripture - as far as the snippets we have go - never really pointed at a racist teaching of True Amarr superiority either, rather it was giving quite some room of interpretation from an ethocentrism of Amarr as choosen people up to a more ethiccentered view of stressing righteous life in fear of God as the important part.

EVE: Source dumbed that down to a teaching of racial superiority that is supposedly culturally as well as Scripturally anchored and which conflicts actually with a lot of what has been established about the Sabik vs Amarr Orthodoxy distinction. It is taking dimensionality out of the Amarr culture and reduces the shades of grey for the dubious gain of 'clarity'.

To me, that is a bad move, though I see how people who were interpreting PF so far as Amarr being simply racist feel vindicated by it.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 27 Mar 2014, 17:17
I didn't see anything out of place with the stuff I've already read, save the one thing Nico pointed out in the other thread. I was especially glad to see it firmly stated that the 'True Amarr are the Chosen by culture and Scripture', as it's always been the case but was largely left out of the recent EVElopedia articles despite the fact being such an essential part of the culture.

They do go into slaves-should-not-be-treated-overly-poorly, but that's primarily detailed in the Amarr and Minmatar short stories rather than the Amarr chapter text (which mostly just repeats and summarizes everything on EVElopedia already).

I would have liked to see more on the religious rituals and daily culture in the Amarr chapter, and the Minmatar chapter. The Amarr short story did give us some stuff in that regard, at least.

I think the thing I dislike the most is the requirement of capsuleers being super physically fit. DUSTies are the physical ones, we're supposed to be the brains-in-machines.


Overall, I think the big problem with Source was really that it was trying to do too much in one book. I'd really like to see individual source books for each empire, rather than trying to scrunch everything into one book. Page space requirements heavily limit how much detail is available. Caldari for example get a ton of cultural stuff because they have only a page of history. Amarr have very little because so much of their pages are reserved for the history. Minmatar have less info about Republic culture because having so many tribes and Minmatar outside the Republic necessitated a lot of space on that.

I overall agree. I think also more then one book would be better. Maybe, a general book (the universe, cloning, pods, dust, etc...), and a second one about all the factions would be great. :D As for the "racism part on the Amarr", as mention on another thread; I just need to rethink my char and make some adjustments towards, that actually racism is the paradigm (and not religion).


New Vid is out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jthyWHPmTCs




I was especially glad to see it firmly stated that the 'True Amarr are the Chosen by culture and Scripture', as it's always been the case but was largely left out of the recent EVElopedia articles despite the fact being such an essential part of the culture.

I'd beg to differ: While it's true that the Amarr were always portrayed as being ethnocentric to the degree of culturally established view True Amarr as superior by race, there has been a lot of nuance in that showing how there were degrees in that between Sabik sects that believed that Amarr were born with spores on their heels and everyone else with saddles on their back, while Amarr orthodoxy was theologically more a sophisticated ethnocentrism, which found it's expression in the folklore simplified to racism.

Scripture - as far as the snippets we have go - never really pointed at a racist teaching of True Amarr superiority either, rather it was giving quite some room of interpretation from an ethocentrism of Amarr as choosen people up to a more ethiccentered view of stressing righteous life in fear of God as the important part.

EVE: Source dumbed that down to a teaching of racial superiority that is supposedly culturally as well as Scripturally anchored and which conflicts actually with a lot of what has been established about the Sabik vs Amarr Orthodoxy distinction. It is taking dimensionality out of the Amarr culture and reduces the shades of grey for the dubious gain of 'clarity'.

To me, that is a bad move, though I see how people who were interpreting PF so far as Amarr being simply racist feel vindicated by it.

I agree, but the source tells otherwise. And truth be told, most people want it that way so the majority has spoken (sometimes we as opposition has to face reality). I could make 100 threads and explain why racism as primer wouldnt really work, and that it was a bad idea from TonyG to set a paradigm about a faction (instate of having people speak. Example I had racist individuals in my latest wiki page, but without setting a "gallente are racist" paradigm. Even if many people in the "OOC channel" would see me to go further.) True be told, most people want to play their amarr char with a racist paradigm aka as "southern slaver" (I could send as example some old hate-mails*** I got because of some stuff I wrote in the pedia  :D How I would destroy RP and the Amarr etc....). The latter "movement" comes out of mix: "Dude, I dont want to think or read" plus the love to a "hypersytilze version of something we know".


*** The best mails were those which actually "try" to be nice  :D... And I say "try" as it actually was more or less: "Meh. I like your stuff, but actually yeah bro, I could do better." Of course just in a longer version and without giving any valid input or a critique which I could work in. Truthfully more or less a mail; that Im okay, but they are awesome and I should know that.... :D

_________

But back to the topic. What do people think that the State has the least population, but the second biggest navy (http://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3222074#post3222074)?
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 27 Mar 2014, 18:32
I was especially glad to see it firmly stated that the 'True Amarr are the Chosen by culture and Scripture', as it's always been the case but was largely left out of the recent EVElopedia articles despite the fact being such an essential part of the culture.

I'd beg to differ: While it's true that the Amarr were always portrayed as being ethnocentric to the degree of culturally established view True Amarr as superior by race, there has been a lot of nuance in that showing how there were degrees in that between Sabik sects that believed that Amarr were born with spores on their heels and everyone else with saddles on their back, while Amarr orthodoxy was theologically more a sophisticated ethnocentrism, which found it's expression in the folklore simplified to racism.

Scripture - as far as the snippets we have go - never really pointed at a racist teaching of True Amarr superiority either, rather it was giving quite some room of interpretation from an ethocentrism of Amarr as choosen people up to a more ethiccentered view of stressing righteous life in fear of God as the important part.

EVE: Source dumbed that down to a teaching of racial superiority that is supposedly culturally as well as Scripturally anchored and which conflicts actually with a lot of what has been established about the Sabik vs Amarr Orthodoxy distinction. It is taking dimensionality out of the Amarr culture and reduces the shades of grey for the dubious gain of 'clarity'.

To me, that is a bad move, though I see how people who were interpreting PF so far as Amarr being simply racist feel vindicated by it.

It's always been there. Source just spells it out.

[spoiler]
Quote
While the champion himself must be of pure Amarrian descent, his wingmen are said to be allowed to be of any race and bloodline.

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=171&tid=4&_ga=1.39545891.1867853888.1395525975

Quote
The arrest is said to come after the journalist interrupted a scripted press event with questions regarding a debated decision by the Amarr Imperial Succession Committee of allowing pilots of other races than Amarr to assist the "pure blooded" Amarrian champions in their upcoming combat duels.

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=174&tid=4&_ga=1.7881650.1867853888.1395525975

Quote
Uriam Kador, head of the Kador family, has intensified the ongoing debate surrounding Catiz Tash-Murkon's acquisition of the Tal-Romon Cathedral on Eclipticum by questioning the heir status of the Tash-Murkon family. The Tash-Murkons replaced the Khanid family when the latter broke from the Empire following Heideran's election as emperor. The nomination came as a surprise to most, not the least because the Tash-Murkons were Udorians, and thus not of pure Amarrian ancestry.

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=369&tid=4&_ga=1.62139564.1867853888.1395525975

Quote
"We should look to true Amarrians, the chosen people of God, barren of the impurities of their spacebound kin."

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=1404&tid=4&_ga=1.73033619.1867853888.1395525975

Quote
"House Sarum feels that the past open doors policy of ascension was patently ridiculous. We cannot and should not allow anyone but true Amarrians to decide the future of our glorious empire. It's no wonder that the last two chosen Emperors were such weaklings?"

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=1409&tid=4&_ga=1.73033619.1867853888.1395525975

Quote
"While we acknowledge and respect the views of the other Royal Houses, [the Tash-Murkon] Royal House is strongly against the racial implications of allowing only True Amarr to decide the next championship.

The Empire was forged in our collective blood. We worship the one and only Lord God. It is by all our strengths that the Empire was made great, and it will be by all our strengths that it shall continue."

With the only Royal House yet to make its views known on the subject the Amarr News Service managed to arrange a short sitting with Yonis Ardishapur himself shortly after a meeting with Chamberlain Karsoth.

"The Lord God saw fit to create only one race of his Chosen. We are that race. While the lesser races follow God's word faithfully and loyally, as well they should, and while they have their place within the Empire, it is not for them to rise above their station. Decisions of this importance should be left to God's true Chosen, and none other."

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=1425&tid=4&_ga=1.229778204.1867853888.1395525975

Quote
The majority of the criticism comes from Tanar's outspoken views on the purity of Amarrian heritage and the inferiority of those of non-pure Amarrian blood.

Tanar has been the center of criticism before, most recently three years ago when he gave a lecture entitled "Scriptural Evidence Supporting the Continuing Servitude of Udorians, Ealurians, Khanid, Ni-Kunni, and Minmatar." The lecture advocated a stripping of title and privilege from all citizens of the Empire who were not of pure True Amarrian ancestry, including reducing the royal Tash-Murkon Family to the status of commoners. The backlash generated by Udorian, Khanid, and liberal Amarrian Holders, in addition to threats of funding withdrawal from numerous wealthy non-True Amarrian merchants, resulted in Tanar receiving a year's suspension with pay from the Institute.

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=2582&tid=2&_ga=1.236668801.1867853888.1395525975

Quote
"My word lies within all,
All it requires is the breath of faith,
To ignite the fire,
So the lost can find their way,
So the fallen can rise,
To take their place as my chosen,
For you are all my creation,
And are all equal in my kingdom."
-The Apocryphon

"These texts are considered heretical by the Amarr clergy and anyone found preaching or distributing them is persecuted relentlessly."

https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/The_Apocryphon
[/spoiler]

What splits Amarr from Sabik is that with the Amarr only the True Amarr are Chosen (with the exception of the big controversy to claim that Khameiras are also Chosen), while in the Sabik faith anyone can theoretically become Chosen ("Savant"). That anyone can become Chosen by faith in God is the one piece of Sabik Scripture we have, and this is a Scripture that is deemed heretical by orthodox Amarrian faith. Sure, there's no orthodox Scripture we have that outright says 'only the True Amarr are Chosen', so there is a bit of leeway on player interpretation, but when there is a Scripture that says "anyone can become Chosen by being faithful" and that this Scripture is deemed heretical, that says quite a lot to me.

Source doesn't stop characters from having the other interpretation ICly and arguing for that view, because at least from the Scriptures we have available it is possible to argue for that interpretation ICly. All that Source does is just reinforces canon that has already been there that the traditional belief is that only the True Amarr are God's Chosen, thus confirming that other interpretations are an atypical belief (which can be considered either simply liberal or heretical depending on character viewpoints).
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Vincent Pryce on 27 Mar 2014, 18:34
They always had the most advanced, which did make sense and it was also their trump card why people didn't fuck with them... But now second largest too with the least amount of people? I am not gonna even bother taking EVE fiction revamps seriously anymore :lol:

Super Special State Sentai Princess Brigade, ho!

(http://gooby.naurunappula.com/org/36/17/36174171bfd01d7e/0/1185552.gif)
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 27 Mar 2014, 18:47
... the state don't have the second largest navy. They have the smallest, but the most technologically advanced and with a higher ratio of battleships.

You're misreading Falcon's post. That list was about general capability, not size. The State has the second strongest navy, not the second largest.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: V. Gesakaarin on 27 Mar 2014, 18:55

Super Special State Sentai Princess Brigade, ho!

(http://gooby.naurunappula.com/org/36/17/36174171bfd01d7e/0/1185552.gif)

Only true in haiku.

But back to the topic. What do people think that the State has the least population, but the second biggest navy (http://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3222074#post3222074)?

Probably because it's always been portrayed as a highly militarized society that believes everyone non-Caldari presents a potential existential threat to the continued survival of the State? That kind of thinking is probably why KK, Lai Dai, and Wiyrkomi are all heavily involved in domestic military industries.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 27 Mar 2014, 18:58
They always had the most advanced, which did make sense and it was also their trump card why people didn't fuck with them... But now second largest too with the least amount of people? I am not gonna even bother taking EVE fiction revamps seriously anymore :lol:

Super Special State Sentai Princess Brigade, ho!

(http://gooby.naurunappula.com/org/36/17/36174171bfd01d7e/0/1185552.gif)
:D

Yeah I agree, with both points. For me the most technological advance fleet, was also a trump card. The navy with the newest shenanigans, always up to date. Which makes it the most capital-intensive in New Eden, but also a fearsome fleet (even for its small size. Or that what I though before.). As you said "people didn't fuck with them"; as they have "the modern of the modern" stuff. :D

As for the changes, I agree. But I also dont see it negative, maybe it will bring more people. As well as with the notion you imply with "seriously", I see it the same way.


... the state don't have the second largest navy. They have the smallest, but the most technologically advanced and with a higher ratio of battleships.

You're misreading Falcon's post. That list was about general capability, not size. The State has the second strongest navy, not the second largest.

Actually you can read it both ways. As well as that he doesnt mention that they are the smallest either.



Super Special State Sentai Princess Brigade, ho!

(http://gooby.naurunappula.com/org/36/17/36174171bfd01d7e/0/1185552.gif)

Only true in haiku.

But back to the topic. What do people think that the State has the least population, but the second biggest navy (http://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3222074#post3222074)?

Probably because it's always been portrayed as a highly militarized society that believes everyone non-Caldari presents a potential existential threat to the continued survival of the State? That kind of thinking is probably why KK, Lai Dai, and Wiyrkomi are all heavily involved in domestic military industries.
Maybe. And the ships have a higher crew ratio then the gallente. Meaning, that it is most likely the case of capital intensive plus labor intensive. So no substitution (which I have no problem with).

It would also explain Falcons idea about the caldari could "fuck everybody". As I can thing such a navy could be really fearsome.

Edit:
Fix some typos.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 27 Mar 2014, 19:13
I don't ant to get into a quotation war with you, but a lot of the ones you produced there already make my point: There was by the PF a variety of different approaches possible. At least in the Tash-Murkon domains racism seems to be shunned quite blatantly. The comment of Heir Kador in regard to true Amarr was in distinction to spacebound 'kin' which means capsuleers even if of True Amarr race: This can't mean that true Amarr are seen as racially superior. The Superiority of the Amarr was never really predicated on racial superiority, but on being the race choosen by God. This choice isn't (or rather wasn't) thought of as binding God in any way: True Amarr can be stricken from the book of records and they loose their superiority with that. For example there is (or was?) no good reason for anyone to bow to a True Amarr heretic, simply because of his or her ancestry. If anything they were even considered worse than anyone else, for rejecting God even though he favoured them.

Also, there is still Scripture which says that everyone can be chosen by God:
"All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all;
When thine heart shines with the Light, thou shalt know no hardship;
When thine actions are in Light's name, thou art immortal."
- The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:1

I don't deny that it was already established as a widespread belief that Amarr are racially superior, but there always were other established schools of thought in Amarr which were carried by Ni-Kunni and Khanid holders, liberal Holders all over the Empire, rich merchants and most prominently by the Tash-Murkon family which apparently has little problems with keeping their position despite the jabs of the traditionally-minded houses.

EVE: Source in it's simplicity puts away with non-racism as an established school of thinking in Amarr. It might have been (slightly) atypical, but influential enough to put even Ardishapur under enough pressure to suspend his pet. It certainly wasn't the fringe position it has been degraded to by Source.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Esna Pitoojee on 27 Mar 2014, 19:14
The quotes do not say that racism is so inherently ingrained that every Amarr is a total racist, and nobody believes that other bloodlines can eventually become Chosen.

Breaking it down quote-by-quote:


Quote
While the champion himself must be of pure Amarrian descent, his wingmen are said to be allowed to be of any race and bloodline.

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=171&tid=4&_ga=1.39545891.1867853888.1395525975

True Amarr lead because they were first chosen, but others can achieve glory and recognition by opting to aid the faithful as well. This is little different from the situations of the Eudorians, Khanid, and Ni-Kunni (all of which are not strictly speaking True Amarr, but are at current varying distances along the path to becoming Chosen).

Quote
The arrest is said to come after the journalist interrupted a scripted press event with questions regarding a debated decision by the Amarr Imperial Succession Committee of allowing pilots of other races than Amarr to assist the "pure blooded" Amarrian champions in their upcoming combat duels.

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=174&tid=4&_ga=1.7881650.1867853888.1395525975

And some people don't like this. Nobody said that no one in the Empire was racist.

Quote
Uriam Kador, head of the Kador family, has intensified the ongoing debate surrounding Catiz Tash-Murkon's acquisition of the Tal-Romon Cathedral on Eclipticum by questioning the heir status of the Tash-Murkon family. The Tash-Murkons replaced the Khanid family when the latter broke from the Empire following Heideran's election as emperor. The nomination came as a surprise to most, not the least because the Tash-Murkons were Udorians, and thus not of pure Amarrian ancestry.

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=369&tid=4&_ga=1.62139564.1867853888.1395525975

Again, nobody was saying that nobody in the Empire had a purely ethnocentric view. The Kador are an explicitly traditionalist house who would be extremely likely to hold such views; again, this is no surprise to anyone.

Quote
"We should look to true Amarrians, the chosen people of God, barren of the impurities of their spacebound kin."

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=1404&tid=4&_ga=1.73033619.1867853888.1395525975

As before - the conservative traditionalist espouses ethnocentric views. No surprise there.

Quote
"House Sarum feels that the past open doors policy of ascension was patently ridiculous. We cannot and should not allow anyone but true Amarrians to decide the future of our glorious empire. It's no wonder that the last two chosen Emperors were such weaklings?"

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=1409&tid=4&_ga=1.73033619.1867853888.1395525975

And the conservative militant house as well.

Quote
"While we acknowledge and respect the views of the other Royal Houses, [the Tash-Murkon] Royal House is strongly against the racial implications of allowing only True Amarr to decide the next championship.

The Empire was forged in our collective blood. We worship the one and only Lord God. It is by all our strengths that the Empire was made great, and it will be by all our strengths that it shall continue."

With the only Royal House yet to make its views known on the subject the Amarr News Service managed to arrange a short sitting with Yonis Ardishapur himself shortly after a meeting with Chamberlain Karsoth.

"The Lord God saw fit to create only one race of his Chosen. We are that race. While the lesser races follow God's word faithfully and loyally, as well they should, and while they have their place within the Empire, it is not for them to rise above their station. Decisions of this importance should be left to God's true Chosen, and none other."

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=1425&tid=4&_ga=1.229778204.1867853888.1395525975

Again, the conservatives are more likely to be ethnocentric - no surprise there. Right above, however, the Tash-Murkons say that "The Empire was forged in our collective blood. We worship the one and only Lord God. It is by all our strengths that the Empire was made great, and it will be by all our strengths that it shall continue." Ethnocentrism is clearly not a universally-applied, totally homogenous rule in the faith; if it were, the Murkons' words would be heresy.

Quote
The majority of the criticism comes from Tanar's outspoken views on the purity of Amarrian heritage and the inferiority of those of non-pure Amarrian blood.

Tanar has been the center of criticism before, most recently three years ago when he gave a lecture entitled "Scriptural Evidence Supporting the Continuing Servitude of Udorians, Ealurians, Khanid, Ni-Kunni, and Minmatar." The lecture advocated a stripping of title and privilege from all citizens of the Empire who were not of pure True Amarrian ancestry, including reducing the royal Tash-Murkon Family to the status of commoners. The backlash generated by Udorian, Khanid, and liberal Amarrian Holders, in addition to threats of funding withdrawal from numerous wealthy non-True Amarrian merchants, resulted in Tanar receiving a year's suspension with pay from the Institute.

http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=2582&tid=2&_ga=1.236668801.1867853888.1395525975

And here it's even outright said - pure ethnocentrism/racism exists among the more conservative factions, but is highly controversial and not at all universally accepted in the Empire. If True Amarr being forever the only Chosen was codified in the scriptures, the controversy in the quote would not be occurring.

Quote
"My word lies within all,
All it requires is the breath of faith,
To ignite the fire,
So the lost can find their way,
So the fallen can rise,
To take their place as my chosen,
For you are all my creation,
And are all equal in my kingdom."
-The Apocryphon

"These texts are considered heretical by the Amarr clergy and anyone found preaching or distributing them is persecuted relentlessly."

https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/The_Apocryphon

Saying all are inherently equal is heretical. Big surprise - nobody's ever tried to claim the Amarr orthodoxy did not practice any kind of discrimination.


Quote from: Samira Kernher
What splits Amarr from Sabik is that with the Amarr only the True Amarr are Chosen (with the exception of the big controversy to claim that Khameiras are also Chosen), while in the Sabik faith anyone can theoretically become Chosen ("Savant").

Actually, the Sabik believe that savants/chosen are born destined for such:

"...the Sani Sabik faith embraced two central dogmas. The first was that certain people were born destined for greatness, with all others existing solely to serve and breed these savants. The second was that immortality was attainable by these savants." - Evelopedia (https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Sani_Sabik#History)

The issue with 'joining' is that the Sabik were willing to accept anyone who simply followed their ways as inherently Savant; this stands in stark contrast to the traditional Amarr view of Chosen-ness being gained through extended service and faith to the (orthodox) God.

Quote from: Samira Kernher
That anyone can become Chosen by faith in God is the one piece of Sabik Scripture we have, and this is a Scripture that is deemed heretical by orthodox Amarrian faith. Sure, there's no orthodox Scripture we have that outright says 'only the True Amarr are Chosen', so there is a bit of leeway on player interpretation, but when there is a Scripture that says "anyone can become Chosen by being faithful" and that this Scripture is deemed heretical, that says quite a lot to me.

Source doesn't stop characters from having the other interpretation ICly and arguing for that view, because at least from the Scriptures we have available it is possible to argue for that interpretation ICly. All that Source does is just reinforces canon that has already been there that the traditional belief is that only the True Amarr are God's Chosen, thus confirming that other interpretations are an atypical belief (which can be considered either simply liberal or heretical depending on character viewpoints).

On the contrary - it's still a controversial view with many different facets, as your quotes show. While conservative heirs can make noises that only True should be involved with highest-tier matters such as choosing the next Emperor, their views are not outright endorsed as the absolute truth - else, the Tash-Murkons would not have been able to get away with saying what they did. The Murkons' view, while obviously liberal compared to the Kador, Ardishapur and Sarum conservative views, are not by any means heretical.

tl;dr for others reading this - previously there were obviously conservative and liberal positions in the debate on how important ethnocentrism was in the Faith. Source took the conservative view and presented it as the only one. This does not jive with previous lore.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 27 Mar 2014, 19:46
Dont know. The Source is clear on this. I would even so far go and say: If you are not a true amarr you are a sinful. As it mention you cant never wash it off. So truth be told religion doesnt matter, it cant wash of your smell (as I mention before. Relgion isnt the paradigm. racism is. So I was wrong here (http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=5697.30).). So I would even so far go and say: If you are not a true amarr you are a heretic, you are sub-human, you are human trash and some are just human trash to some degree (Ni-Kunni, Khanid, etc... all human trash. They are just a smidge about trash, but still trash.).

Quote
Source Book:
True Amarr are held aloft by the rest of the Amarr society, viewed as secret paragons of piety. Other bloodlines are forever tainted by the sin of their ancestors, no matter how pious, no matter how fervent and faithful, they will never match the unstained purity of the True Amarr.
[...]
Regardless, everyone born in the empire has one thing in common; a constant reinforcement of religion, the natural order of True Amarr on top.


So yes, I get your points, and I think it is stupid too (and un-reasonable..etc...). And I could make hunderts of post and comments it would end up like the Kingdom discussion. And we all know how well this was going.*cough* True be told. When Im back, Im most likely left the amarr bloc anyway. So I dont care. As Lyn mention before about the Mandate, that it is the most useless faction there is (to lazy to search). I think that too. Only in my case it is the Kingdom. The Kingdom is the most useless faction there is. And if CCP want to fuck it, they should it do it in a game of thrones style. :D With a lot of blood and tears.  :P I would even help there, to finish it off with STYLE.  :D



So back to the topic. I really love the pictures. They are great. Just love the art work. The amarr have a dark temple (http://www.google.de/search?q=swtor+dark+temple&client=firefox-a&hs=Ko2&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=np&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=L9M0U76MFYzHsgbFooC4DQ&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ&biw=1680&bih=900) thing going and the gallente are totally cyberpunk badasses. Love both. I love it, as I mention here (http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=3068.0). For me they had always a cyberpunk aesthetic going (of course without the cyberpunk-dystopian structure).


Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Elmund Egivand on 27 Mar 2014, 20:03
I wish there's more Matar art though. Only two images in the Minmatar Republic chapter. What little I saw looked like Space Western plus Industrial.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 27 Mar 2014, 21:20
There is an assumption that equal opportunity in the hierarchy of the Empire and being Chosen are one in the same. They are not. At no point to my knowledge does Tash-Murkon or any other liberal character explicitly say or argue that non-True Amarr can become Chosen. What they specifically argue for is that non-True Amarr can be and are contributors to the faith and Empire, able to fill important positions in the Imperial hierarchy beyond simple servitude.

Quote from: Nicoletta Mithra
There was by the PF a variety of different approaches possible. At least in the Tash-Murkon domains racism seems to be shunned quite blatantly.

Quote from: Esna Pitoojee
Again, the conservatives are more likely to be ethnocentric - no surprise there. Right above, however, the Tash-Murkons say that "The Empire was forged in our collective blood. We worship the one and only Lord God. It is by all our strengths that the Empire was made great, and it will be by all our strengths that it shall continue." Ethnocentrism is clearly not a universally-applied, totally homogenous rule in the faith; if it were, the Murkons' words would be heresy.

Quote
And here it's even outright said - pure ethnocentrism/racism exists among the more conservative factions, but is highly controversial and not at all universally accepted in the Empire. If True Amarr being forever the only Chosen was codified in the scriptures, the controversy in the quote would not be occurring.

The common element in all of these is the belief that acknowledging the value of other races automatically means that non-True Amarr can become Chosen. It is entirely possible for a character to argue for equal rights in the hierarchy of the Empire while also believing that only True Amarr are Chosen by God. Belief in one does not presume belief in the other.

In the case of Tanar, the controversy was over his argument that all non-True Amarr are fit only to serve and can hold no titles or other positions of influence. His story does not say anything about Chosen, what it says is that he believed there was Scriptural evidence that mandated that non-True Amarr must only serve and never hold positions of importance.

Essentially, what we have to take from these examples should not be assumed to be 'can other races become Chosen?', when there is also the equally possible argument of 'what kind of influence and rights can non-Chosen have in the Empire?', which is the more likely one in my opinion. I see the acceptance of, say, Khanid Holders not to mean 'Khanid can become Chosen', but instead 'Non-Chosen of proven faith can become Holders'.

The only source that says that anyone can become Chosen, by that wording, is the Apocryphon. Not the Scriptures, not Tash-Murkon, not canon liberals. The latter three have said things that can be interpreted to mean such, can imply belief in that, but none of them explicitly say it.

I'm not going to say that the belief of becoming Chosen by non-Chosen doesn't exist. I'm sure it does, there's enough leeway to argue for it. But I would imagine such a thing is not open, with arguments instead being focused around responsibilities and opportunities while leaving the issue of 'becoming Chosen' unsaid. Hence why you always only see the conservative NPCs talking about the one true race, chosen by God, while liberals never use that same language about chosen people. They instead talk about societal contributions and strengths and being positive influences on the Empire. If someone outright said 'non-True Amarr are/should also be Chosen' in public discourse, I would see that starting a controversy (which is what we see with the Kameiras (https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Kameiras_%28Chronicle%29))

Quote
True Amarr lead because they were first chosen, but others can achieve glory and recognition by opting to aid the faithful as well. This is little different from the situations of the Eudorians, Khanid, and Ni-Kunni (all of which are not strictly speaking True Amarr, but are at current varying distances along the path to becoming Chosen).

Again, there is an assumption that becoming redeemed/faithful and becoming Chosen are the same thing. I have yet to see a source that says this beyond Apocryphon.

Quote
Also, there is still Scripture which says that everyone can be chosen by God:

"All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all;
When thine heart shines with the Light, thou shalt know no hardship;
When thine actions are in Light's name, thou art immortal."
- The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:1

I see nothing here that says that everyone can become Chosen. It says that the glory of faith is inherent in all, which can mean many things. It does not say that all can be God's Chosen. Unless something explicitly says that non-True Amarr can become Chosen, it is an interpretation. And the only Scripture that explicitly says it is a heretical one.

Quote
Actually, the Sabik believe that savants/chosen are born destined for such:

"...the Sani Sabik faith embraced two central dogmas. The first was that certain people were born destined for greatness, with all others existing solely to serve and breed these savants. The second was that immortality was attainable by these savants." - Evelopedia

The issue with 'joining' is that the Sabik were willing to accept anyone who simply followed their ways as inherently Savant; this stands in stark contrast to the traditional Amarr view of Chosen-ness being gained through extended service and faith to the (orthodox) God.

Stated as destiny, but in practice it's meritocratic hence why it appeals to commoners, as it is a method of social mobility that they don't otherwise have. For sects like the Blood Raiders, whether you were destiny is determined by your own efforts, "if you embraced the faith, then you were clearly destined". This is rather different from having your status laid out before you from birth and having no avenue to change it.

As far as "stark contrast to the traditional Amarr view of Chosen-ness being gained through extended service and faith to the (orthodox) God"... uh, no. The traditional Amarr view is that the Chosen are born that way. This is said in that same article. This is where the Sabik and Amarr faiths are similar.

"The second commonality is the belief in savants, individuals who are greater than their fellow man and capable of great achievements. The nature of these savants varies from sect to sect, with some following closely to the Amarr tradition of the chosen being born that way. The Blood Raiders view the practice more liberally, considering anyone strong enough to embrace the Blood Raider lifestyle worthy of being called one of the chosen. Such a belief is found in many of the other sects scattered across New Eden and is especially appealing to Amarr commoners, who seek to rise above their restrictive stations."

Being born Chosen is the traditional Amarr belief, as stated here, and the Sabik sects that believe similarly are the ones following closer to the orthodox Amarr religion.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 27 Mar 2014, 21:38
It is entirely possible for a character to argue for equal rights in the hierarchy of the Empire while also believing that only True Amarr are Chosen by God.

Ehm nice.  :D Can you flesh this out more? And please us "If, then" and "the more, the more" correlations; and a "Weber-Bath-tub". I hope you will then see what an error you have done, without me spelling out everything. As I have to do in fucking every discussion. :D



As for this space-opera-white-supremacy-movement topic....and the question: Has the empire a racist- or religious-paradigm? It is clearly a racist one. So deal with it. If CCP says so, then it is so.


By the way can one moderator come and split the thread into. (1) Source book feedback and (2) True-Amarr-supremacy-movement. Or how can I ask one?
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 27 Mar 2014, 22:07
The Amarr themselves not being Chosen from the start themselves aside, your argument, Samira, goes both ways: Nowhere does Scripture say that non-True Amarr can't become Chosen, nor do the quotes you provide. Even the quoted belief that one is being born chosen does merely mean that being chosen is inheritable, not that it can't be acquired (as the Amarr clearly did!). If what we have to take from these examples should not be assumed to be 'can other races become Chosen?', when there is also the equally possible argument of 'what kind of influence and rights can non-Chosen have in the Empire?', we should neither take it to be 'what kind of influence and rights can non-Chosen have in the Empire?', if it equally can be understood to mean'can other races become Chosen?'. That you prefer to interpret it as 'what kind of influence and rights can non-Chosen have in the Empire?' should be no reason at all to prefer that interpretation, unless you want to monopolize the interpretation PF to your person.

The idea that Chosen are only the True Amarr and nobody else can be Chosen isn't implied by necessity in these quotes. In fact,not even EVE: Source is explicitly asserting the stance you're espousing here:

Quote
Source Book:
True Amarr are held aloft by the rest of the Amarr society, viewed as secret paragons of piety. Other bloodlines are forever tainted by the sin of their ancestors, no matter how pious, no matter how fervent and faithful, they will never match the unstained purity of the True Amarr.
[...]
Regardless, everyone born in the empire has one thing in common; a constant reinforcement of religion, the natural order of True Amarr on top.

In fact it is giving exactly the stance that you argue to be valid is invalid: Amarr are on top by natural order (not by being chosen, interestingly!). This means it's not anymore possible (by Source) for a character to argue for equal rights in the hierarchy of the Empire, if he is a 'good citizen' of the Empire, while it previously was.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 27 Mar 2014, 22:17
In fact, given that the Empire was supposedly a 'theocratic' state, there should be no difference between religious and secular hierarchy, which you're trying to read into the PF here. If it would be possible for a Udorian to become Emperor on having distinguished himself mundanely, but not religiously, then the theocratic character is lost. It might, at best, then remain to be an Empire with worldly hierarchy and a state religion. We get repeatedly told that this, though, isn't how the Empire operates. Thus there is good reason to assume that your opinion is just not based in a thorough understanding of PF or that PF itself is conflicting or somesuch.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 27 Mar 2014, 22:38
Never said anything about distinguishing one's self mundanely but not religiously. Only that distinguishing is not a binary thing in which 'religiously distinguished = Chosen'.

Anyway, I'm pulling out of this topic. These are discussions better had in-character and I was dumb for letting myself get caught up in debating here.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Rin Kaelestria on 27 Mar 2014, 23:09
Just seems to me that CCP didn't know how to write a religious faith based society and so chose to dumb it down with racism and slavery.  :P

Either way, after all this talk about the source book, makes me regret asking my husband to get it for my birthday. Because, I know he did (told me after I mentioned not wanting it anymore), and don't feel up to the hassle to return it.  :s   Ah well, here's to being hopeful the art is good.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 27 Mar 2014, 23:18
The art is great, Rin. :)

As to debating in Character: I don't see how one can debate in Character whether EVE: Source breaks with prior PF or not. >,> Also, I don't see how one could distinguish oneself in a way that qualifies one religiously to lead others, that is not being chosen by God to lead.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Graelyn on 28 Mar 2014, 02:52
Watch meh!  :D
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lunarisse Aspenstar on 28 Mar 2014, 07:00
Just noticed this threadnaught. 

I also concur with what Rin said which was my impression, sadly enough, as well that whoever wrote it "didn't know how to write a religious faith based society and so chose to dumb it down with racism and slavery". 

Consequently, my comment elsewhere is better put here:

Quote from: Merdaneth on Today at 02:48 AM

You shouldn't care so much about canonicity.

Or rather: you should care as much about canonicity as you do in real life.

What is canon in real life? Wikipedia, what you read in your history books, what your priest tells you, what your parents told you, what you see on YouTube?

Just apply the same principle to EVE, and you'll have a lot less to worry about. EVE is not a religious order after all, its a virtual world.

*****

Also my attitude about Eve source.  Just like I tell my kids when reading history books or news articles, consider the author and the point of view/agenda they may be trying to push.  To the extent this is put to Luna IC, she may view this as being the product of Gallente/Minmatar academics.

Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lyn Farel on 28 Mar 2014, 13:36
What Rin said.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: V. Gesakaarin on 28 Mar 2014, 20:29
Well we all roleplay capsuleers in the end that enjoy the particular freedoms of being particularly divorced from the conformity pressures of any society; their cultural norms; legal and moral consequences; or indeed pretty much any consequences.

So I guess in the end if people prefer to ignore aspects of PF to make it more suitable for themselves and their characters to behave in the ways they wish then it doesn't really matter, insofar as the only people doing it right are the trillions of citizens living in New Eden and not the comparative handful of capsuleers who lead very different sorts of lives.

Although sometimes I do chuckle at the detection of those who seem to confuse "RP" with "PR" and argue vehemently, and complain bitterly, at any aspect of PF lore that contradicts their desires to placate their own personal views and bias on, "How things should be" so that it meshes with their own standards and beliefs.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 28 Mar 2014, 22:30
Well we all roleplay capsuleers in the end that enjoy the particular freedoms of being particularly divorced from the conformity pressures of any society; their cultural norms; legal and moral consequences; or indeed pretty much any consequences.

So I guess in the end if people prefer to ignore aspects of PF to make it more suitable for themselves and their characters to behave in the ways they wish then it doesn't really matter, insofar as the only people doing it right are the trillions of citizens living in New Eden and not the comparative handful of capsuleers who lead very different sorts of lives.

Although sometimes I do chuckle at the detection of those who seem to confuse "RP" with "PR" and argue vehemently, and complain bitterly, at any aspect of PF lore that contradicts their desires to placate their own personal views and bias on, "How things should be" so that it meshes with their own standards and beliefs.
Define "standards and beliefs". So that we dont just talk in the abstract. As well as could you give an example for "their desires to placate their own personal views and bias".... You can even take me as example, I dont mind.  ;)

Because I hoped, I always make clear on my critique what the point is. If someone does not understand this *Publius looks at H. Caul and Eterne*... then sorry it is not my fault. I can just again and again point out un-logical errors... and give examples to my points... if the the other side dont understand, or read it; I dont see it as my fault actually (as I always point out, that people can ask.. asking isnt nazi. ;)). The only fault which I can see is, that I saw EVE as SciFi universe and not as space opera/sci fi fantasy. But this point have I made more then ones clear, that I know that is my fault.  ;)

So self-reflection is a skill, which I hoped some people on the other side would also have. But I dont will start with some of the comments I got (like: english-bachlor unlike you or I define it that way... crap). True be told there are many errors and mind boggling idiocracies in the lore. So I understand when people get worked up. And I also understand it when people call it what it is. True be told if something is un-logical, or breaks own lore, or laws, it will always get some head scratching. And with always, I mean ALWAYS. Example: My critique on the "Kingdom interdependent topic" does not go away by stupid onliners, or ignoring. Or in other word, sending me a comment/answer with more or less "go fuck yourself" (just in nicer words), those maybe "fix" the problem with me (as I answer in the same tone back.. even if I get banned). BUT I DOESNT FIX THE PROBLEM; or in other words. Most likely in few years CCP will find another guy/costumer which just asks the same questions.**

As for me as I told often. I have just to change my few on EVE and see it more through space opera eyes. :D As for that the Source Book is actually really good. I think it fits the tone of a larger then life story better.... By the way. I will give the next days a longer feedback then my current: "I love the picture"... Which lets me sound like a superficial dick***....







________
** True be told, Im to much of a capitalist, that I let such thing slide. As I think, a individual "go fuck yourself just in nicer words" for every costumer (1) on any problem (2), will cost in the end more time and MONEY as just to fix things in the first place.... But as I said it is just me. :P :P
***Im a superficial dick, but I dont need to look like one. :P
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 29 Mar 2014, 07:59
So now the feedback.....

I actually like the book (it has some flaws... as mention before). but overall it has answer really some questions. So I will start first with the new information:

- General Information about hard SciFi. Stargates, Dust Soldiers, etc... Thumbs up. I actually even thing a two volume Source would be possible (as mention before). One hard SciFi... with goes from Drones, over human-androids, drugs, to Ship information (I personally liked the old ship vids wich had come with the last book.). Like Volume I "General Hard fiction and Ships" Volume II "Factions and Politics"... But of course as it now is also good. So thumbs up.

- Amarr Empire. As mention before I had some other Ideas.. in the topic education, arts, paradigm etc... But I actually dont mind the Amarr Chapter. Alot of information where already there and just got sum up (as of some of the changes-as I mention below***-I would word it maybe softer. But it in the end is is just taste. Maybe it was a try to make something like the old sith empire (SWTOR)? I dont know?). General well written chapter, thumbs up.

- I always had problems with what is what in the Mandate. Like what is the RotAM, or the Ammatar Governor, Ammatar Consulate Governor* (http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=2173&tid=2), or the Ammatar Consulate High Commissioner* (http://communityclassic.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=1437&tid=4). I always asked myself how those all fit together and what would be Yonis title... RotAM? As for now the book as clear this point. He is the Ammatar Governor. I actually think this will help to make things more clear... So thumbs up.

- The Minmatar Republic. I hoped for more information. How the new Republic looks like. But we have some more information "Responsibility and Powers". So thumbs up. The tribal chief list (page97). I think we will see more of them, or I hope so. All power to normadic-space-vikings-tribes, as I think it will help more to define what a matari is (not just in the opposition to the Amarr).

- Minor things... I like the Minmatar chart with the crime rates. As I always thought the minmatar had a nice outlaw thing going.* (http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=3102.msg47947#msg47947) I would even love more stuff. Still... thumbs up

- "Growing Up {{Factionname}}" chapters. I like them. They give a nice inside what is going own.

- Like the story parts of each faction..... Ehm minor nix-pick. The Caldari had "just" the Arcurio information, which is from the size like Dominion, or Caille, or Spark, but doesnt give personal inside. It maybe a irony of history/writing, that the cold-blue-metal faction gets a cold description about living on the ground, without the personal/human/storytelling of living on the ground. :D

- Caldari break down... I hoped for more information, but generally I like it. Some new tiny information about the eight. Overall thumbs up.

- Inside the corporate jungle (page126). Love it. As for me a great read. Thumbs up.

- Like the Jove chapter. Truthfully I havent read much about them. So I can judge the content, I thinks there are better experts on this topic. But as for the information given it looked nice. I also liked the blue-grey-ish skinned pair.


Let downs... Actually just one thingy.. the minor factions... The Thukker arent mention, as well as the Khanid. I thing that part overall felt to short. I would love to read more of the "one region nations"... aka Intaki Syndicate, Ammatar Mandate, Khanid Kingdom and Thukker Tribe.


Overall a nice buy, I dont mind the money spend. The book looks great. :D And yes I said it again. Sorry Im superficial. :P When it comes to the art, it is really well done and fit to the mood of the text. I would just hoped for more^^.....


_____
***As for paradigm-shifts (the topic pages before. Visual arts, education... role of bloodlines ...Damius II=Damius III? etc...). I actually dont mind them. I would reword some stuff and make it less absolute, alittle softer; but in the end it is just my taste. :D Example: "With the aid of the Khanid Kingdom, she captured and executed Karsoth," Would I change a little so that it doesnt sound like she captured him. But as I said VERY minor things. As well as I would word some stuff softer, which is even more minor then minor. As it maybe comes with the trade off that it is less dystopian?
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Andreus Ixiris on 29 Mar 2014, 09:05
Did they give a less dumb explanation for how stargates and warp drives work?
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Katrina Oniseki on 29 Mar 2014, 09:27
Did they give a less dumb explanation for how stargates and warp drives work?

They gave one for Stargates. Didn't see one for warp drives yet.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lyn Farel on 29 Mar 2014, 10:35

Although sometimes I do chuckle at the detection of those who seem to confuse "RP" with "PR" and argue vehemently, and complain bitterly, at any aspect of PF lore that contradicts their desires to placate their own personal views and bias on, "How things should be" so that it meshes with their own standards and beliefs.

I often chuckle at the detection of those who seem to confuse criticism with whimsical claims. vOv

Well, if they finally decided to take the first opinion of the two main ones that float over the web - "The Amarr are retarded space medievals" and "The Amarr are a modern alien society based on faith" - that's their choice eventually. I will certainly not complain for once they make things pretty clear on the matter.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 29 Mar 2014, 14:09
Did they give a less dumb explanation for how stargates and warp drives work?

Ehm I just write it down (I hope you dont mind typos)... as I will make it fast.O7

"It is undoubted that a race capable of interstellar travel roamed New Eden thousands of years ago. A number of ancient star gates and acceleration gates have been discovered in various systems across the cluster, all of which have a peculiar factor in common carbon dating*** shows that these gates were all constructed within a time frame of approximately 150 years. It is believed that these individuals were those who initially ventured forth through the EVE Gate to colonize the cluster.

The system of New Eden remains an enigma; as does that which lies on the opposite side of the EVE Gate. Scientists across the cluster speculate on the origins of mankind and wonder where our knowledge of star gate construction and faster-than-light travel originated. A star gate is an immensely complex mesh of astrophysics, science, and mathematics that to most people seems an impenetrable wall of equations and jargon.

In layman´s terms, a star gate generates an artificial wormhole, through which a vessel passes to its destination. These gates are constructed to exploit areas of natural gravitational resonance, or harmony, either on the edges of solar system or in the areas where a sufficiently large or dense celestial body creates a relative equilibrium between itself and the star it orbits.****

While this resonance is not required to be absolute (such as, for example, when two celestrial bodies cancel each other´s gravitational effect completely-the ideal conditions for a star gate), gravitational distortion most remain below an acceptable threshold for star gate´s subsystems to be able to function normally. Once that condition is satisfied, a stable link can be created between the source and the destination nodes. These nodes are the gates themselves. They operate in pairs, their interstellar positioning arrays and mainframes linked directly via the fluid router system for instantaneous point-to-point communication.

When a vessel requests jump clearance, the source node transmits a basic carrier signal that includes data on the class of the vessel, its mass, its current status, and its CISC (CONCORD Identification Serial Code) to the destination nodes, which the confirms receipt of the data. This entire process is automated, consisting of direct communication between the mainframes of the paired star gate."

The gates then confirm alignment to each other before activating magnetic fields. Once this process is confirmed by both the source and the destination nodes, they simultaneously fire a focused beam of gravitons towards each other, folding space-time consistent with Weyl tensor dynamics, which creates a temporal singularity-or more simply, a tear in space-time-at both the source and the destination nodes. The two nodes monitor these singularities at intervals of one picosecond, ensuring they are stable before the source gate begins to stream negatively charged gravitons toward the destination, which in turn acts as a receiver, positively charged.


This is the first third. I write the rest  when I have more time... :(

_______
***carbon dating doesnt work that way.... We would need to know the 14C is/was constant as it is on earth atmosphere the case.. to make rückschlüsse/conclusion back. Even more that the organic stuff on, or in the gates would be most likely taken form other/various lactation (planets with differnent 14C numbers)... meaning he would just measure a knowing disintegrations from/towards a earth level. As we cant see how much/on what level the organic thing has absorbed as it lived (aka is former place. Like which planet). I know what I wrote sounds weird... I can make an example if needed....
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: V. Gesakaarin on 29 Mar 2014, 14:28
Re: Publius

While there may at times be something lost in translation with your thoughts, I do tend to think they come from an analysis from some sort of objective viewpoint and the construction of thoughts and theory that tries to be internally consistent.

What I'm talking about is say, about 2-3 years ago I put forward the idea that the Caldari might be a homophobic society or at the very least disagree with homosexuality on these forums given some hints from mission texts and other PF. At the time a lot of people tried to argue, there's no way the Caldari could be homophobic, for no other reason that I could detect than a desire to defend their public space lesbianism and that it might portray the Caldari as, "Bad" by modern standards.

Well it turns out the Caldari do in fact disagree with homosexuality, and I was correct, because I prefer to use the PF to reach a conclusion instead of reaching a conclusion first and trying to make the PF fit it.

I mean the same thing I can see with the Amarr. Whenever I see people trying to twist the PF to ameliorate the consequences of slavery and conquest inherent in the Amarr faith I see it as nothing more than people trying to make it palatable to a modern audience in some kind of attempt at meta-PR. Because once slavery, conquest, and the racial intolerence/prejudice is removed from the Amarr you might as well be roleplaying a character that prescribes to a Christian ethic that just so happens to fly spaceships.

Nothing wrong with that really, since we're all playing capsuleers who can think and do what they want, but at least call a spade a spade with what you're trying to do.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 29 Mar 2014, 15:36
Re: Publius

While there may at times be something lost in translation with your thoughts, I do tend to think they come from an analysis from some sort of objective viewpoint and the construction of thoughts and theory that tries to be internally consistent.

What I'm talking about is say, about 2-3 years ago I put forward the idea that the Caldari might be a homophobic society or at the very least disagree with homosexuality on these forums given some hints from mission texts and other PF. At the time a lot of people tried to argue, there's no way the Caldari could be homophobic, for no other reason that I could detect than a desire to defend their public space lesbianism and that it might portray the Caldari as, "Bad" by modern standards.

Well it turns out the Caldari do in fact disagree with homosexuality, and I was correct, because I prefer to use the PF to reach a conclusion instead of reaching a conclusion first and trying to make the PF fit it.

I mean the same thing I can see with the Amarr. Whenever I see people trying to twist the PF to ameliorate the consequences of slavery and conquest inherent in the Amarr faith I see it as nothing more than people trying to make it palatable to a modern audience in some kind of attempt at meta-PR. Because once slavery, conquest, and the racial intolerence/prejudice is removed from the Amarr you might as well be roleplaying a character that prescribes to a Christian ethic that just so happens to fly spaceships.

Nothing wrong with that really, since we're all playing capsuleers who can think and do what they want, but at least call a spade a spade with what you're trying to do.

I know my english isnt the best, so I dont mind questions or discussions to fix miss understandings.





As for the general topic:
Funny that everybody thinks I try to remove racism form the Amarr. As I said on the topic before... I just had another paradigm in mind (http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=5697.45). As well as Lyn already mention. My stuff doesnt mean that their are not racist or that my Char isnt racist... As I also told in the thread later... that I know "racist asshole because of religion" is the same as "racist asshole because of supremacy", or as I word it "racist action out of reason x, is the same as racist action out reason y. Both are just the same, aka racist action. (http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=5697.45)" Or as Lyn implied/said it nicely. As for me, Im even worse then the most. As I mention before I have just few slaves and just rent-seek those of my family, which makes me even worse. ;) I dont use them, because of a goal... profit or salvation as their arent my. I just use them for my utility.

So my critique as I said before isnt that I dont like stuff. My critque is that stuff isnt logical, or breaks laws, or lore. The best example is really the Khanid topic.* (http://eve-search.com/thread/193229-1)* (https://wiki.eveonline.com/wikiEN/index.php?title=Publius_Valerius_%28Character%29&oldid=170067) As well as that I dont just state about theories, I state about laws.


I would even so far go to say, that what you imply towards me or Mithra is actually the case with the other side. As I really cant explain the past emphasis on the NA white supremacy movement. I think all the this is more the case as I mention pages before (http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=5787.msg95893#msg95893) on this thread... of "I just know one version of racism therefore the Amarr have to be that way." I think Arista Shahni (http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=5697.msg93933#msg93933) and Samira Kernher (http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=5702.msg94357#msg94357) are prime examples of this, and their anti towards a asian majority thing.** As I mention before, amarrians wouldnt fear a majority-minority change as those modern racist movements. They even dont need to make other white (http://www.amazon.com/Irish-Became-White-Routledge-Classics/dp/0415963095). As they dont need to form a voter coalition. So If I say religion is the legitimation for slavery do I exclude racism? No. I would even say, as many other to that is just another form of racism.*** My own char is prime example for this* (http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=3112.msg46775#msg46775)... I would even say I the worst racist there is...even more then every cotton slaver or Walt Disney. :P As I do all the things I do without seeing me, or acting chosen/supreme/pure/enlighten. Which means that my char doesnt sees himself as neither supreme through bloodline (Kernher) or supreme through devotion/service (Mithra). Which makes him a mess up asshole which acts without a own legitimation, besides the notion: "I CAN. THATS WHY I DO RACIST ACTIONS"  :D

So long story short. I would actually take your point and say, that some people just want THEIR version of racism, which they are know and comfortable with. But even in our world exist more racism then the NA white supremacy movement. But they somehow just want one, or know one, or like one version. Or lets say to make things less harsh and personal, TonyG wants them to be that way... that their is just one version of racism.


__
** I wouldnt even narrow RP. As every faction in EVE the mode (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mode_%28statistics%29) is hold by white (see source).
*** I would even say, as many other to that is just another form of racism. My own char is prime example for this... I would even say I the worst racist there is...even more then every cotton slaver or Walt Disney. :P As I do just things because of my inferiority (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sn6EZoeQz2o#t=22m) and that I dont have a responsibility towards then (nor profit or salvation).


Edit:
Generally in RL I had so much do with "I cant be wrong people" in the past, that I actually dont mind CCPs stupidity. As it is fun for me to shit on those people. I can just facepalm about the Khanid topic. I still cant believe, that I had to explain an wannabe historian (Caul) who Thucydides was and the melian dialogue, as well as a wannabe writer (Eterne) not to break the own lore. So my opinion wasnt high in the first place, so in this light have people to read my feedback. ;) After all its a game book, and they are close to Uwe Boll movies most of the time. :P
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: orange on 29 Mar 2014, 18:39
about 2-3 years ago I put forward the idea that the Caldari might be a homophobic society or at the very least disagree with homosexuality on these forums given some hints from mission texts and other PF. At the time a lot of people tried to argue, there's no way the Caldari could be homophobic, for no other reason that I could detect than a desire to defend their public space lesbianism and that it might portray the Caldari as, "Bad" by modern standards.

Well it turns out the Caldari do in fact disagree with homosexuality, and I was correct, because I prefer to use the PF to reach a conclusion instead of reaching a conclusion first and trying to make the PF fit it.

Reread the short thread (http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=873.0) assuming it is the one you are talking about and consider if it matches how you are remembering it.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 30 Mar 2014, 04:03
Did they give a less dumb explanation for how stargates and warp drives work?

Ehm I just write it down (I hope you dont mind typos)... as I will make it fast.O7

"It is undoubted that a race capable of interstellar travel roamed New Eden thousands of years ago. A number of ancient star gates and acceleration gates have been discovered in various systems across the cluster, all of which have a peculiar factor in common carbon dating*** shows that these gates were all constructed within a time frame of approximately 150 years. It is believed that these individuals were those who initially ventured forth through the EVE Gate to colonize the cluster.

The system of New Eden remains an enigma; as does that which lies on the opposite side of the EVE Gate. Scientists across the cluster speculate on the origins of mankind and wonder where our knowledge of star gate construction and faster-than-light travel originated. A star gate is an immensely complex mesh of astrophysics, science, and mathematics that to most people seems an impenetrable wall of equations and jargon.

In layman´s terms, a star gate generates an artificial wormhole, through which a vessel passes to its destination. These gates are constructed to exploit areas of natural gravitational resonance, or harmony, either on the edges of solar system or in the areas where a sufficiently large or dense celestial body creates a relative equilibrium between itself and the star it orbits.****

While this resonance is not required to be absolute (such as, for example, when two celestrial bodies cancel each other´s gravitational effect completely-the ideal conditions for a star gate), gravitational distortion most remain below an acceptable threshold for star gate´s subsystems to be able to function normally. Once that condition is satisfied, a stable link can be created between the source and the destination nodes. These nodes are the gates themselves. They operate in pairs, their interstellar positioning arrays and mainframes linked directly via the fluid router system for instantaneous point-to-point communication.

When a vessel requests jump clearance, the source node transmits a basic carrier signal that includes data on the class of the vessel, its mass, its current status, and its CISC (CONCORD Identification Serial Code) to the destination nodes, which the confirms receipt of the data. This entire process is automated, consisting of direct communication between the mainframes of the paired star gate.

The gates then confirm alignment to each other before activating magnetic fields. Once this process is confirmed by both the source and the destination nodes, they simultaneously fire a focused beam of gravitons towards each other, folding space-time consistent with Weyl tensor dynamics, which creates a temporal singularity-or more simply, a tear in space-time-at both the source and the destination nodes. The two nodes monitor these singularities at intervals of one picosecond, ensuring they are stable before the source gate begins to stream negatively charged gravitons toward the destination, which in turn acts as a receiver, positively charged."


This is the first third. I write the rest  when I have more time... :(

_______
***carbon dating doesnt work that way.... We would need to know the 14C is/was constant as it is on earth atmosphere the case.. to make rückschlüsse/conclusion back. Even more that the organic stuff on, or in the gates would be most likely taken form other/various lactation (planets with differnent 14C numbers)... meaning he would just measure a knowing disintegrations from/towards a earth level. As we cant see how much/on what level the organic thing has absorbed as it lived (aka is former place. Like which planet). I know what I wrote sounds weird... I can make an example if needed....

This causes the nodes to effectively "reach" for each other, their retaining magnetic fields preventing external gravitational distortion and focusing it on the two rifts as the wormhole begins to form, causing a tentacle-like structure reaching from source to destination, the beginning of which is often seen to the naked eye as a building ball of white light at the center of the star gate´s superstructure. Within a nanosecond, the link is established and a positively charged sphere of mass boson particles begins to form around the vessel, enveloping it and coating its surface as it is pulled into the rift. As the vessel passes into the wormhole, the mass boson particles can usually be momentarily viewed as a sphere of distorted light around the vessel before it vanishes into the rift.

As the vessel travels from source to destination, this positive charge is dissipated, as the elasticity of the particles assists in maintaining the vessel´s structural integrity and prevents it from being torn apart by intense gravitational force. On arrival at the destination, both nodes cease their release of gravitons, sealing the two rifts and closing the wormhole, causing the vessel to become trapped in the destination node´s retaining magnetic field, which then scans the vessel, ensuring that its mass and status remain the same and its CISC matches that of the source node. Once the jump is confirmed as complete, the gate´s retaining magnetic field shuts down, releasing the vessel.

For approximately one minute after the vessel´s arrival, the remnants of the mass boson sphere and the coating of particles produce a localized gravity well, bending light around the hull and effectively rendering the vessel invisible to the naked eye and most conventional sensor systems unless it moves.

With this relatively simple principle, used universally across all star gates, pilots can traverse the entirety of the cluster in a matter of hours. While various methods of generating a retaining magnetic field and a beam of gravitons exist, depending o which race designed the star gate and the manufacturer of the star gate´s subsystems, the basic physical principle behind the artificial generation of wormholes for the purpose of travel remains the same. The only thing that changes is the scale of he structures, a factor that depends on the length of jump to be undertaken-across systems, constellations, or entire regions.

Star gate technology is the backbone of humankind´s ventures into space. Never before has a safer or more valuable system of travel been invented. The only disadvantage of the of the star gate is the requirement to fly under conventional power to the site of the destination node before it can be constructed. This is a journey that can often take upwards of a century, and many an expedition has gone radio silent twenty or forty or seventy years in-fallen prey to madness, technical malfunction, hunger, or whatever unknown dangers may lurk on the fringes of explored space.

This has been the case with almost all the expeditions launched in the last half century or so. Much of this has to do with the fact that for the time being, humankind appears to have reached the functional boundaries of New Eden. No suitable destination node signatures have been found in dozens of years, so the few expeditions still active have been sent toward points that, though carefully triangulated by top astrometry experts, still amount to little more than educated guesses. Therefore, until some form of new breakthrough is achieved, the far reaches of the dark will remain a mystery to the inhabitants of New Eden."



This is the second and third part. I hope I could help. As for to copyright-question. Ehm... Is it okay that I wrote it down? Will it be catacombed? Should I delete it so, that the forum doesnt gets a hit form CCP? Or just my account, so that you can say.. we took actions?
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Vincent Pryce on 30 Mar 2014, 04:10
So, what about Angel Cartel? Is it still lead by magical space witch hermit on a mystery asteroid?

I tried asking this from the two main authors in a public venue, but neither chose to answer me.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lyn Farel on 30 Mar 2014, 04:24
So, they eventually removed those binary stars thing for stargates to work ?

I mean the same thing I can see with the Amarr. Whenever I see people trying to twist the PF to ameliorate the consequences of slavery and conquest inherent in the Amarr faith I see it as nothing more than people trying to make it palatable to a modern audience in some kind of attempt at meta-PR. Because once slavery, conquest, and the racial intolerence/prejudice is removed from the Amarr you might as well be roleplaying a character that prescribes to a Christian ethic that just so happens to fly spaceships.

Ah, I thought people twisting the Amarr religion into space christianism were actually RL atheist crusaders as a mean to use shitloads of strawmen :ugh:
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Jace on 30 Mar 2014, 07:03
So, what about Angel Cartel? Is it still lead by magical space witch hermit on a mystery asteroid?

I tried asking this from the two main authors in a public venue, but neither chose to answer me.

The Angel section still says that the true leadership is still unknown, etc. They didn't change that.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Ember Vykos on 31 Mar 2014, 22:11
So, what about Angel Cartel? Is it still lead by magical space witch hermit on a mystery asteroid?

I tried asking this from the two main authors in a public venue, but neither chose to answer me.

The Angel section still says that the true leadership is still unknown, etc. They didn't change that.

Yes, but it also hints about the "hidden masters" being a ploy and the truth being in plain sight. They point to that being Vukenda, but I think it might be Vukenda, Kreiss, Stormare, Cybon, and Kruzhor together. v0v
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nmaro Makari on 07 Apr 2014, 17:48
I have to agree with the opinion that there seems to be a significant bleeding effect, with IC and OOC lines blurring and people confusing what they want their faction to be with what it actually is, and was.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Katrina Oniseki on 07 Apr 2014, 18:20
I have to agree with the opinion that there seems to be a significant bleeding effect, with IC and OOC lines blurring and people confusing what they want their faction to be with what it actually is, and was.
[/quote

Admitted.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 10 Apr 2014, 09:46
I mean the same thing I can see with the Amarr. Whenever I see people trying to twist the PF to ameliorate the consequences of slavery and conquest inherent in the Amarr faith I see it as nothing more than people trying to make it palatable to a modern audience in some kind of attempt at meta-PR. Because once slavery, conquest, and the racial intolerence/prejudice is removed from the Amarr you might as well be roleplaying a character that prescribes to a Christian ethic that just so happens to fly spaceships.

First, if one thinks that after removing slavery, conquest and racial intolerance/prejudice from the Amarr one is left with space Christianism, then one does have quite a lack of knowledge of the Christian religion as well as Amarr PF. This argument is not only a slippery slope, but a straw man as well.

Second, there is a huge difference between arguing that Amarr has a plurality of stances culturally availabe and trying to remove slavery, conquest and racial intolerance/prejudice from the faction alltogether: I don't feel in the least affected by that argument, in fact it simply flies by me as it doesn't at all match what I argue. My point rather is that Amarr sees slavery and conquest as valid options that can be (ethically) justified, given certain circumstances - but aren't the only options available. They have been in the past been portrayed as being more sophisticated than only relying on one option. Similarly, I don't aim at all to remove racial intolerance/prejudice from Amarr entirely, I rather argue that it's has been in past PF not at all the only option available for Amarr and though maybe for some reasons or the other the most widespread (probably because simplistic worldviews are also attractive to future humans) option, certainly not the most convincing option available in and to Amarr by past PF.

Third, as to the issue of OOC 'bleedover', any fiction available will for the purposes of RP always be interpreted. Interpretation though will always go in the OOC -> IC direction, as any RP is based on OOC understandings of a fictional background. If people want to style that already as "bleedover", than such bleedover is inavoidable and all parties here are guilty of it. Furthermore, though, I don't see at all how an OOC discussion of whether any faction is is portrayed realistically or too simplisticas well as whether CCP  removed with EVE: Source too many grey areas for the sake of a simple black-white dichotomy qualifies as bleedover into IC. Also, I'd venture the claim that if people would actually confuse what they want their faction to be with what it actually is, and was, they'd be those that would have the least reason to  complain, because after all for them, their faction is just how they want it to be, no?

Lastly, I have to agree with Lyn: There are many people who tend to a interpretation of the Empire that makes it's worst  characteristics the only one that shine through, or at least makes those overproportionally prominent. Be it that they oppose religion IRL and are thus informed in their interpretation of the Empire (up to simply ascribing to Amarr what they perceive to be inconsistent in RL religions even against PF), be it that they are ardent democrats or simply are opposed to the Empire as their characters ended up to be in an opposing faction. So equally as it prolly happens all the time that how one wants the own faction to be informs how one interpretes the available PF, it is true that how one wants the opposing factions to be informs the interpretation of PF. And who wants, deep down, to fight an enemy that isn't evil? Truth be told, most of us find it much easier to oppose things that we percieve to be abhorrent and thus we automatically tend to give the opposing factions a less cheritable view.

The Amarr are also quite suited to be interpreted that simplisticly as they espouse two characteristics (and I think no one denies that they do, really) that we are either taught as being 'obviously' abhorrent (in the case of slavery) or many had traumatic experiences with (religion) and that we all understand as something that should be seperated from the political sphere at least (so theocracy again flies against our understanding of freedoms humans have innately). With the internet community being made up mostly of individuals that highly value freedom and quite a high percentage of people generally loathe (organized) religion the Amarr Empire seems to be the natural enemy stereotype of EVE's general demographic.

If anything, therefore, portaying the Amarr Empire as having accomodating or maybe even positive traits aside and - God forbid! - even within those abhorrent practices of theocracy and slavery (and racial intolerance/prejudice of course) is something that is unpalatable to most EVE players. In my opinion that is though what makes the Amarr Empire interesting: That it shows that it's not self-evident that theocracy and slavery are abhorrent practices, but that it is a cultural accomplishment of our civilization that we came (over centuries, really) tho this conclusion - something that we are prone to forget. And furthermore that it also shows that those activities can be comitted by people that are not inherently evil, but have in fact good intentions. Because that reminds us - painfully - that our good intentions are no sufficient defense against us committing horrible actions.

And then there's another instance, there are apparently those that want the experience of abusing people as well as those that want the experience of being abused, for whatever reasons and be it only in RP - which is at least kind'a socially accepted in contrast to living out these fantasies IRL. Over my years in the Amarr community I had my fair share of those people, especially of the latter type. This went up to people going all crazy OOC onme for not clearly have my character abuse theirs. Especially after those people repeatedly had their character do actions that were clearly out to provoke punishment after I denied them leashings to half-death for no reason whatsoever and my char simply put them into psychological counseling - as those chars were clearly suffering from a disorder there.

Also there seem to be the people that simply can't think of slavery as being possible without an underlying racism to justify it. I'm not quite sure if that's because their view is informed by southern US slavery as I know little about that. But I know that there were native Americans that kept other native and black people as slaves and also free black people in the south that kept black slaves. Certinly those fre black people didn't think that they were justfied to keep black slaves because they were racially inferior. I'm not quite sure if there are incidences of white slaves in the US.

Anyhow there are historically many incidences of slavery that were not based on a racist ideology and in fact many economic studies point to the hypothesis that slavery is to be understood as an economical phenomenon. The latter would explain the former.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Louella Dougans on 17 Apr 2014, 12:38
would Eve Source mean that things like the "secret stairway" mission chain are no longer PF ?

that's the one where there are the Amarr anti-slavery activists, who have a different interpretation of the relevant passages in the scriptures, and are at least as zealous about their beliefs as pro-slavery people are.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 17 Apr 2014, 14:30
I have made this page: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Culture_of_the_Amarr_Empire it is a copy from the source book. You people can edit it, and reword or change anything you like. I sadly will be soon gone, as my account runs out. :( Nevertheless, you can add there more information, or deleted stuff what you think does not fit. Have fun and fly save. ;)
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lyn Farel on 18 Apr 2014, 12:10
Quote
Those descended from the original inhabitants of Amarr Island (called True Amarr) are held aloft by the rest of Amarr society, viewed as sacred paragons of piety. Other bloodlines are forever tainted by the sins of their ancestors; no matter how pious, no matter how fervent and faithful, they shall never match the unstained purity of the True Amarr soul.

 :|
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Arnulf Ogunkoya on 18 Apr 2014, 12:19
Quote
Those descended from the original inhabitants of Amarr Island (called True Amarr) are held aloft by the rest of Amarr society, viewed as sacred paragons of piety. Other bloodlines are forever tainted by the sins of their ancestors; no matter how pious, no matter how fervent and faithful, they shall never match the unstained purity of the True Amarr soul.

 :|

To be fair I've heard of stranger beliefs in real religions.

Good examples of this. The Roman Catholic idea that the Pontiff can speak for the creator under some circumstances. Or, from the other end of the spectrum, the Wiccan notion of the law of threefold return.

Both just as crazy in their own way.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Gaven Lok ri on 24 Apr 2014, 11:41
Not sure why that gets a meh face, it has always been quite clear in the PF.

Amarr *are* racist. Its religiously inspired rather than pseudo-science inspired, but if you are True Amarr and faithful you are considered better than everyone else, period. The fact that some Amarrians find Tash-Murkon having *any* non-True Amarr ancestry problematic comes from this.

Flip side is that the True Amarr that go bad are probably *more* damned than say a Ni-Kunni that went bad.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lyn Farel on 24 Apr 2014, 12:51
No, the meh face is about a minor (but oh so much important) nuance now telling that no matter how pious, fervent and faithful, no matter what your deeds, if you are not true amarr, you are stained forever into oblivion. Making eventually the Reclaiming rather pointless or nonsensical since you can't basically redeem people. Some might even accuse it of being directly a big, huge, colossal lie / cosmic farce.

Some will argue that you might still be saved yeah, but less saved than the true amarr of course. You are enlightened, but less than a true Amarr, which is a valid view. But it certainly has never been the only view, and their blanket painting of it gets back to what Nico said above : they only exposed the hardliner version as the main canon of Amarr. The simple fact that the TM family is part of the privy council and can even produce emperors, which are the direct voice of God and the pure among the pure, and yet are not true amarr, proves that either that precise tenet is false or a lie, or just that the whole Amarr institution is corrupt and/or heretical.

Well, as long as they state stuff clearly in the canon once and for all, all the better. They just chose a facet of the Amarr to represent them as a whole, which has been extremely irritating and is probably the last straw that made me leave for good (maybe for the best though). vOv
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Gaven Lok ri on 25 Apr 2014, 00:32
See, I don't see that as hardliner, but rather as mainstream.

Hardliner is Tetrimonic killing of slaves rather than allowing their release. Or things along those lines.

Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Graelyn on 25 Apr 2014, 03:22
As Amarrian history and RL history proves, religion is always malleable.

The rise of a new class of godlike, deathless beings will probably be a catalyst to more such change.

I'm actually somewhat annoyed by what I've heard from Source, because a year ago, when I had a big plan of a capsuleer ecumenical conference to pressure the Theology Council to speed up their deliberations on the theology of clones and souls (no, they are not agreed upon the specifics yet, or so 'active' NPCs have told me), Falcon asked me to hold off, saying developments on the subject were incoming. I figured Source would be that. I find myself ever doubtful of any resolution.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: PracticalTechnicality on 25 Apr 2014, 03:48
Graelyn, ignore CCp in all regards IMO.  I like Source, but WE are the content creators here. 

Pressure away, and if they don't reply, at least see if you can gather a consensus among the main Amarrian entities on how capsuleers feel on the matter. 

I don't like the idea of a good idea of yours being left to gather dust on the promises of a company that has time and again proven they have as much reliability as a Jita contract posted in local.  I still love the game CCP provides, the same way my mobile contract does what I need it to 99% of the time, but both CCP and my service provider dick me off pretty convincingly with their smug, attitude, laced with 'you don't understand' the moment anyone calls them out.

I am pretty keen on what IS in Source - not too bothered by what isn't personally, but can see it being a pain for those who have chars that need that foundation of explicit cultural context/dogma/scriptural mandate to flesh them out.  I was a little put out by the short shrift Intaki got yet again, despite the decent number of capsuleers they throw out into the cluster - but this was made up for with the Federation segment being pretty damned good (this coming from a player who isn't awfully enamoured of the Fed, but finds the libertarian dog-eat-dog society to be much more interesting than the previously imagined well-fare state riddled beatnik sit in). 

Also woo, Caldari State more socialist than any of the others.  That came as a mild surprise, but pleasantly handled. 

With this in mind, it is high time for CCP to stop painting the Minnies in shades of slave and the Amarr as 'crazy religious nuts'.  Those 'slaves' are masters of miniaturisation and mechanics, and have built a functional interstellar government from nothing (rough edges and economic problems, but it works).  Those 'crazy zealots' invented a multi-dimensional capacitor (tesseract cap unit), energy weapons before most of the others got into space and have reliable engineering that is hundreds of years old still in contemporary use.  Both of them are amazing, startlingly effective societies at odds with each other.  More self define, less 'black and white go to war' pleaaaase.

Tl;Dr: Good people in bad company make good product, while some bad apples make spurious and untenable promises which they then deny ever having made (or make sound unimportant).  More respect for the universe required by those who made it.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Graelyn on 25 Apr 2014, 04:12
Unfortunately, when the goal of an idea is to inspire NPC action (or just give CCP the chance to do something), their unwillingness to lift a finger tends to spell the end of it.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 25 Apr 2014, 04:22
Tetrimon aren't hardliner's within orthodoxy: They are heretics.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Louella Dougans on 26 Apr 2014, 14:06
Quote
The letters of Bishop Dalamaid have been the subject of volumes of intellectual discourse. The primary contention of the letters, that true saintly martyrdom is an impossibility for anyone even aware of the concept of sainthood, has gone through various levels of favor over the generations.

How does that fit with a literalist, unchanging interpretation of the Scriptures ?

Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Graelyn on 29 Apr 2014, 08:35
I would still like to pick up a copy of this (instead of relying on people telling me the contents), but due to, well, several things in my neighborhood, ordering it online is best avoided. Is this ever going to hit bookstores?
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lunarisse Aspenstar on 29 Apr 2014, 10:32
Graelyn, perhaps because the book seller thinks the lowest demand is for the Amarr section, the "preview" of Eve Source at the official CCP vendor consists of the entire Amarr section.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 29 Apr 2014, 15:51
not the entirety,it breaks of when the bllodlines are described, but it's quite agood chunk of it.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Arnulf Ogunkoya on 30 Apr 2014, 05:16
I'm just annoyed because my Kindle version will display on my tiny little (by comparison) Android phone, but refuses to work with the Kindle PC application.

Bloody DRM idiocy no doubt.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Katrina Oniseki on 30 Apr 2014, 06:36
I like Source, actually. I was pleased to find that the State actually offers free healthcare.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 30 Apr 2014, 06:44
The question is: what do you like about Source? The description of the State and the Federation seem to be differntiated and not clash with prior PF from what I hear and saw (though I'm no expert there). So, I can imagine that those parts are satisfying.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Katrina Oniseki on 01 May 2014, 07:09
No, it clashes. It's got contradictions against its own contradictions against prior PF. It's a mess, no doubt. I prefer to think (read: fantasize) it as a first edition. Full of errors, and due for a revision!

That said, for all its contradictions, I find that more satisfying. I didn't want a single "source" for all my PF. I didn't want one that was sacrosanct or inviolable. I wanted something that expands on parts of the lore that haven't been expanded on. It does that.

I went into this with the understanding that CCP wrote it, and there will be errors and contradictions. None of us really expected otherwise, did we? Maybe that's low standards, but it's realistic.

I guess I'm not concerned with it because I still read it the same way I read all other PF sources; as yet another different perspective on the same fictional worlds. If even real history books get it wrong and contradict each other, then surely this fictional one can too?

Just my laid back two cents.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lyn Farel on 01 May 2014, 09:55
If real history books get it wrong and contradict each other ?
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lunarisse Aspenstar on 01 May 2014, 10:47
If real history books get it wrong and contradict each other ?

Happens all the time Lyn.  History is shaded by the preconceptions and biases of the authors, as well as access or lack of access to all pertinent information. I've said before that Luna is viewing the Source Amarr section as being written by an ivory tower gallente academic.

American history has quite a few examples of competing interpretations/views.

Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Publius Valerius on 01 May 2014, 11:40
I thought Falcon meant it should/would be the final word? Has something changed? By the way has some wrote CCP/YARR about our critique? If yes, what was the answer? That the conflicting parts are not canon? Or under view? Or no change at all?

Would be great to have a final answer to the final answer. :P  :P :P Just joking  :P :P, I think the Source book can be in many things be the final answer or "a" answer... See Ammatar Governor question. For some things I see a problem and I will leave it by it (which i already mention, and some more about the science).

__________
Off topic. Sorry If I intercept the topic for a sec. I have wrote some stuff (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Contributions_by_Publius_Valerius#New_Stuff), but I will make a break and/or leave; and no you cant have my stuff  :D (maybe in few years Im back  :lol:). As for the wiki, you can add everything you like or see (I havent log any of my pages), as well as you people can finish those pages: Khanid Cyber Knights (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Khanid_Cyber_Knights), GotKK (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Government_of_the_Khanid_Kingdom), The Dragoon (http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/The_Dragoon_(lore)).
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lyn Farel on 01 May 2014, 12:50
If real history books get it wrong and contradict each other ?

Happens all the time Lyn.  History is shaded by the preconceptions and biases of the authors, as well as access or lack of access to all pertinent information. I've said before that Luna is viewing the Source Amarr section as being written by an ivory tower gallente academic.

American history has quite a few examples of competing interpretations/views.

It was more of a question for clarification actually.

Most of History is written and done in the eye of its contemporaries, sometimes conflicting, and subject to various interpretations even nowadays. However, most of historical facts are quite factual these days. We have enough material to safely assume a good chunk of the truth, and everything that is objectively stated happened, except for the only part of History that is still shrouded in mystery even today, which is precolumbian history due to a sheer lack of sources.

What can change is historians's own interpretation subjective judgement based on historical established facts.  And that's precisely what is written here in Source. In most comprehensive historical reports you will often find several points of views and counter views revolving around several interpretation of a single historical fact, and all will be stated, even in summarized amateur reports like wikipedia where you can find most of the time a clear exposition of criticisms. In Source, this does not seem to be the case, unlike it was in the eve wiki at times.

Thus why it is a shame to see that source canon > eve wiki, which should be the contrary actually. I will often put more credit on a comprehensive article than on a showcase book with pretty pictures to sell the universe to aficionados.

Your IC view on the matter is the correct course of action of course, but from experience, it will most of the time be met by OOC refusal to acknowledge it for that is does not follow the true, unilateral Canon.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Katrina Oniseki on 01 May 2014, 15:56
If real history books get it wrong and contradict each other ?

Yes, that is exactly to what I was referring to. They get it wrong and contradict too, so why can't a fictional history book?

All that being said, I don't think it's a problem. I'm sure somebody out there can make a mountain out of a molehill because I ignore certain PF or interpret it for my own ends. Oh well. It's just a game.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Vieve on 02 May 2014, 13:33
The question is: what do you like about Source? The description of the State and the Federation seem to be differntiated and not clash with prior PF from what I hear and saw (though I'm no expert there). So, I can imagine that those parts are satisfying.

I read the Federation section twice, then stared it for a little while.   Mess though it is in places, I can fit everything I've done into it without too much trouble.

I'm not sure that's a good thing.  :P
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Elmund Egivand on 03 May 2014, 01:39
The question is: what do you like about Source? The description of the State and the Federation seem to be differntiated and not clash with prior PF from what I hear and saw (though I'm no expert there). So, I can imagine that those parts are satisfying.

Gallente and Caldari are the best parts of Source simply because they present both shades of their societies.

Amarr and Minmatar segments are, however, very weak. Amarr's a bit too one-sided, all about the power struggles, politicking and intrigue (and slavery. So much slavery) and nothing about their charitable sides and how the Amarr are just as likely to move into a system en-masse to drop much needed aid packages as they are to invade and enslave the populace.

Minmatar is even worse. There's too little about life in the Republic and too much about Slavery. Slaves, oh so many slaves. It's like the only defining feature of the Minmatar are their identity crisis and Slavery. Hardly anything about their culture. At least the Amarr has got sections dedicated to Amarrian culture.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Gwen Ikiryo on 06 May 2014, 22:34
Since I'm sort of half-considering playing the game again for a while, I should ask, does the book say anything about Achura?
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Elmund Egivand on 07 May 2014, 02:00
Since I'm sort of half-considering playing the game again for a while, I should ask, does the book say anything about Achura?

Lumped together with everyone else under the Caldari section. They do not really go much into the details of the bloodlines unfortunately.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Gwen Ikiryo on 08 May 2014, 21:03
Lumped together with everyone else under the Caldari section. They do not really go much into the details of the bloodlines unfortunately.

Lame!
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: orange on 10 May 2014, 10:35
Gallente and Caldari are the best parts of Source simply because they present both shades of their societies.

Amarr and Minmatar segments are, however, very weak. Amarr's a bit too one-sided, all about the power struggles, politicking and intrigue (and slavery. So much slavery) and nothing about their charitable sides and how the Amarr are just as likely to move into a system en-masse to drop much needed aid packages as they are to invade and enslave the populace.

Minmatar is even worse. There's too little about life in the Republic and too much about Slavery. Slaves, oh so many slaves. It's like the only defining feature of the Minmatar are their identity crisis and Slavery. Hardly anything about their culture. At least the Amarr has got sections dedicated to Amarrian culture.

So, modern Nordic authors had trouble creating detailed shades for civilizations/cultures largely distinct from their own.  Not surprised at all.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Louella Dougans on 10 May 2014, 11:17
I'd find the thing that shows that Amarr racial intolerance isn't an integral part of the culture, and that intermarriage between bloodlines is common enough, but... it's ingame stuff.

And CCP says that Source > anything you can encounter ingame.

so why even bother.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lyn Farel on 10 May 2014, 12:24
By definition Amarr can't be racially intolerant if they follow the Reclaiming principles. Supremacists, yeah, though.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Horatius Caul on 10 May 2014, 13:08
Quote
The letters of Bishop Dalamaid have been the subject of volumes of intellectual discourse. The primary contention of the letters, that true saintly martyrdom is an impossibility for anyone even aware of the concept of sainthood, has gone through various levels of favor over the generations.

How does that fit with a literalist, unchanging interpretation of the Scriptures ?
I don't think that's a view that exists. The Scriptures have always been in flux, and they are constantly being reinterpreted. They are so voluminous that no-one can ever have encyclopedic knowledge of them, and thus no-one can obey them in their entirety. Every new Emperor, every new High Deacon, and every new scientific discovery will change the orthodox intepretation.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Louella Dougans on 10 May 2014, 13:39
By definition Amarr can't be racially intolerant if they follow the Reclaiming principles. Supremacists, yeah, though.

when eve source says blah blah tainted souls of non-amarr, and that this is an important part of the religion, then explain why a True Amarr woman would marry and have children with an AMMATAR admiral. Not a Udorian, or Khanid, who were at least from Athra, but an actual Ammatar, descended from a planet of slaves.

but of course, that Ammatar admiral is an ingame npc, and thus, is non-canon.

:giant psyccp emoticon made of smaller psyccp emoticons:
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lyn Farel on 10 May 2014, 13:58
Well I wasn't really arguing against your point... I just feel that the way they presented it in eve source, the Amarr do not seem to reconcile very well with the concept of Reclaiming on several things.

Unless they are actually trying to imply that the whole Amarr doctrine is actually an incoherent hypocrisy in itself. Which is possible.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 16 May 2014, 03:55
If real history books get it wrong and contradict each other ?

Yes, that is exactly to what I was referring to. They get it wrong and contradict too, so why can't a fictional history book?

All that being said, I don't think it's a problem. I'm sure somebody out there can make a mountain out of a molehill because I ignore certain PF or interpret it for my own ends. Oh well. It's just a game.

Well, then the problem I have is rather those people that cry "U r doin it rong!" than the book. Then again, those people that take EVE: Source to be the non plus ultra in deciding canonicity are backed up fiercly by CCP there. So again, not so much a problem with the book in itself (aside the usual failings of EVE lore) but with how CCP advertises it as the ultimate answer to everything (despite internal inconsitencies).

As to the Gallente/Caldari portrayal in EVE: Source. I really just skimmed over it (and as I said am no expert for the background there anyway), so I didn't notice any contradictions there, but I have no problem to adjust my prior misconceptions there.

As to the Amarr having at least something in regard to their culture being better off than the Matari: I'd rather have preffered to not get what they wrote on Amarr culture there.
Quote
The letters of Bishop Dalamaid have been the subject of volumes of intellectual discourse. The primary contention of the letters, that true saintly martyrdom is an impossibility for anyone even aware of the concept of sainthood, has gone through various levels of favor over the generations.

How does that fit with a literalist, unchanging interpretation of the Scriptures ?
I don't think that's a view that exists. The Scriptures have always been in flux, and they are constantly being reinterpreted. They are so voluminous that no-one can ever have encyclopedic knowledge of them, and thus no-one can obey them in their entirety. Every new Emperor, every new High Deacon, and every new scientific discovery will change the orthodox intepretation.

"Indeed, it appears the general feeling is that any attempt to do so [to rephrase scriptural truth in different words] would be not only useless but also rather unseemly - perhaps even sacrilegous." - EVE Source

So, according to this, the TC/Emperor might add or take away from the Scripture, there is no interpretation possible if you can't rephrase the truth in Scripture by other words than those Scripture uses. So, according to EVE Source Amarr would have to go by a) a literal interpretation or b) by the idea that any interpretation that is non-literal can't be expressed. Of course that conflicts with prior PF on the nature of the Amarr Scriptures, but EVE: Source is supposed to overrule previous PF...
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Lyn Farel on 16 May 2014, 04:04
Ah, there is that too.

And even funnier, pushing it a bit more far and you basically can't explain scriptures to someone ICly since it would imply using your own words and sentences to describe them. Even literally.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 16 May 2014, 05:49
Of course. All that there is to be said about Scripture is what it does say itself, according to EVE: Source. :< *derp*
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 16 May 2014, 06:02
I don't really like replying to threads that I've formally backed out of, but this one apparently isn't dying.

Though I largely support Source, on that part I agree that it's a bit iffy but I'm not sure if we want to read into it too literally. Definitive source or not, people make mistakes and there's a few areas where that's clearly done in the book. Especially glaring is the mistaken date of Midular's assassination, where the book claims it was in 113 instead of 115--I don't think anyone here would argue that that was an intentional retcon of the date. It's probable that the writers didn't really think about the implications of that line.

Has anyone asked one of the writers for clarification on if that was the intent? Source is intended to be the baseline moving forward, but it's very, very easy to write something thinking it means one thing only to have it imply something else entirely. I've considered sending a PM about it myself, but I'm not sure I'd be able to phrase the issue as well as other people have.

Of course, if it was intended to be read that way then I have to agree that it was a bad change to make.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 16 May 2014, 06:11
Though I largely support Source, on that part I agree that it's a bit iffy but I'm not sure if we want to read into it too literally.
That one is great! :D

I have pointed out the complications of this line (and others) to a CCP employee asking for opinions on Source while Falcon sat next to him: It got ignored. :(
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 16 May 2014, 06:15
:(

I'll try sending a PM then. Maybe I'll get better luck.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 16 May 2014, 06:17
As I don't have contact to the CCP employees responsible, I'd appreciate that. One can always try. Crossing fingers for you, here.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 16 May 2014, 06:30
Well I don't have any special contact or anything, just PMs on the official forums. Falcon at least definitely had involvement with Source and answered my previous PMs, so I'll send one to him.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: kalaratiri on 16 May 2014, 10:12
I got mine today, in hardback. Having not read it yet, I can only give my opinions of the physical object and god damn CCP know how to make a sexy book.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 16 May 2014, 12:52
The physical book isn't at all what CCP made. ^^ If anythin, CCP knows how to choose someone who can make a sexy book. <,<
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 22 May 2014, 17:54
:(

I'll try sending a PM then. Maybe I'll get better luck.

Any luck, yet?
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Samira Kernher on 22 May 2014, 18:04
Haven't gotten around to writing it yet. Been a bit busy this week.
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Nicoletta Mithra on 23 May 2014, 04:06
Okay. :)
Title: Re: Feedback: EVE: Source
Post by: Ayallah on 04 Jun 2014, 17:43
Nothing about Kameiras :(

I still love my book though.  It was nice to have Aya's political assertions and ideals confirmed in source.   

The capsule stuff came as a bit of a shock though.